Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis

Research on the microbiomes of animals has increased substantially within the past decades. More recently, microbial analyses of aquatic invertebrates have become of increased interest. The storage method used while collecting aquatic invertebrates has not been standardized throughout the scientific...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephanie N. Vaughn, Colin R. Jackson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-04-01
Series:Microorganisms
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/4/811
_version_ 1797409986602598400
author Stephanie N. Vaughn
Colin R. Jackson
author_facet Stephanie N. Vaughn
Colin R. Jackson
author_sort Stephanie N. Vaughn
collection DOAJ
description Research on the microbiomes of animals has increased substantially within the past decades. More recently, microbial analyses of aquatic invertebrates have become of increased interest. The storage method used while collecting aquatic invertebrates has not been standardized throughout the scientific community, and the effects of common storage methods on the microbial composition of the organism is unknown. Using crayfish and dragonfly nymphs collected from a natural pond and crayfish maintained in an aquarium, the effects of two common storage methods, preserving in 95% ethanol and freezing at −20 °C, on the invertebrate bacterial microbiome was evaluated. We found that the bacterial community was conserved for two sample types (gut and exoskeleton) of field-collected crayfish stored either in ethanol or frozen, as was the gut microbiome of aquarium crayfish. However, there were significant differences between the bacterial communities found on the exoskeleton of aquarium crayfish stored in ethanol compared to those that were frozen. Dragonfly nymphs showed significant differences in gut microbial composition between species, but the microbiome was conserved between storage methods. These results demonstrate that preserving field-collected specimens of aquatic invertebrates in 95% ethanol is likely to be a simple and effective sample preservation method for subsequent gut microbiome analysis but is less reliable for the external microbiome.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:23:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eba044a36f7349709cd6f483068b7da0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2607
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:23:24Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Microorganisms
spelling doaj.art-eba044a36f7349709cd6f483068b7da02023-12-03T13:45:13ZengMDPI AGMicroorganisms2076-26072022-04-0110481110.3390/microorganisms10040811Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome AnalysisStephanie N. Vaughn0Colin R. Jackson1Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USADepartment of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677, USAResearch on the microbiomes of animals has increased substantially within the past decades. More recently, microbial analyses of aquatic invertebrates have become of increased interest. The storage method used while collecting aquatic invertebrates has not been standardized throughout the scientific community, and the effects of common storage methods on the microbial composition of the organism is unknown. Using crayfish and dragonfly nymphs collected from a natural pond and crayfish maintained in an aquarium, the effects of two common storage methods, preserving in 95% ethanol and freezing at −20 °C, on the invertebrate bacterial microbiome was evaluated. We found that the bacterial community was conserved for two sample types (gut and exoskeleton) of field-collected crayfish stored either in ethanol or frozen, as was the gut microbiome of aquarium crayfish. However, there were significant differences between the bacterial communities found on the exoskeleton of aquarium crayfish stored in ethanol compared to those that were frozen. Dragonfly nymphs showed significant differences in gut microbial composition between species, but the microbiome was conserved between storage methods. These results demonstrate that preserving field-collected specimens of aquatic invertebrates in 95% ethanol is likely to be a simple and effective sample preservation method for subsequent gut microbiome analysis but is less reliable for the external microbiome.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/4/811invertebratemicrobiomesample preservationcrayfishdragonfly
spellingShingle Stephanie N. Vaughn
Colin R. Jackson
Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
Microorganisms
invertebrate
microbiome
sample preservation
crayfish
dragonfly
title Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
title_full Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
title_short Evaluating Methods of Preserving Aquatic Invertebrates for Microbiome Analysis
title_sort evaluating methods of preserving aquatic invertebrates for microbiome analysis
topic invertebrate
microbiome
sample preservation
crayfish
dragonfly
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/10/4/811
work_keys_str_mv AT stephanienvaughn evaluatingmethodsofpreservingaquaticinvertebratesformicrobiomeanalysis
AT colinrjackson evaluatingmethodsofpreservingaquaticinvertebratesformicrobiomeanalysis