A Prospective Pilot Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Argatroban (Argatra<sup>®</sup>) in Critically Ill Patients with Heparin Resistance <xref rid="fn1-jcm-748765" ref-type="fn">†</xref>

The current study aims to evaluate whether prophylactic anticoagulation using argatroban or an increased dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is effective in achieving the targeted activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of more than 45 s in critically ill heparin-resistant (HR) patients. Patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mirjam Bachler, Tobias Hell, Johannes Bösch, Benedikt Treml, Bettina Schenk, Benjamin Treichl, Barbara Friesenecker, Ingo Lorenz, Daniel Stengg, Stefan Hruby, Bernd Wallner, Elgar Oswald, Mathias Ströhle, Christian Niederwanger, Christian Irsara, Dietmar Fries
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/4/963
Description
Summary:The current study aims to evaluate whether prophylactic anticoagulation using argatroban or an increased dose of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is effective in achieving the targeted activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) of more than 45 s in critically ill heparin-resistant (HR) patients. Patients were randomized either to continue receiving an increased dose of UFH, or to be treated with argatroban. The endpoints were defined as achieving an aPTT target of more than 45 s at 7 h and 24 h. This clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01734252) and on EudraCT (2012-000487-23). A total of 42 patients, 20 patients in the heparin and 22 in the argatroban group, were included. Of the patients with continued heparin treatment 55% achieved the target aPTT at 7 h, while only 40% of this group maintained the target aPTT after 24 h. Of the argatroban group 59% reached the target aPTT at 7 h, while at 24 h 86% of these patients maintained the targeted aPTT. Treatment success at 7 h did not differ between the groups (<i>p</i> = 0.1000), whereas at 24 h argatroban showed significantly greater efficacy (<i>p</i> = 0.0021) than did heparin. Argatroban also worked better in maintaining adequate anticoagulation in the further course of the study. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of bleeding or thromboembolic complications between the treatment groups. In the case of heparin-resistant critically ill patients, argatroban showed greater efficacy than did an increased dose of heparin in achieving adequate anticoagulation at 24 h and in maintaining the targeted aPTT goal throughout the treatment phase.
ISSN:2077-0383