PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE
Ensuring competitiveness in the procedures for the use of expertise in criminal proceedings is one of the most discussed problems in modern criminal procedure literature. Many difficulties here seem insurmountable, and the means to address them are ineffective. Purpose: to determine the most complet...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bashkir State University
2023-03-01
|
| Series: | Правовое государство: теория и практика |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/737 |
| _version_ | 1797843609964249088 |
|---|---|
| author | TARASOV Aleksandr Alekseyevich |
| author_facet | TARASOV Aleksandr Alekseyevich |
| author_sort | TARASOV Aleksandr Alekseyevich |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Ensuring competitiveness in the procedures for the use of expertise in criminal proceedings is one of the most discussed problems in modern criminal procedure literature. Many difficulties here seem insurmountable, and the means to address them are ineffective. Purpose: to determine the most complete list of petitions of participants in criminal procedure who do not have authority, first of all defense lawyers, to group petitions according to the purpose of the application, to identify the reasons for the lack of effectiveness and ways to improve it. Methods: structural-system analysis and synthesis, specific legal, concrete-sociological method, method of included observation. Results: the main conclusion of the research is that the arsenal of means available to defense lawyers and representatives involved in criminal proceedings to ensure the adversarial nature of procedures for using expertise in proving in criminal cases is implemented in practice, as a rule, not completely and without taking into account systemic connections both within this arsenal and in the general system of criminal procedure regulation. Practical recommendations are made to improve the efficiency of advocacy related to the appointment and production of forensic examinations. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:08:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-eae87034431246e2a6aa5a29a3ac2aee |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2500-0217 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-09T17:08:05Z |
| publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
| publisher | Bashkir State University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Правовое государство: теория и практика |
| spelling | doaj.art-eae87034431246e2a6aa5a29a3ac2aee2023-04-20T09:52:50ZengBashkir State UniversityПравовое государство: теория и практика2500-02172023-03-01191(71)455010.33184/pravgos-2023.1.7PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCETARASOV Aleksandr Alekseyevich0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6743-5517Ufa University of Science and TechnologiesEnsuring competitiveness in the procedures for the use of expertise in criminal proceedings is one of the most discussed problems in modern criminal procedure literature. Many difficulties here seem insurmountable, and the means to address them are ineffective. Purpose: to determine the most complete list of petitions of participants in criminal procedure who do not have authority, first of all defense lawyers, to group petitions according to the purpose of the application, to identify the reasons for the lack of effectiveness and ways to improve it. Methods: structural-system analysis and synthesis, specific legal, concrete-sociological method, method of included observation. Results: the main conclusion of the research is that the arsenal of means available to defense lawyers and representatives involved in criminal proceedings to ensure the adversarial nature of procedures for using expertise in proving in criminal cases is implemented in practice, as a rule, not completely and without taking into account systemic connections both within this arsenal and in the general system of criminal procedure regulation. Practical recommendations are made to improve the efficiency of advocacy related to the appointment and production of forensic examinations.https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/737criminal procedurecriminal proceedingsforensic expert activity in criminal casesexpertspecialistappointment of forensic examinationexpert’s conclusion and testimonyspecialist’s conclusion and testimony |
| spellingShingle | TARASOV Aleksandr Alekseyevich PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE Правовое государство: теория и практика criminal procedure criminal proceedings forensic expert activity in criminal cases expert specialist appointment of forensic examination expert’s conclusion and testimony specialist’s conclusion and testimony |
| title | PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE |
| title_full | PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE |
| title_fullStr | PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE |
| title_full_unstemmed | PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE |
| title_short | PETITIONS IN PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF EXPERTISE IN CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL EVIDENCE |
| title_sort | petitions in procedures for the use of expertise in criminal procedural evidence |
| topic | criminal procedure criminal proceedings forensic expert activity in criminal cases expert specialist appointment of forensic examination expert’s conclusion and testimony specialist’s conclusion and testimony |
| url | https://pravgos.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/737 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tarasovaleksandralekseyevich petitionsinproceduresfortheuseofexpertiseincriminalproceduralevidence |