Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014

Abstract Purpose Commonly-used violence surveillance systems are biased towards certain populations due to overreporting or over-scrutinized. Hospital discharge data may offer a more representative view of violence, through use of proxy codes, i.e. diagnosis of injuries correlated with violence. The...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Jeanie Santaularia, Marizen R. Ramirez, Theresa L. Osypuk, Susan M. Mason
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-11-01
Series:Injury Epidemiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00354-6
_version_ 1819010992128917504
author N. Jeanie Santaularia
Marizen R. Ramirez
Theresa L. Osypuk
Susan M. Mason
author_facet N. Jeanie Santaularia
Marizen R. Ramirez
Theresa L. Osypuk
Susan M. Mason
author_sort N. Jeanie Santaularia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose Commonly-used violence surveillance systems are biased towards certain populations due to overreporting or over-scrutinized. Hospital discharge data may offer a more representative view of violence, through use of proxy codes, i.e. diagnosis of injuries correlated with violence. The goals of this paper are to compare the trends in violence in Minnesota, and associations of county-level demographic characteristics with violence rates, measured through explicitly diagnosed violence and proxy codes. It is an exploration of how certain sub-populations are overrepresented in traditional surveillance systems. Methods Using Minnesota hospital discharge data linked with census data from 2004 to 2014, this study examined the distribution and time trends of explicit, proxy, and combined (proxy and explicit) codes for child abuse, intimate partner violence (IPV), and elder abuse. The associations between county-level risk factors (e.g., poverty) and county violence rates were estimated using negative binomial regression models with generalized estimation equations to account for clustering over time. Results The main finding was that the patterns of county-level violence differed depending on whether one used explicit or proxy codes. In particular, explicit codes suggested that child abuse and IPV trends were flat or decreased slightly from 2004 to 2014, while proxy codes suggested the opposite. Elder abuse increased during this timeframe for both explicit and proxy codes, but more dramatically when using proxy codes. In regard to the associations between county level characteristics and each violence subtype, previously identified county-level risk factors were more strongly related to explicitly-identified violence than to proxy-identified violence. Given the larger number of proxy-identified cases as compared with explicit-identified violence cases, the trends and associations of combined codes align more closely with proxy codes, especially for elder abuse and IPV. Conclusions Violence surveillance utilizing hospital discharge data, and particularly proxy codes, may add important information that traditional surveillance misses. Most importantly, explicit and proxy codes indicate different associations with county sociodemographic characteristics. Future research should examine hospital discharge data for violence identification to validate proxy codes that can be utilized to help to identify the hidden burden of violence.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T01:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eaeebfabc92c41a98e22caa73254c60c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1714
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T01:21:04Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Injury Epidemiology
spelling doaj.art-eaeebfabc92c41a98e22caa73254c60c2022-12-21T19:20:38ZengBMCInjury Epidemiology2197-17142021-11-018111210.1186/s40621-021-00354-6Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014N. Jeanie Santaularia0Marizen R. Ramirez1Theresa L. Osypuk2Susan M. Mason3Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public HealthDivision of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public HealthDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public HealthDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public HealthAbstract Purpose Commonly-used violence surveillance systems are biased towards certain populations due to overreporting or over-scrutinized. Hospital discharge data may offer a more representative view of violence, through use of proxy codes, i.e. diagnosis of injuries correlated with violence. The goals of this paper are to compare the trends in violence in Minnesota, and associations of county-level demographic characteristics with violence rates, measured through explicitly diagnosed violence and proxy codes. It is an exploration of how certain sub-populations are overrepresented in traditional surveillance systems. Methods Using Minnesota hospital discharge data linked with census data from 2004 to 2014, this study examined the distribution and time trends of explicit, proxy, and combined (proxy and explicit) codes for child abuse, intimate partner violence (IPV), and elder abuse. The associations between county-level risk factors (e.g., poverty) and county violence rates were estimated using negative binomial regression models with generalized estimation equations to account for clustering over time. Results The main finding was that the patterns of county-level violence differed depending on whether one used explicit or proxy codes. In particular, explicit codes suggested that child abuse and IPV trends were flat or decreased slightly from 2004 to 2014, while proxy codes suggested the opposite. Elder abuse increased during this timeframe for both explicit and proxy codes, but more dramatically when using proxy codes. In regard to the associations between county level characteristics and each violence subtype, previously identified county-level risk factors were more strongly related to explicitly-identified violence than to proxy-identified violence. Given the larger number of proxy-identified cases as compared with explicit-identified violence cases, the trends and associations of combined codes align more closely with proxy codes, especially for elder abuse and IPV. Conclusions Violence surveillance utilizing hospital discharge data, and particularly proxy codes, may add important information that traditional surveillance misses. Most importantly, explicit and proxy codes indicate different associations with county sociodemographic characteristics. Future research should examine hospital discharge data for violence identification to validate proxy codes that can be utilized to help to identify the hidden burden of violence.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00354-6Violent injurySurveillanceHospital dataChild abuseIntimate partner violenceElder abuse
spellingShingle N. Jeanie Santaularia
Marizen R. Ramirez
Theresa L. Osypuk
Susan M. Mason
Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
Injury Epidemiology
Violent injury
Surveillance
Hospital data
Child abuse
Intimate partner violence
Elder abuse
title Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
title_full Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
title_fullStr Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
title_full_unstemmed Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
title_short Measuring the hidden burden of violence: use of explicit and proxy codes in Minnesota injury hospitalizations, 2004–2014
title_sort measuring the hidden burden of violence use of explicit and proxy codes in minnesota injury hospitalizations 2004 2014
topic Violent injury
Surveillance
Hospital data
Child abuse
Intimate partner violence
Elder abuse
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00354-6
work_keys_str_mv AT njeaniesantaularia measuringthehiddenburdenofviolenceuseofexplicitandproxycodesinminnesotainjuryhospitalizations20042014
AT marizenrramirez measuringthehiddenburdenofviolenceuseofexplicitandproxycodesinminnesotainjuryhospitalizations20042014
AT theresalosypuk measuringthehiddenburdenofviolenceuseofexplicitandproxycodesinminnesotainjuryhospitalizations20042014
AT susanmmason measuringthehiddenburdenofviolenceuseofexplicitandproxycodesinminnesotainjuryhospitalizations20042014