Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners

Abstract Several species of honeysuckle from Europe and Asia have proved to be invasive in North America, with substantial impacts on native ecosystems. Although shrubby honeysuckles of Eurasian origin have appeared on banned plant lists in North America and other parts of the world, cultivars of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darren J. Hayes, Bryan J. Peterson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS) 2020-01-01
Series:HortScience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/2/article-p149.xml
_version_ 1811289586764087296
author Darren J. Hayes
Bryan J. Peterson
author_facet Darren J. Hayes
Bryan J. Peterson
author_sort Darren J. Hayes
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Several species of honeysuckle from Europe and Asia have proved to be invasive in North America, with substantial impacts on native ecosystems. Although shrubby honeysuckles of Eurasian origin have appeared on banned plant lists in North America and other parts of the world, cultivars of the edible blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) derived from Eurasian germplasm and marketed as honeyberry, Haskap, or sweetberry honeysuckle have recently been widely developed for agricultural use in North America, with little scrutiny of invasive potential in North America despite its documented invasion of the Scandinavian Peninsula in northern Europe. To gain insight into differences in growth strategies among congeners, we compared the growth of Eurasian L. caerulea with that of a closely related congener in North America [Lonicera villosa (Michx.) R. & S.] and two known invasive congeners from Eurasia (Lonicera tatarica L. and Lonicera xylosteum L.). In Expt. 1, L. villosa, L. caerulea, and L. tatarica were grown in #1 nursery containers after top-dressing with Osmocote Pro 17–5–11 4-month controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) at rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 g CRF/container. Across all fertilizer treatments, L. caerulea outperformed L. villosa by a factor of two for root and shoot dry weights, although L. tatarica produced more growth than either of the others and was more responsive to increasing CRF. However, L. caerulea more strongly resembled L. tatarica in form, producing leaves of greater individual size and producing significantly taller primary stems than L. villosa, evidence for prioritization of competitive growth. In Expt. 2, plants of the same taxa plus L. xylosteum were grown communally in #20 nursery containers, followed by a period in which each container was subjected to regular irrigation, withheld irrigation (dry treatment), or inundation (flooded treatment). Plant growth differed substantially among taxa, but moisture treatments did not affect growth significantly. As in Expt. 1, plants of L. caerulea in Expt. 2 produced greater dry biomass than plants of L. villosa and resembled the invasive Eurasian honeysuckles more strongly in size and form. We conclude Eurasian L. caerulea is distinct in growth rate and morphology from North American L. villosa. In light of these findings, the ecology and competitive ability of Eurasian L. caerulea may not be well predicted by ecological observations of its closely related North American congener.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T03:58:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb6b76f2fc934b6195b5e2bd2d049ae9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2327-9834
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T03:58:14Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher American Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)
record_format Article
series HortScience
spelling doaj.art-eb6b76f2fc934b6195b5e2bd2d049ae92022-12-22T03:03:35ZengAmerican Society for Horticultural Science (ASHS)HortScience2327-98342020-01-01552149155https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI14318-19Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive CongenersDarren J. HayesBryan J. PetersonAbstract Several species of honeysuckle from Europe and Asia have proved to be invasive in North America, with substantial impacts on native ecosystems. Although shrubby honeysuckles of Eurasian origin have appeared on banned plant lists in North America and other parts of the world, cultivars of the edible blue honeysuckle (Lonicera caerulea L.) derived from Eurasian germplasm and marketed as honeyberry, Haskap, or sweetberry honeysuckle have recently been widely developed for agricultural use in North America, with little scrutiny of invasive potential in North America despite its documented invasion of the Scandinavian Peninsula in northern Europe. To gain insight into differences in growth strategies among congeners, we compared the growth of Eurasian L. caerulea with that of a closely related congener in North America [Lonicera villosa (Michx.) R. & S.] and two known invasive congeners from Eurasia (Lonicera tatarica L. and Lonicera xylosteum L.). In Expt. 1, L. villosa, L. caerulea, and L. tatarica were grown in #1 nursery containers after top-dressing with Osmocote Pro 17–5–11 4-month controlled-release fertilizer (CRF) at rates of 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 g CRF/container. Across all fertilizer treatments, L. caerulea outperformed L. villosa by a factor of two for root and shoot dry weights, although L. tatarica produced more growth than either of the others and was more responsive to increasing CRF. However, L. caerulea more strongly resembled L. tatarica in form, producing leaves of greater individual size and producing significantly taller primary stems than L. villosa, evidence for prioritization of competitive growth. In Expt. 2, plants of the same taxa plus L. xylosteum were grown communally in #20 nursery containers, followed by a period in which each container was subjected to regular irrigation, withheld irrigation (dry treatment), or inundation (flooded treatment). Plant growth differed substantially among taxa, but moisture treatments did not affect growth significantly. As in Expt. 1, plants of L. caerulea in Expt. 2 produced greater dry biomass than plants of L. villosa and resembled the invasive Eurasian honeysuckles more strongly in size and form. We conclude Eurasian L. caerulea is distinct in growth rate and morphology from North American L. villosa. In light of these findings, the ecology and competitive ability of Eurasian L. caerulea may not be well predicted by ecological observations of its closely related North American congener.https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/2/article-p149.xmllonicera tatarica; lonicera xylosteum; controlled-release fertilizer; honeyberry; haskap; mountain fly honeysuckle; tatarian honeysuckle; european fly honeysuckle
spellingShingle Darren J. Hayes
Bryan J. Peterson
Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
HortScience
lonicera tatarica; lonicera xylosteum; controlled-release fertilizer; honeyberry; haskap; mountain fly honeysuckle; tatarian honeysuckle; european fly honeysuckle
title Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
title_full Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
title_fullStr Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
title_full_unstemmed Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
title_short Growth of Lonicera caerulea across Fertility and Moisture Conditions: Comparisons with Lonicera villosa and Invasive Congeners
title_sort growth of lonicera caerulea across fertility and moisture conditions comparisons with lonicera villosa and invasive congeners
topic lonicera tatarica; lonicera xylosteum; controlled-release fertilizer; honeyberry; haskap; mountain fly honeysuckle; tatarian honeysuckle; european fly honeysuckle
url https://journals.ashs.org/hortsci/view/journals/hortsci/55/2/article-p149.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT darrenjhayes growthofloniceracaeruleaacrossfertilityandmoistureconditionscomparisonswithloniceravillosaandinvasivecongeners
AT bryanjpeterson growthofloniceracaeruleaacrossfertilityandmoistureconditionscomparisonswithloniceravillosaandinvasivecongeners