Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures

Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-operative lidocaine hematoma block (HB) to ropivacaine HB and to compare the efficacy of different timings of ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing the osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. Study Design: We conducte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Irene Dimopoulou, Tilemachos Anagnostou, Ioannis Savvas, Panagiota Karamichali, Nikitas Prassinos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-09-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2858
_version_ 1797581616719069184
author Irene Dimopoulou
Tilemachos Anagnostou
Ioannis Savvas
Panagiota Karamichali
Nikitas Prassinos
author_facet Irene Dimopoulou
Tilemachos Anagnostou
Ioannis Savvas
Panagiota Karamichali
Nikitas Prassinos
author_sort Irene Dimopoulou
collection DOAJ
description Objective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-operative lidocaine hematoma block (HB) to ropivacaine HB and to compare the efficacy of different timings of ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing the osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. Study Design: We conducted a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical study. Animals: Forty-eight dogs with long-bone fractures were included and were randomly allocated to four groups: lidocaine (L), ropivacaine (Rmid), ropivacaine pre- (Rpre) and ropivacaine post- (Rpost) groups. Methods: The dogs in group L (n = 14) and in group Rmid (n = 11) received a lidocaine or ropivacaine HB, respectively, after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement. Rpre dogs (n = 11) received ropivacaine HB before fracture reduction, and Rpost dogs (n = 12) received ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement. Eight post-operative pain assessments were performed using the University of Melbourne Pain Scale (UMPS) and an algometer. Rescue analgesia was administered based on UMPS scoring. For data analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test of normality, chi-square, Student t test and Split Plot analysis were used. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: Rescue analgesia was administered to one dog in group L, one in group Rmid and one in group Rpost, with no significant differences detected. Compared to group Rmid, group L dogs exhibited significantly higher mean mechanical pain thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.049) and lower mean UMPS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Group Rpost dogs had statistically significantly higher mean pain thresholds compared to group Rmid (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Clinical Implications: When performed after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement, lidocaine HB seems to be more effective than ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. The administration of ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement seems to be more effective than administration after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement or administration before fracture reduction in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T23:08:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb0b7b0ed977475fa8c7759f7eac62a6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T23:08:01Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-eb0b7b0ed977475fa8c7759f7eac62a62023-11-19T09:14:35ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-09-011318285810.3390/ani13182858Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone FracturesIrene Dimopoulou0Tilemachos Anagnostou1Ioannis Savvas2Panagiota Karamichali3Nikitas Prassinos4Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Emergency and Critical Care Unit, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54627 Thessaloniki, GreeceAnaesthesia, Analgesia, Emergency and Critical Care Unit, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54627 Thessaloniki, GreeceAnaesthesia, Analgesia, Emergency and Critical Care Unit, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54627 Thessaloniki, GreeceAnaesthesia, Analgesia, Emergency and Critical Care Unit, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54627 Thessaloniki, GreeceSurgery & Obstetrics Unit, Companion Animal Clinic, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University, 54627 Thessaloniki, GreeceObjective: We aimed to compare the efficacy of intra-operative lidocaine hematoma block (HB) to ropivacaine HB and to compare the efficacy of different timings of ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing the osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. Study Design: We conducted a randomized, blinded, prospective clinical study. Animals: Forty-eight dogs with long-bone fractures were included and were randomly allocated to four groups: lidocaine (L), ropivacaine (Rmid), ropivacaine pre- (Rpre) and ropivacaine post- (Rpost) groups. Methods: The dogs in group L (n = 14) and in group Rmid (n = 11) received a lidocaine or ropivacaine HB, respectively, after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement. Rpre dogs (n = 11) received ropivacaine HB before fracture reduction, and Rpost dogs (n = 12) received ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement. Eight post-operative pain assessments were performed using the University of Melbourne Pain Scale (UMPS) and an algometer. Rescue analgesia was administered based on UMPS scoring. For data analysis, the Shapiro–Wilk test of normality, chi-square, Student t test and Split Plot analysis were used. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: Rescue analgesia was administered to one dog in group L, one in group Rmid and one in group Rpost, with no significant differences detected. Compared to group Rmid, group L dogs exhibited significantly higher mean mechanical pain thresholds (<i>p</i> = 0.049) and lower mean UMPS scores (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Group Rpost dogs had statistically significantly higher mean pain thresholds compared to group Rmid (<i>p</i> = 0.009). Clinical Implications: When performed after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement, lidocaine HB seems to be more effective than ropivacaine HB in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures. The administration of ropivacaine HB after osteosynthesis material placement seems to be more effective than administration after fracture reduction and before osteosynthesis material placement or administration before fracture reduction in controlling post-operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long-bone fractures.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2858analgesiadoghematoma blocklidocainelocal anaestheticsropivacaine
spellingShingle Irene Dimopoulou
Tilemachos Anagnostou
Ioannis Savvas
Panagiota Karamichali
Nikitas Prassinos
Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
Animals
analgesia
dog
hematoma block
lidocaine
local anaesthetics
ropivacaine
title Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
title_full Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
title_fullStr Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
title_short Comparison between the Effect of Lidocaine or Ropivacaine Hematoma Block and of Different Timings of Administration on Post-Operative Pain in Dogs Undergoing Osteosynthesis of Long-Bone Fractures
title_sort comparison between the effect of lidocaine or ropivacaine hematoma block and of different timings of administration on post operative pain in dogs undergoing osteosynthesis of long bone fractures
topic analgesia
dog
hematoma block
lidocaine
local anaesthetics
ropivacaine
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/18/2858
work_keys_str_mv AT irenedimopoulou comparisonbetweentheeffectoflidocaineorropivacainehematomablockandofdifferenttimingsofadministrationonpostoperativepainindogsundergoingosteosynthesisoflongbonefractures
AT tilemachosanagnostou comparisonbetweentheeffectoflidocaineorropivacainehematomablockandofdifferenttimingsofadministrationonpostoperativepainindogsundergoingosteosynthesisoflongbonefractures
AT ioannissavvas comparisonbetweentheeffectoflidocaineorropivacainehematomablockandofdifferenttimingsofadministrationonpostoperativepainindogsundergoingosteosynthesisoflongbonefractures
AT panagiotakaramichali comparisonbetweentheeffectoflidocaineorropivacainehematomablockandofdifferenttimingsofadministrationonpostoperativepainindogsundergoingosteosynthesisoflongbonefractures
AT nikitasprassinos comparisonbetweentheeffectoflidocaineorropivacainehematomablockandofdifferenttimingsofadministrationonpostoperativepainindogsundergoingosteosynthesisoflongbonefractures