Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults

Cross-sectional size of a long bone shaft influences its mechanical properties. We recently used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) to create reference data for size measures of the radial and tibial diaphyses. However, data did not take into account the impact of b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stuart J. Warden, Robyn K. Fuchs, Ziyue Liu, Katelynn R. Toloday, Rachel Surowiec, Sharon M. Moe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-03-01
Series:Bone Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000020
_version_ 1797247841611022336
author Stuart J. Warden
Robyn K. Fuchs
Ziyue Liu
Katelynn R. Toloday
Rachel Surowiec
Sharon M. Moe
author_facet Stuart J. Warden
Robyn K. Fuchs
Ziyue Liu
Katelynn R. Toloday
Rachel Surowiec
Sharon M. Moe
author_sort Stuart J. Warden
collection DOAJ
description Cross-sectional size of a long bone shaft influences its mechanical properties. We recently used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) to create reference data for size measures of the radial and tibial diaphyses. However, data did not take into account the impact of bone length. Human bone exhibits relatively isometric allometry whereby cross-sectional area increases proportionally with bone length. The consequence is that taller than average individuals will generally have larger z-scores for bone size outcomes when length is not considered. The goal of the current work was to develop a means of determining whether an individual's cross-sectional bone size is suitable for their bone length. HRpQCT scans performed at 30 % of bone length proximal from the distal end of the radius and tibia were acquired from 1034 White females (age = 18.0 to 85.3 y) and 392 White males (age = 18.4 to 83.6 y). Positive relationships were confirmed between bone length and cross-sectional areas and estimated mechanical properties. Scaling factors were calculated and used to scale HRpQCT outcomes to bone length. Centile curves were generated for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT data using the LMS approach. Excel-based calculators are provided to facilitate calculation of z-scores for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT outcomes. The raw z-scores indicate the magnitude that an individual's HRpQCT outcomes differ relative to expected sex- and age-specific values, with the scaled z-scores also considering bone length. The latter enables it to be determined whether an individual or population of interest has normal sized bones for their length, which may have implications for injury risk. In addition to providing a means of expressing HRpQCT bone size outcomes relative to bone length, the current study also provides centile curves for outcomes previously without reference data, including tissue mineral density and moments of inertia.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:32:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb77cb534f2648f6a662c09a72aa7cec
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-1872
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T20:05:06Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Bone Reports
spelling doaj.art-eb77cb534f2648f6a662c09a72aa7cec2024-03-24T06:59:11ZengElsevierBone Reports2352-18722024-03-0120101735Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adultsStuart J. Warden0Robyn K. Fuchs1Ziyue Liu2Katelynn R. Toloday3Rachel Surowiec4Sharon M. Moe5Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America; Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America; Corresponding author at: Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, 1140 W. Michigan St., CF-120, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States of America.Indiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America; College of Osteopathic Medicine, Marian University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of AmericaIndiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America; Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of AmericaDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Human Sciences, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of AmericaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of AmericaIndiana Center for Musculoskeletal Health, Indiana University, IN, United States of America; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States of AmericaCross-sectional size of a long bone shaft influences its mechanical properties. We recently used high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HRpQCT) to create reference data for size measures of the radial and tibial diaphyses. However, data did not take into account the impact of bone length. Human bone exhibits relatively isometric allometry whereby cross-sectional area increases proportionally with bone length. The consequence is that taller than average individuals will generally have larger z-scores for bone size outcomes when length is not considered. The goal of the current work was to develop a means of determining whether an individual's cross-sectional bone size is suitable for their bone length. HRpQCT scans performed at 30 % of bone length proximal from the distal end of the radius and tibia were acquired from 1034 White females (age = 18.0 to 85.3 y) and 392 White males (age = 18.4 to 83.6 y). Positive relationships were confirmed between bone length and cross-sectional areas and estimated mechanical properties. Scaling factors were calculated and used to scale HRpQCT outcomes to bone length. Centile curves were generated for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT data using the LMS approach. Excel-based calculators are provided to facilitate calculation of z-scores for both raw and bone length scaled HRpQCT outcomes. The raw z-scores indicate the magnitude that an individual's HRpQCT outcomes differ relative to expected sex- and age-specific values, with the scaled z-scores also considering bone length. The latter enables it to be determined whether an individual or population of interest has normal sized bones for their length, which may have implications for injury risk. In addition to providing a means of expressing HRpQCT bone size outcomes relative to bone length, the current study also provides centile curves for outcomes previously without reference data, including tissue mineral density and moments of inertia.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000020Bone allometryBone strengthCortical boneNormative dataOsteoporosis
spellingShingle Stuart J. Warden
Robyn K. Fuchs
Ziyue Liu
Katelynn R. Toloday
Rachel Surowiec
Sharon M. Moe
Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
Bone Reports
Bone allometry
Bone strength
Cortical bone
Normative data
Osteoporosis
title Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
title_full Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
title_fullStr Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
title_full_unstemmed Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
title_short Am I big boned? Bone length scaled reference data for HRpQCT measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in White adults
title_sort am i big boned bone length scaled reference data for hrpqct measures of the radial and tibial diaphysis in white adults
topic Bone allometry
Bone strength
Cortical bone
Normative data
Osteoporosis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352187224000020
work_keys_str_mv AT stuartjwarden amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults
AT robynkfuchs amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults
AT ziyueliu amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults
AT katelynnrtoloday amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults
AT rachelsurowiec amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults
AT sharonmmoe amibigbonedbonelengthscaledreferencedataforhrpqctmeasuresoftheradialandtibialdiaphysisinwhiteadults