A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage

Abstract Background In light of the biodiversity crisis and our limited ability to explain variation in biodiversity, tools to quantify spatial and temporal variation in biodiversity and its underlying drivers are critically needed. Inspired by the recently published ecospace framework, we developed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg, Hans Henrik Bruun, Lars Brøndum, Aimée T. Classen, Lars Dalby, Kåre Fog, Tobias G. Frøslev, Irina Goldberg, Anders Johannes Hansen, Morten D. D. Hansen, Toke T. Høye, Anders A. Illum, Thomas Læssøe, Gregory S. Newman, Lars Skipper, Ulrik Søchting, Rasmus Ejrnæs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-10-01
Series:BMC Ecology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12898-019-0260-x
_version_ 1818732907501453312
author Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg
Hans Henrik Bruun
Lars Brøndum
Aimée T. Classen
Lars Dalby
Kåre Fog
Tobias G. Frøslev
Irina Goldberg
Anders Johannes Hansen
Morten D. D. Hansen
Toke T. Høye
Anders A. Illum
Thomas Læssøe
Gregory S. Newman
Lars Skipper
Ulrik Søchting
Rasmus Ejrnæs
author_facet Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg
Hans Henrik Bruun
Lars Brøndum
Aimée T. Classen
Lars Dalby
Kåre Fog
Tobias G. Frøslev
Irina Goldberg
Anders Johannes Hansen
Morten D. D. Hansen
Toke T. Høye
Anders A. Illum
Thomas Læssøe
Gregory S. Newman
Lars Skipper
Ulrik Søchting
Rasmus Ejrnæs
author_sort Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background In light of the biodiversity crisis and our limited ability to explain variation in biodiversity, tools to quantify spatial and temporal variation in biodiversity and its underlying drivers are critically needed. Inspired by the recently published ecospace framework, we developed and tested a sampling design for environmental and biotic mapping. We selected 130 study sites (40 × 40 m) across Denmark using stratified random sampling along the major environmental gradients underlying biotic variation. Using standardized methods, we collected site species data on vascular plants, bryophytes, macrofungi, lichens, gastropods and arthropods. To evaluate sampling efficiency, we calculated regional coverage (relative to the known species number per taxonomic group), and site scale coverage (i.e., sample completeness per taxonomic group at each site). To extend taxonomic coverage to organisms that are difficult to sample by classical inventories (e.g., nematodes and non-fruiting fungi), we collected soil for metabarcoding. Finally, to assess site conditions, we mapped abiotic conditions, biotic resources and habitat continuity. Results Despite the 130 study sites only covering a minute fraction (0.0005%) of the total Danish terrestrial area, we found 1774 species of macrofungi (54% of the Danish fungal species pool), 663 vascular plant species (42%), 254 bryophyte species (41%) and 200 lichen species (19%). For arthropods, we observed 330 spider species (58%), 123 carabid beetle species (37%) and 99 hoverfly species (33%). Overall, sample coverage was remarkably high across taxonomic groups and sufficient to capture substantial spatial variation in biodiversity across Denmark. This inventory is nationally unprecedented in detail and resulted in the discovery of 143 species with no previous record for Denmark. Comparison between plant OTUs detected in soil DNA and observed plant species confirmed the usefulness of carefully curated environmental DNA-data. Correlations among species richness for taxonomic groups were predominantly positive, but did not correlate well among all taxa suggesting differential and complex biotic responses to environmental variation. Conclusions We successfully and adequately sampled a wide range of diverse taxa along key environmental gradients across Denmark using an approach that includes multi-taxon biodiversity assessment and ecospace mapping. Our approach is applicable to assessments of biodiversity in other regions and biomes where species are structured along environmental gradient.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T23:41:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eae367e2d1b3421f83b2d82702250ab6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6785
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T23:41:02Z
publishDate 2019-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ecology
spelling doaj.art-eae367e2d1b3421f83b2d82702250ab62022-12-21T21:28:27ZengBMCBMC Ecology1472-67852019-10-0119111510.1186/s12898-019-0260-xA systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverageAne Kirstine Brunbjerg0Hans Henrik Bruun1Lars Brøndum2Aimée T. Classen3Lars Dalby4Kåre FogTobias G. Frøslev5Irina Goldberg6Anders Johannes Hansen7Morten D. D. Hansen8Toke T. Høye9Anders A. Illum10Thomas Læssøe11Gregory S. Newman12Lars Skipper13Ulrik Søchting14Rasmus Ejrnæs15Section for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus UniversitySection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenNatural History Museum AarhusRubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of VermontSection for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus UniversityCentre for GeoGenetics, GLOBE Institute, University of CopenhagenSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenCentre for GeoGenetics, GLOBE Institute, University of CopenhagenNatural History Museum AarhusSection for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus UniversityCentre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of CopenhagenSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenCentre for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of CopenhagenNatural History Museum AarhusSection for Ecology and Evolution, Department of Biology, University of CopenhagenSection for Biodiversity & Conservation, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus UniversityAbstract Background In light of the biodiversity crisis and our limited ability to explain variation in biodiversity, tools to quantify