Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.

This article shows the paradoxical relation between aesthetics and politics in Richard Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. It holds that this relation should be examined in light of the separation between the public and private realm, since only by beginning with this dichotomy can it be und...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nicolás Parra.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de los Andes 2010-04-01
Series:Revista de Estudios Sociales
Subjects:
Online Access:http://res.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/634/1.php
_version_ 1811201035404836864
author Nicolás Parra.
author_facet Nicolás Parra.
author_sort Nicolás Parra.
collection DOAJ
description This article shows the paradoxical relation between aesthetics and politics in Richard Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. It holds that this relation should be examined in light of the separation between the public and private realm, since only by beginning with this dichotomy can it be understood how aesthetics and politics are complementary and mutually excluding. The article also justifies the distinction that Rorty makes between the private and public realm by showing how things look, with regard to the relationshiop between aesthetics and politics, if we refuse this dichotomy.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:14:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb3865b242084fe7bb198fa8e03dbf17
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0123-885X
1900-5180
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:14:00Z
publishDate 2010-04-01
publisher Universidad de los Andes
record_format Article
series Revista de Estudios Sociales
spelling doaj.art-eb3865b242084fe7bb198fa8e03dbf172022-12-22T03:52:18ZengUniversidad de los AndesRevista de Estudios Sociales0123-885X1900-51802010-04-01357887Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.Nicolás Parra.This article shows the paradoxical relation between aesthetics and politics in Richard Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. It holds that this relation should be examined in light of the separation between the public and private realm, since only by beginning with this dichotomy can it be understood how aesthetics and politics are complementary and mutually excluding. The article also justifies the distinction that Rorty makes between the private and public realm by showing how things look, with regard to the relationshiop between aesthetics and politics, if we refuse this dichotomy.http://res.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/634/1.phpRortyAestheticsPoliticsNabokovOrwellPublic and Private Realm.
spellingShingle Nicolás Parra.
Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
Revista de Estudios Sociales
Rorty
Aesthetics
Politics
Nabokov
Orwell
Public and Private Realm.
title Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
title_full Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
title_fullStr Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
title_full_unstemmed Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
title_short Rorty y la paradójica relación entre estética y política.
title_sort rorty y la paradojica relacion entre estetica y politica
topic Rorty
Aesthetics
Politics
Nabokov
Orwell
Public and Private Realm.
url http://res.uniandes.edu.co/view.php/634/1.php
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolasparra rortyylaparadojicarelacionentreesteticaypolitica