Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian

Subject and object relative clauses have been studied from the point of view of language acquisition and adult sentence processing. In the adult sentence processing literature, subject relative clauses (RCs) are read faster than object RCs (e.g., Frauenfelder et al. 1980 for French; King and Kutas 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Teresa Guasti, Mirta Vernice, Julie Franck
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:Languages
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/3/3/24
_version_ 1811187290954792960
author Maria Teresa Guasti
Mirta Vernice
Julie Franck
author_facet Maria Teresa Guasti
Mirta Vernice
Julie Franck
author_sort Maria Teresa Guasti
collection DOAJ
description Subject and object relative clauses have been studied from the point of view of language acquisition and adult sentence processing. In the adult sentence processing literature, subject relative clauses (RCs) are read faster than object RCs (e.g., Frauenfelder et al. 1980 for French; King and Kutas 1995 for English; Schriefers et al. 1995 for Dutch). Similarly, children understand and produce subject RCs earlier and with greater accuracy than object RCs in a variety of languages with head-initial relative clauses, as English, Hebrew and Italian. These findings cannot be a coincidence but reflect the fact that what children acquire first is also easier to process by adults. In this article, we support this observation by investigating subject and object RCs in children and adults speaking French and Italian. These languages display subject and object relatives as in (1), but they also have a type of object relative in which the subject is postverbal. We replicate the observation that subject relatives are easier than object and show that object relatives as in (1b), with the embedded subject in preverbal position are easier than those with the embedded subject in postverbal position, both for children and adults. We offer an account of these findings in terms of Fodor and Inoue’s (2000) diagnosis model in light of the fact that acquisition involves processing.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T14:00:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb773ce4213f46f0bfa26e648825a920
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-471X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T14:00:55Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Languages
spelling doaj.art-eb773ce4213f46f0bfa26e648825a9202022-12-22T04:20:08ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2018-07-01332410.3390/languages3030024languages3030024Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and ItalianMaria Teresa Guasti0Mirta Vernice1Julie Franck2Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 20126 Milano, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza dell’Ateneo Nuovo, 20126 Milano, ItalyFaculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Geneva, Boulevard du Pont-d’Arve 40, 1211 Geneva 4, SwitzerlandSubject and object relative clauses have been studied from the point of view of language acquisition and adult sentence processing. In the adult sentence processing literature, subject relative clauses (RCs) are read faster than object RCs (e.g., Frauenfelder et al. 1980 for French; King and Kutas 1995 for English; Schriefers et al. 1995 for Dutch). Similarly, children understand and produce subject RCs earlier and with greater accuracy than object RCs in a variety of languages with head-initial relative clauses, as English, Hebrew and Italian. These findings cannot be a coincidence but reflect the fact that what children acquire first is also easier to process by adults. In this article, we support this observation by investigating subject and object RCs in children and adults speaking French and Italian. These languages display subject and object relatives as in (1), but they also have a type of object relative in which the subject is postverbal. We replicate the observation that subject relatives are easier than object and show that object relatives as in (1b), with the embedded subject in preverbal position are easier than those with the embedded subject in postverbal position, both for children and adults. We offer an account of these findings in terms of Fodor and Inoue’s (2000) diagnosis model in light of the fact that acquisition involves processing.http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/3/3/24relative clauseschildrenadultsprocessingFrenchItalian
spellingShingle Maria Teresa Guasti
Mirta Vernice
Julie Franck
Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
Languages
relative clauses
children
adults
processing
French
Italian
title Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
title_full Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
title_fullStr Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
title_full_unstemmed Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
title_short Continuity in the Adult and Children’s Comprehension of Subject and Object Relative Clauses in French and Italian
title_sort continuity in the adult and children s comprehension of subject and object relative clauses in french and italian
topic relative clauses
children
adults
processing
French
Italian
url http://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/3/3/24
work_keys_str_mv AT mariateresaguasti continuityintheadultandchildrenscomprehensionofsubjectandobjectrelativeclausesinfrenchanditalian
AT mirtavernice continuityintheadultandchildrenscomprehensionofsubjectandobjectrelativeclausesinfrenchanditalian
AT juliefranck continuityintheadultandchildrenscomprehensionofsubjectandobjectrelativeclausesinfrenchanditalian