spatial and temporal variation in biodiversity and its underlying drivers are critically needed. Inspired by the recently published ecospace framework, we developed and tested a sampling design for environmental and biotic mapping. We selected 130 study sites (40 × 40 m) across Denmark using stratified random sampling along the major environmental gradients underlying biotic variation. Using standardized methods, we collected site species data on vascular plants, bryophytes, macrofungi, lichens, gastropods and arthropods. To evaluate sampling efficiency, we calculated regional coverage (relative to the known species number per taxonomic group), and site scale coverage (i.e., sample completeness per taxonomic group at each site). To extend taxonomic coverage to organisms that are difficult to sample by classical inventories (e.g., nematodes and non-fruiting fungi), we collected soil for metabarcoding. Finally, to assess site conditions, we mapped abiotic conditions, biotic resources and habitat continuity. Results Despite the 130 study sites only covering a minute fraction (0.0005%) of the total Danish terrestrial area, we found 1774 species of macrofungi (54% of the Danish fungal species pool), 663 vascular plant species (42%), 254 bryophyte species (41%) and 200 lichen species (19%). For arthropods, we observed 330 spider species (58%), 123 carabid beetle species (37%) and 99 hoverfly species (33%). Overall, sample coverage was remarkably high across taxonomic groups and sufficient to capture substantial spatial variation in biodiversity across Denmark. This inventory is nationally unprecedented in detail and resulted in the discovery of 143 species with no previous record for Denmark. Comparison between plant OTUs detected in soil DNA and observed plant species confirmed the usefulness of carefully curated environmental DNA-data. Correlations among species richness for taxonomic groups were predominantly positive, but did not correlate well among all taxa suggesting differential and complex biotic responses to environmental variation. Conclusions We successfully and adequately sampled a wide range of diverse taxa along key environmental gradients across Denmark using an approach that includes multi-taxon biodiversity assessment and ecospace mapping. Our approach is applicable to assessments of biodiversity in other regions and biomes where species are structured along environmental gradient.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12898-019-0260-xAbiotic gradientsBiotic factorsContinuityDenmarkDisturbanceeDNA
spellingShingle Ane Kirstine Brunbjerg
Hans Henrik Bruun
Lars Brøndum
Aimée T. Classen
Lars Dalby
Kåre Fog
Tobias G. Frøslev
Irina Goldberg
Anders Johannes Hansen
Morten D. D. Hansen
Toke T. Høye
Anders A. Illum
Thomas Læssøe
Gregory S. Newman
Lars Skipper
Ulrik Søchting
Rasmus Ejrnæs
A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
BMC Ecology
Abiotic gradients
Biotic factors
Continuity
Denmark
Disturbance
eDNA
title A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
title_full A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
title_fullStr A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
title_full_unstemmed A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
title_short A systematic survey of regional multi-taxon biodiversity: evaluating strategies and coverage
title_sort systematic survey of regional multi taxon biodiversity evaluating strategies and coverage
topic Abiotic gradients
Biotic factors
Continuity
Denmark
Disturbance
eDNA
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12898-019-0260-x
work_keys_str_mv AT anekirstinebrunbjerg asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT hanshenrikbruun asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsbrøndum asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT aimeetclassen asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsdalby asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT karefog asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT tobiasgfrøslev asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT irinagoldberg asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT andersjohanneshansen asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT mortenddhansen asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT tokethøye asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT andersaillum asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT thomaslæssøe asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT gregorysnewman asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsskipper asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT ulriksøchting asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT rasmusejrnæs asystematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT anekirstinebrunbjerg systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT hanshenrikbruun systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsbrøndum systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT aimeetclassen systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsdalby systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT karefog systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT tobiasgfrøslev systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT irinagoldberg systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT andersjohanneshansen systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT mortenddhansen systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT tokethøye systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT andersaillum systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT thomaslæssøe systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT gregorysnewman systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT larsskipper systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT ulriksøchting systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage
AT rasmusejrnæs systematicsurveyofregionalmultitaxonbiodiversityevaluatingstrategiesandcoverage