One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”

High-stakes examinations are an integral part of medical education. To practice in the United States (U.S.), students must pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring on January 26, 2022, a worldwide debate regarding how residency pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph R. Geraghty, Sarah M. Russel, Hilary Renaldy, Trevonne M. Thompson, Laura E. Hirshfield
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897523/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811170974444290048
author Joseph R. Geraghty
Sarah M. Russel
Hilary Renaldy
Trevonne M. Thompson
Laura E. Hirshfield
author_facet Joseph R. Geraghty
Sarah M. Russel
Hilary Renaldy
Trevonne M. Thompson
Laura E. Hirshfield
author_sort Joseph R. Geraghty
collection DOAJ
description High-stakes examinations are an integral part of medical education. To practice in the United States (U.S.), students must pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring on January 26, 2022, a worldwide debate regarding how residency program directors will view the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) exam emerged. Here, the authors explore the role of formal, informal, and hidden curricula related to USMLE, with broader implications for high-stakes examinations. Six focus groups of fourth-year students who recently took Step 2 CK and a supplemental curricular content analysis were conducted to explore students’ decision-making and emotions regarding the exam, including how the formal, informal, and hidden curricula influence their perspectives. Participants highlighted how informal and hidden curricula drive the belief that high-stakes examinations are the single most important factor in medical school. Prior experience with Step 1 drives behaviors and attitudes when preparing for Step 2 CK. Pressures from these examinations have unintended consequences on burnout, professional identity, specialty choice, and interpersonal interactions. Both interpersonal interactions within medical education as well as subconscious, unintended messaging can influence medical student approaches to and perspectives about high-stakes examinations. Within the context of U.S. medical training, with the transition to a new era of a pass/fail Step 1 examination, careful consideration to prevent shifting the current “Step 1 mania” to a “Step 2 CK mania” is warranted. More broadly, medical educators must examine the unintended yet potentially damaging pressures institutions generate in their medical trainees in relation to high-stakes examinations.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:05:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eb8ce687394540e79b91e3fd4a51449b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:05:43Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-eb8ce687394540e79b91e3fd4a51449b2023-02-06T05:31:07ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01182One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”Joseph R. GeraghtySarah M. RusselHilary RenaldyTrevonne M. ThompsonLaura E. HirshfieldHigh-stakes examinations are an integral part of medical education. To practice in the United States (U.S.), students must pass the U.S. Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLE). With the transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail scoring on January 26, 2022, a worldwide debate regarding how residency program directors will view the Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) exam emerged. Here, the authors explore the role of formal, informal, and hidden curricula related to USMLE, with broader implications for high-stakes examinations. Six focus groups of fourth-year students who recently took Step 2 CK and a supplemental curricular content analysis were conducted to explore students’ decision-making and emotions regarding the exam, including how the formal, informal, and hidden curricula influence their perspectives. Participants highlighted how informal and hidden curricula drive the belief that high-stakes examinations are the single most important factor in medical school. Prior experience with Step 1 drives behaviors and attitudes when preparing for Step 2 CK. Pressures from these examinations have unintended consequences on burnout, professional identity, specialty choice, and interpersonal interactions. Both interpersonal interactions within medical education as well as subconscious, unintended messaging can influence medical student approaches to and perspectives about high-stakes examinations. Within the context of U.S. medical training, with the transition to a new era of a pass/fail Step 1 examination, careful consideration to prevent shifting the current “Step 1 mania” to a “Step 2 CK mania” is warranted. More broadly, medical educators must examine the unintended yet potentially damaging pressures institutions generate in their medical trainees in relation to high-stakes examinations.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897523/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Joseph R. Geraghty
Sarah M. Russel
Hilary Renaldy
Trevonne M. Thompson
Laura E. Hirshfield
One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
PLoS ONE
title One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
title_full One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
title_fullStr One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
title_full_unstemmed One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
title_short One test to rule them all: A qualitative study of formal, informal, and hidden curricula as drivers of USMLE “exam mania”
title_sort one test to rule them all a qualitative study of formal informal and hidden curricula as drivers of usmle exam mania
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9897523/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT josephrgeraghty onetesttorulethemallaqualitativestudyofformalinformalandhiddencurriculaasdriversofusmleexammania
AT sarahmrussel onetesttorulethemallaqualitativestudyofformalinformalandhiddencurriculaasdriversofusmleexammania
AT hilaryrenaldy onetesttorulethemallaqualitativestudyofformalinformalandhiddencurriculaasdriversofusmleexammania
AT trevonnemthompson onetesttorulethemallaqualitativestudyofformalinformalandhiddencurriculaasdriversofusmleexammania
AT lauraehirshfield onetesttorulethemallaqualitativestudyofformalinformalandhiddencurriculaasdriversofusmleexammania