The Norwegian public’s ability to assess treatment claims: results of a cross-sectional study of critical health literacy [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: Few studies have evaluated the ability of the general public to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of healthcare. For the most part, those studies have used self-reported measures of critical health literacy. Methods: We mailed 4500 invitations to Norwegian adults. Re...
Main Authors: | Kjetil Furuseth-Olsen, Astrid Dahlgren, Andrew David Oxman, Christopher James Rose |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021-07-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/9-179/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where’s the evidence? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Astrid Dahlgren, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where’s the evidence? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Astrid Dahlgren, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Debating claims of fact in public health: A pedagogical activity
by: Julie Homchick Crowe
Published: (2024-04-01) -
Contextualizing critical thinking about health using digital technology in secondary schools in Kenya: a qualitative analysis
by: Faith Chesire, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Co-Design of a website for women with pelvic organ prolapse: A study protocol [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Catherine Doody, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01)