Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.

Dams have been a fundamental part of the U.S. national agenda over the past two hundred years. Recently, however, dam removal has emerged as a strategy for addressing aging, obsolete infrastructure and more than 1,100 dams have been removed since the 1970s. However, only 130 of these removals had an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Melissa M Foley, Francis J Magilligan, Christian E Torgersen, Jon J Major, Chauncey W Anderson, Patrick J Connolly, Daniel Wieferich, Patrick B Shafroth, James E Evans, Dana Infante, Laura S Craig
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5503210?pdf=render
_version_ 1819078618628751360
author Melissa M Foley
Francis J Magilligan
Christian E Torgersen
Jon J Major
Chauncey W Anderson
Patrick J Connolly
Daniel Wieferich
Patrick B Shafroth
James E Evans
Dana Infante
Laura S Craig
author_facet Melissa M Foley
Francis J Magilligan
Christian E Torgersen
Jon J Major
Chauncey W Anderson
Patrick J Connolly
Daniel Wieferich
Patrick B Shafroth
James E Evans
Dana Infante
Laura S Craig
author_sort Melissa M Foley
collection DOAJ
description Dams have been a fundamental part of the U.S. national agenda over the past two hundred years. Recently, however, dam removal has emerged as a strategy for addressing aging, obsolete infrastructure and more than 1,100 dams have been removed since the 1970s. However, only 130 of these removals had any ecological or geomorphic assessments, and fewer than half of those included before- and after-removal (BAR) studies. In addition, this growing, but limited collection of dam-removal studies is limited to distinct landscape settings. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the landscape context of existing and removed dams and assessed the biophysical responses to dam removal for 63 BAR studies. The highest concentration of removed dams was in the Northeast and Upper Midwest, and most have been removed from 3rd and 4th order streams, in low-elevation (< 500 m) and low-slope (< 5%) watersheds that have small to moderate upstream watershed areas (10-1000 km2) with a low risk of habitat degradation. Many of the BAR-studied removals also have these characteristics, suggesting that our understanding of responses to dam removals is based on a limited range of landscape settings, which limits predictive capacity in other environmental settings. Biophysical responses to dam removal varied by landscape cluster, indicating that landscape features are likely to affect biophysical responses to dam removal. However, biophysical data were not equally distributed across variables or clusters, making it difficult to determine which landscape features have the strongest effect on dam-removal response. To address the inconsistencies across dam-removal studies, we provide suggestions for prioritizing and standardizing data collection associated with dam removal activities.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T19:15:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb4fcc5398764ecea817327eafcf0f50
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T19:15:58Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-eb4fcc5398764ecea817327eafcf0f502022-12-21T18:53:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01127e018010710.1371/journal.pone.0180107Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.Melissa M FoleyFrancis J MagilliganChristian E TorgersenJon J MajorChauncey W AndersonPatrick J ConnollyDaniel WieferichPatrick B ShafrothJames E EvansDana InfanteLaura S CraigDams have been a fundamental part of the U.S. national agenda over the past two hundred years. Recently, however, dam removal has emerged as a strategy for addressing aging, obsolete infrastructure and more than 1,100 dams have been removed since the 1970s. However, only 130 of these removals had any ecological or geomorphic assessments, and fewer than half of those included before- and after-removal (BAR) studies. In addition, this growing, but limited collection of dam-removal studies is limited to distinct landscape settings. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the landscape context of existing and removed dams and assessed the biophysical responses to dam removal for 63 BAR studies. The highest concentration of removed dams was in the Northeast and Upper Midwest, and most have been removed from 3rd and 4th order streams, in low-elevation (< 500 m) and low-slope (< 5%) watersheds that have small to moderate upstream watershed areas (10-1000 km2) with a low risk of habitat degradation. Many of the BAR-studied removals also have these characteristics, suggesting that our understanding of responses to dam removals is based on a limited range of landscape settings, which limits predictive capacity in other environmental settings. Biophysical responses to dam removal varied by landscape cluster, indicating that landscape features are likely to affect biophysical responses to dam removal. However, biophysical data were not equally distributed across variables or clusters, making it difficult to determine which landscape features have the strongest effect on dam-removal response. To address the inconsistencies across dam-removal studies, we provide suggestions for prioritizing and standardizing data collection associated with dam removal activities.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5503210?pdf=render
spellingShingle Melissa M Foley
Francis J Magilligan
Christian E Torgersen
Jon J Major
Chauncey W Anderson
Patrick J Connolly
Daniel Wieferich
Patrick B Shafroth
James E Evans
Dana Infante
Laura S Craig
Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
PLoS ONE
title Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
title_full Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
title_fullStr Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
title_full_unstemmed Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
title_short Landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the United States.
title_sort landscape context and the biophysical response of rivers to dam removal in the united states
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5503210?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT melissamfoley landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT francisjmagilligan landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT christianetorgersen landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT jonjmajor landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT chaunceywanderson landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT patrickjconnolly landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT danielwieferich landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT patrickbshafroth landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT jameseevans landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT danainfante landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates
AT laurascraig landscapecontextandthebiophysicalresponseofriverstodamremovalintheunitedstates