Mind-Dependent Kinds

Many philosophers take mind-independence to be criterial for realism about kinds. This is problematic when it comes to psychological and social kinds, which are unavoidably mind-dependent. But reflection on the case of artificial or synthetic kinds (e.g. synthetic chemicals, genetically modified or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Ali Khalidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2016-08-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6834
_version_ 1797818243978625024
author Muhammad Ali Khalidi
author_facet Muhammad Ali Khalidi
author_sort Muhammad Ali Khalidi
collection DOAJ
description Many philosophers take mind-independence to be criterial for realism about kinds. This is problematic when it comes to psychological and social kinds, which are unavoidably mind-dependent. But reflection on the case of artificial or synthetic kinds (e.g. synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms) shows that the criterion of mind-independence needs to be qualified in certain ways. However, I argue that none of the usual variants on the criterion of mind-dependence is capable of distinguishing real or natural kinds from non-real kinds. Although there is a way of modifying the criterion of mind-independence in such a way as to rule in artificial kinds but rule out psychological and social kinds, this does not make the latter non-real. I conclude by proposing a different way of distinguishing real from non-real kinds, which does not involve mind-independence and does not necessarily exclude psychological and social kinds.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:06:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eae7e822b74043b7adf639c006d6bc25
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:06:21Z
publishDate 2016-08-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-eae7e822b74043b7adf639c006d6bc252023-05-28T07:32:23ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96632016-08-0122Mind-Dependent KindsMuhammad Ali Khalidi0York University Many philosophers take mind-independence to be criterial for realism about kinds. This is problematic when it comes to psychological and social kinds, which are unavoidably mind-dependent. But reflection on the case of artificial or synthetic kinds (e.g. synthetic chemicals, genetically modified organisms) shows that the criterion of mind-independence needs to be qualified in certain ways. However, I argue that none of the usual variants on the criterion of mind-dependence is capable of distinguishing real or natural kinds from non-real kinds. Although there is a way of modifying the criterion of mind-independence in such a way as to rule in artificial kinds but rule out psychological and social kinds, this does not make the latter non-real. I conclude by proposing a different way of distinguishing real from non-real kinds, which does not involve mind-independence and does not necessarily exclude psychological and social kinds. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6834natural kindssocial kindspsychological kindshuman kindssocial ontology
spellingShingle Muhammad Ali Khalidi
Mind-Dependent Kinds
Journal of Social Ontology
natural kinds
social kinds
psychological kinds
human kinds
social ontology
title Mind-Dependent Kinds
title_full Mind-Dependent Kinds
title_fullStr Mind-Dependent Kinds
title_full_unstemmed Mind-Dependent Kinds
title_short Mind-Dependent Kinds
title_sort mind dependent kinds
topic natural kinds
social kinds
psychological kinds
human kinds
social ontology
url https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6834
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadalikhalidi minddependentkinds