Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology

The skeletal integrity of chickens is an important area of research and detailed measures are needed to better understand the influence of experimental manipulation on bone health. The objective of this experiment was to compare 2 methods to measure the superficial tibiotarsus (tibia) morphology of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Magnaterra, R. Mitchell, C.R. Angel, M. Khong, Z. McMillian, A. Snyder, S. Weimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Poultry Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579122005417
_version_ 1798045276723740672
author A. Magnaterra
R. Mitchell
C.R. Angel
M. Khong
Z. McMillian
A. Snyder
S. Weimer
author_facet A. Magnaterra
R. Mitchell
C.R. Angel
M. Khong
Z. McMillian
A. Snyder
S. Weimer
author_sort A. Magnaterra
collection DOAJ
description The skeletal integrity of chickens is an important area of research and detailed measures are needed to better understand the influence of experimental manipulation on bone health. The objective of this experiment was to compare 2 methods to measure the superficial tibiotarsus (tibia) morphology of broiler chickens collected in the wet laboratory (WL) or from digital images (DIG). The length, width at 90%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 10% of the length, proximal and distal head width, medial, lateral, and distal intercondylar groove depth (ID), and proximal head angle were measured on the right and left tibias collected from broilers in 2 experiments (E1, E2). In both experiments, tibias had a greater width at 90% of the length when measured with the WL method compared with the DIG method (P ≤ 0.04), while tibias measured with the DIG method had a greater length, distal ID, and widths at 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, of the length compared with the WL method (P < 0.0001). In E1, tibias measured with the DIG method had a greater medial, lateral, and distal ID compared with the WL method (P ≤ 0.04). In E2, compared with the DIG method, tibias measured with the WL method had a greater distal head width and lateral ID, yet a shallower distal ID (P ≤ 0.03). The use of the DIG method provided more precise measures but, due to the limitations of measures from digital images and the opportunity for more accurate measures to be collected with the WL method, the WL method is recommended to measure the superficial morphology of broiler chickens because it was more accessible and practical.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T23:18:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb4238f6d4f44830937999ce5d4b1c8b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0032-5791
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T23:18:11Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Poultry Science
spelling doaj.art-eb4238f6d4f44830937999ce5d4b1c8b2022-12-22T03:57:32ZengElsevierPoultry Science0032-57912023-01-011021102245Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphologyA. Magnaterra0R. Mitchell1C.R. Angel2M. Khong3Z. McMillian4A. Snyder5S. Weimer6Department of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USAPerdue Foods, LLC, Salisbury, MD 21801, USADepartment of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USADepartment of Animal and Avian Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA; Corresponding author:The skeletal integrity of chickens is an important area of research and detailed measures are needed to better understand the influence of experimental manipulation on bone health. The objective of this experiment was to compare 2 methods to measure the superficial tibiotarsus (tibia) morphology of broiler chickens collected in the wet laboratory (WL) or from digital images (DIG). The length, width at 90%, 75%, 50%, 25%, and 10% of the length, proximal and distal head width, medial, lateral, and distal intercondylar groove depth (ID), and proximal head angle were measured on the right and left tibias collected from broilers in 2 experiments (E1, E2). In both experiments, tibias had a greater width at 90% of the length when measured with the WL method compared with the DIG method (P ≤ 0.04), while tibias measured with the DIG method had a greater length, distal ID, and widths at 10%, 25%, 50%, and 75%, of the length compared with the WL method (P < 0.0001). In E1, tibias measured with the DIG method had a greater medial, lateral, and distal ID compared with the WL method (P ≤ 0.04). In E2, compared with the DIG method, tibias measured with the WL method had a greater distal head width and lateral ID, yet a shallower distal ID (P ≤ 0.03). The use of the DIG method provided more precise measures but, due to the limitations of measures from digital images and the opportunity for more accurate measures to be collected with the WL method, the WL method is recommended to measure the superficial morphology of broiler chickens because it was more accessible and practical.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579122005417broilermorphologytibiamethodologydigital image
spellingShingle A. Magnaterra
R. Mitchell
C.R. Angel
M. Khong
Z. McMillian
A. Snyder
S. Weimer
Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
Poultry Science
broiler
morphology
tibia
methodology
digital image
title Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
title_full Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
title_fullStr Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
title_full_unstemmed Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
title_short Research Note: Comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
title_sort research note comparison of two methods to measure broiler tibia morphology
topic broiler
morphology
tibia
methodology
digital image
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579122005417
work_keys_str_mv AT amagnaterra researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT rmitchell researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT crangel researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT mkhong researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT zmcmillian researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT asnyder researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology
AT sweimer researchnotecomparisonoftwomethodstomeasurebroilertibiamorphology