Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)

Abstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Narges Roustaei, Elahe Allahyari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-09-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129
_version_ 1797687664143499264
author Narges Roustaei
Elahe Allahyari
author_facet Narges Roustaei
Elahe Allahyari
author_sort Narges Roustaei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to determine the differential item functioning (DIF) of the DAI‐36 measure items. Methods The DAI‐36 was completed by 950 participants. An iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression model was used to detect DIF across gender, education, and age groups. DIF analysis was done by lordif package in R3.1.3 software. Results The chi‐square statistics declared 7, 7, and 4 nonuniform DIF items, and 2, 5, and 4 uniform DIF items across gender, education, and age groups, respectively. ΔR2 was always lower than 0.07 in all uniform and nonuniform DIF items. However, Δβ1 revealed significant uniform DIF in items 1 and 8 across gender (Δβ1(item 1) = 0.0137, Δβ1(item 8) = 0.0124) and items 22 and 27 across age categories (Δβ1(item 22) = 0.0110, Δβ1(item 27) = 0.0136). Conclusions DIF items had no large magnitude or cancel out each other, so statements phrased in the DAI‐36 questionnaire have equivalent meaning across participants, regardless of their gender, education, and age groups.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T01:20:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb583aaedab64683a4d1facca1bcf088
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2162-3279
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T01:20:59Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Brain and Behavior
spelling doaj.art-eb583aaedab64683a4d1facca1bcf0882023-09-13T06:30:24ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792023-09-01139n/an/a10.1002/brb3.3129Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)Narges Roustaei0Elahe Allahyari1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health and Nutrition Sciences Yasuj University of Medical Sciences YasujIranDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Social Determinants of Health Research Center Birjand University of Medical Sciences BirjandIranAbstract Objectives Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire is an instrument for assessing dental anxiety. The different perceptions of the questionnaire items in the individual at the same level of underlying dental anxiety may lead to different reported dental anxieties. This study aims to determine the differential item functioning (DIF) of the DAI‐36 measure items. Methods The DAI‐36 was completed by 950 participants. An iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression model was used to detect DIF across gender, education, and age groups. DIF analysis was done by lordif package in R3.1.3 software. Results The chi‐square statistics declared 7, 7, and 4 nonuniform DIF items, and 2, 5, and 4 uniform DIF items across gender, education, and age groups, respectively. ΔR2 was always lower than 0.07 in all uniform and nonuniform DIF items. However, Δβ1 revealed significant uniform DIF in items 1 and 8 across gender (Δβ1(item 1) = 0.0137, Δβ1(item 8) = 0.0124) and items 22 and 27 across age categories (Δβ1(item 22) = 0.0110, Δβ1(item 27) = 0.0136). Conclusions DIF items had no large magnitude or cancel out each other, so statements phrased in the DAI‐36 questionnaire have equivalent meaning across participants, regardless of their gender, education, and age groups.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129dental anxietydifferential item functioningpsychometric properties
spellingShingle Narges Roustaei
Elahe Allahyari
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
Brain and Behavior
dental anxiety
differential item functioning
psychometric properties
title Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
title_full Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
title_fullStr Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
title_short Evaluation of psychometric properties of the Dental Anxiety Inventory (DAI‐36) questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic: Differential item functioning (DIF)
title_sort evaluation of psychometric properties of the dental anxiety inventory dai 36 questionnaire using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic differential item functioning dif
topic dental anxiety
differential item functioning
psychometric properties
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3129
work_keys_str_mv AT nargesroustaei evaluationofpsychometricpropertiesofthedentalanxietyinventorydai36questionnaireusingiterativehybridordinallogisticdifferentialitemfunctioningdif
AT elaheallahyari evaluationofpsychometricpropertiesofthedentalanxietyinventorydai36questionnaireusingiterativehybridordinallogisticdifferentialitemfunctioningdif