Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance

Background Microsurgical techniques are considered standard procedures in reconstructive surgery. Although microsurgery by itself is defined as surgery aided by optical magnification, there are no guidelines for determining in which clinical situations a microscope or loupe should be used. Therefor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harald Schoeffl, Davide Lazzeri, Richard Schnelzer, Stefan M. Froschauer, Georg M. Huemer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. 2013-03-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.104
_version_ 1811298387713064960
author Harald Schoeffl
Davide Lazzeri
Richard Schnelzer
Stefan M. Froschauer
Georg M. Huemer
author_facet Harald Schoeffl
Davide Lazzeri
Richard Schnelzer
Stefan M. Froschauer
Georg M. Huemer
author_sort Harald Schoeffl
collection DOAJ
description Background Microsurgical techniques are considered standard procedures in reconstructive surgery. Although microsurgery by itself is defined as surgery aided by optical magnification, there are no guidelines for determining in which clinical situations a microscope or loupe should be used. Therefore, we conducted standardized experiments to objectively assess the impact of optical magnification in microsurgery. Methods Sixteen participants of microsurgical training courses had to complete 2 sets of experiments. Each set had to be performed with an unaided eye, surgical loupes, and a regular operating microscope. The first set of experiments included coaptation of a chicken femoral nerve, and the second set consisted of anastomosing porcine coronary arteries. Evaluation of the sutured nerves and vessels were performed by 2 experienced microsurgeons using an operating microscope. Results The 16 participants of the study completed all of the experiments. The nerve coaptation and vascular anastomoses exercises showed a direct relationship of error frequency and lower optical magnification, meaning that the highest number of microsurgical errors occurred with the unaided eye. For nerve coaptation, there was a strong relationship (P<0.05) between the number of mistakes and magnification, and this relationship was very strong (P<0.01) for vascular anastomoses. Conclusions We were able to prove that microsurgical success is directly related to optical magnification. The human eye's ability to discriminate potentially important anatomical structures is limited, which might be detrimental for clinical results. Although not legally mandatory, surgeries such as reparative surgery after hand trauma should be conducted with magnifying devices for achieving optimal patient outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T06:19:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb33cfb3259f46cd860ce3a8a4a00e16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T06:19:28Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
record_format Article
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
spelling doaj.art-eb33cfb3259f46cd860ce3a8a4a00e162022-12-22T02:58:43ZengThieme Medical Publishers, Inc.Archives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712013-03-01400210410810.5999/aps.2013.40.2.104Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality AssuranceHarald Schoeffl0Davide Lazzeri1Richard Schnelzer2Stefan M. Froschauer3Georg M. Huemer4Department of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital Linz, Linz, Austriamaz - Microsurgical Training Center, Linz, AustriaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital Linz, Linz, AustriaDepartment of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital Linz, Linz, Austriamaz - Microsurgical Training Center, Linz, AustriaBackground Microsurgical techniques are considered standard procedures in reconstructive surgery. Although microsurgery by itself is defined as surgery aided by optical magnification, there are no guidelines for determining in which clinical situations a microscope or loupe should be used. Therefore, we conducted standardized experiments to objectively assess the impact of optical magnification in microsurgery. Methods Sixteen participants of microsurgical training courses had to complete 2 sets of experiments. Each set had to be performed with an unaided eye, surgical loupes, and a regular operating microscope. The first set of experiments included coaptation of a chicken femoral nerve, and the second set consisted of anastomosing porcine coronary arteries. Evaluation of the sutured nerves and vessels were performed by 2 experienced microsurgeons using an operating microscope. Results The 16 participants of the study completed all of the experiments. The nerve coaptation and vascular anastomoses exercises showed a direct relationship of error frequency and lower optical magnification, meaning that the highest number of microsurgical errors occurred with the unaided eye. For nerve coaptation, there was a strong relationship (P<0.05) between the number of mistakes and magnification, and this relationship was very strong (P<0.01) for vascular anastomoses. Conclusions We were able to prove that microsurgical success is directly related to optical magnification. The human eye's ability to discriminate potentially important anatomical structures is limited, which might be detrimental for clinical results. Although not legally mandatory, surgeries such as reparative surgery after hand trauma should be conducted with magnifying devices for achieving optimal patient outcomes.http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.104microsurgerytrainingoptical magnificationmicroscopesurgical loupes
spellingShingle Harald Schoeffl
Davide Lazzeri
Richard Schnelzer
Stefan M. Froschauer
Georg M. Huemer
Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
Archives of Plastic Surgery
microsurgery
training
optical magnification
microscope
surgical loupes
title Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
title_full Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
title_fullStr Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
title_full_unstemmed Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
title_short Optical Magnification Should Be Mandatory for Microsurgery: Scientific Basis and Clinical Data Contributing to Quality Assurance
title_sort optical magnification should be mandatory for microsurgery scientific basis and clinical data contributing to quality assurance
topic microsurgery
training
optical magnification
microscope
surgical loupes
url http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.5999/aps.2013.40.2.104
work_keys_str_mv AT haraldschoeffl opticalmagnificationshouldbemandatoryformicrosurgeryscientificbasisandclinicaldatacontributingtoqualityassurance
AT davidelazzeri opticalmagnificationshouldbemandatoryformicrosurgeryscientificbasisandclinicaldatacontributingtoqualityassurance
AT richardschnelzer opticalmagnificationshouldbemandatoryformicrosurgeryscientificbasisandclinicaldatacontributingtoqualityassurance
AT stefanmfroschauer opticalmagnificationshouldbemandatoryformicrosurgeryscientificbasisandclinicaldatacontributingtoqualityassurance
AT georgmhuemer opticalmagnificationshouldbemandatoryformicrosurgeryscientificbasisandclinicaldatacontributingtoqualityassurance