Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning
Data collected over a 30-year period from an experiment replicated across 21 locations in western Canada are used to explore the effects of precommercial thinning of trembling aspen to a range of densities in combination with three initial white spruce densities on tree growth and stand dynamics. In...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-01-01
|
| Series: | Forests |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/2/223 |
| _version_ | 1797298248168243200 |
|---|---|
| author | Philip G. Comeau Mike Bokalo |
| author_facet | Philip G. Comeau Mike Bokalo |
| author_sort | Philip G. Comeau |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Data collected over a 30-year period from an experiment replicated across 21 locations in western Canada are used to explore the effects of precommercial thinning of trembling aspen to a range of densities in combination with three initial white spruce densities on tree growth and stand dynamics. Increasing differentiation amongst the 15 treatments was observed with age after thinning for both spruce and aspen responses. Spruce height and diameter declined with increasing aspen density. At age 10 spruce diameter with no aspen was 1.5× that of spruce in unthinned while it was 2.6× that of spruce in unthinned at age 28. Following thinning aspen DBH and crown width declined with increasing density of retained aspen while slenderness and height to crown base of aspen increased. Thinning to 1500 aspen·ha<sup>−1</sup> resulted in aspen DBH that was 22% larger relative to the unthinned at age 28. Spruce volume and stemwood biomass at age 90, estimated using the Mixedwood Growth Model (MGM21), declined with increasing initial aspen density, with the complete removal of aspen resulting in nearly double the spruce volume of unthinned plots. However, total stand volume, total stand biomass, and stemwood carbon at age 90 are predicted to be largest in mixed stands with aspen densities of 1500 stems·ha<sup>−1</sup> or higher. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T22:33:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-eb2224b1889e45e4a29668a4e7dd9b93 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1999-4907 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T22:33:05Z |
| publishDate | 2024-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Forests |
| spelling | doaj.art-eb2224b1889e45e4a29668a4e7dd9b932024-02-23T15:16:39ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072024-01-0115222310.3390/f15020223Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial ThinningPhilip G. Comeau0Mike Bokalo1Department of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, CanadaDepartment of Renewable Resources, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, CanadaData collected over a 30-year period from an experiment replicated across 21 locations in western Canada are used to explore the effects of precommercial thinning of trembling aspen to a range of densities in combination with three initial white spruce densities on tree growth and stand dynamics. Increasing differentiation amongst the 15 treatments was observed with age after thinning for both spruce and aspen responses. Spruce height and diameter declined with increasing aspen density. At age 10 spruce diameter with no aspen was 1.5× that of spruce in unthinned while it was 2.6× that of spruce in unthinned at age 28. Following thinning aspen DBH and crown width declined with increasing density of retained aspen while slenderness and height to crown base of aspen increased. Thinning to 1500 aspen·ha<sup>−1</sup> resulted in aspen DBH that was 22% larger relative to the unthinned at age 28. Spruce volume and stemwood biomass at age 90, estimated using the Mixedwood Growth Model (MGM21), declined with increasing initial aspen density, with the complete removal of aspen resulting in nearly double the spruce volume of unthinned plots. However, total stand volume, total stand biomass, and stemwood carbon at age 90 are predicted to be largest in mixed stands with aspen densities of 1500 stems·ha<sup>−1</sup> or higher.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/2/223trembling aspen<i>Populus tremuloides</i>white spruce<i>Picea glauca</i>boreal mixedwoodsprecommercial thinning |
| spellingShingle | Philip G. Comeau Mike Bokalo Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning Forests trembling aspen <i>Populus tremuloides</i> white spruce <i>Picea glauca</i> boreal mixedwoods precommercial thinning |
| title | Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning |
| title_full | Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning |
| title_fullStr | Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning |
| title_full_unstemmed | Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning |
| title_short | Aspen and Spruce Densities Affect Tree Size, Future Stand Volume, and Aboveground Carbon Following Precommercial Thinning |
| title_sort | aspen and spruce densities affect tree size future stand volume and aboveground carbon following precommercial thinning |
| topic | trembling aspen <i>Populus tremuloides</i> white spruce <i>Picea glauca</i> boreal mixedwoods precommercial thinning |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/15/2/223 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT philipgcomeau aspenandsprucedensitiesaffecttreesizefuturestandvolumeandabovegroundcarbonfollowingprecommercialthinning AT mikebokalo aspenandsprucedensitiesaffecttreesizefuturestandvolumeandabovegroundcarbonfollowingprecommercialthinning |