The Norwegian public’s ability to assess treatment claims: results of a cross-sectional study of critical health literacy [version 2; peer review: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
Background: Few studies have evaluated the ability of the general public to assess the trustworthiness of claims about the effects of healthcare. For the most part, those studies have used self-reported measures of critical health literacy. Methods: We mailed 4500 invitations to Norwegian adults. Re...
Main Authors: | Kjetil Furuseth-Olsen, Astrid Dahlgren, Andrew David Oxman, Christopher James Rose |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
F1000 Research Ltd
2021-07-01
|
Series: | F1000Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://f1000research.com/articles/9-179/v2 |
Similar Items
-
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where’s the evidence? [version 2; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Astrid Dahlgren, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01) -
Key concepts for informed health choices: Where’s the evidence? [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
by: Astrid Dahlgren, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Feasibility of contextualizing the Informed Health Choices learning resources in Italy: A pilot study in a primary school in Florence [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]
by: Maria Grazia Celani, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01) -
Effects of the Informed Health Choices primary school intervention on the ability of children in Uganda to assess the reliability of claims about treatment effects, 1-year follow-up: a cluster-randomised trial
by: Allen Nsangi, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01) -
Evaluating student’s ability to assess treatment claims: validating a German version of the Claim Evaluation Tools
by: Jana Hinneburg, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)