Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
Abstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Brain and Behavior |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129 |
_version_ | 1797687664143499264 |
---|---|
author | Narges Roustaei Elahe Allahyari |
author_facet | Narges Roustaei Elahe Allahyari |
author_sort | Narges Roustaei |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to determine the differential item functioning (DIF) of the DAI‐36 measure items. Methods The DAI‐36 was completed by 950 participants. An iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression model was used to detect DIF across gender, education, and age groups. DIF analysis was done by lordif package in R3.1.3 software. Results The chi‐square statistics declared 7, 7, and 4 nonuniform DIF items, and 2, 5, and 4 uniform DIF items across gender, education, and age groups, respectively. ΔR2 was always lower than 0.07 in all uniform and nonuniform DIF items. However, Δβ1 revealed significant uniform DIF in items 1 and 8 across gender (Δβ1(item 1) = 0.0137, Δβ1(item 8) = 0.0124) and items 22 and 27 across age categories (Δβ1(item 22) = 0.0110, Δβ1(item 27) = 0.0136). Conclusions DIF items had no large magnitude or cancel out each other, so statements phrased in the DAI‐36 questionnaire have equivalent meaning across participants, regardless of their gender, education, and age groups. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:20:59Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-eb583aaedab64683a4d1facca1bcf088 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2162-3279 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:20:59Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Brain and Behavior |
spelling | doaj.art-eb583aaedab64683a4d1facca1bcf0882023-09-13T06:30:24ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792023-09-01139n/an/a10.1002/brb3.3129Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)Narges Roustaei0Elahe Allahyari1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health and Nutrition Sciences Yasuj University of Medical Sciences YasujIranDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center Birjand University of Medical Sciences BirjandIranAbstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to determine the differential item functioning (DIF) of the DAI‐36 measure items. Methods The DAI‐36 was completed by 950 participants. An iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression model was used to detect DIF across gender, education, and age groups. DIF analysis was done by lordif package in R3.1.3 software. Results The chi‐square statistics declared 7, 7, and 4 nonuniform DIF items, and 2, 5, and 4 uniform DIF items across gender, education, and age groups, respectively. ΔR2 was always lower than 0.07 in all uniform and nonuniform DIF items. However, Δβ1 revealed significant uniform DIF in items 1 and 8 across gender (Δβ1(item 1) = 0.0137, Δβ1(item 8) = 0.0124) and items 22 and 27 across age categories (Δβ1(item 22) = 0.0110, Δβ1(item 27) = 0.0136). Conclusions DIF items had no large magnitude or cancel out each other, so statements phrased in the DAI‐36 questionnaire have equivalent meaning across participants, regardless of their gender, education, and age groups.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129dental anxietydifferential item functioningpsychometric properties |
spellingShingle | Narges Roustaei Elahe Allahyari Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) Brain and Behavior dental anxiety differential item functioning psychometric properties |
title | Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) |
title_full | Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) |
title_short | Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF) |
title_sort | evaluation of psychometric properties of the dental anxiety inventory dai 36 questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic differential item functioning dif |
topic | dental anxiety differential item functioning psychometric properties |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nargesroustaei evaluationofpsychometricpropertiesofthedentalanxietyinventorydai36questionnaireusingiterativehybridordinallogisticdifferentialitemfunctioningdif AT elaheallahyari evaluationofpsychometricpropertiesofthedentalanxietyinventorydai36questionnaireusingiterativehybridordinallogisticdifferentialitemfunctioningdif |