Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)

Osteoprogenitor cells contribute to the development and maintenance of skeletal tissues. Bats are unique model taxa whose cellular processes are poorly understood, especially in regards to skeletal biology. Forelimb bones of bats, unlike those of terrestrial mammals, bend during flight and function...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H.C. Ball, F.M. Moussa, T. Mbimba, R. Orman, F.F. Safadi, L.N. Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-07-01
Series:Stem Cell Research
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506116300472
_version_ 1819110282535895040
author H.C. Ball
F.M. Moussa
T. Mbimba
R. Orman
F.F. Safadi
L.N. Cooper
author_facet H.C. Ball
F.M. Moussa
T. Mbimba
R. Orman
F.F. Safadi
L.N. Cooper
author_sort H.C. Ball
collection DOAJ
description Osteoprogenitor cells contribute to the development and maintenance of skeletal tissues. Bats are unique model taxa whose cellular processes are poorly understood, especially in regards to skeletal biology. Forelimb bones of bats, unlike those of terrestrial mammals, bend during flight and function in controlled deformation. As a first step towards understanding the molecular processes governing deposition of this flexible bone matrix, we provide the first method for isolation and differentiation of cell populations derived from the bone marrow and cortical bone of bats, and compare results with those harvested from C57BL/6J mice. Osteogenic capacity of these cells was assessed via absolute quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and through quantification of in vitro mineral deposition. Results indicate the differentiated bone cells of bats display significantly lower gene expression of known osteogenic markers (Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX2), osteocalcin (BGLAP) and osterix (SP7)), and deposit a less-mineralized matrix compared with murine controls. By characterizing the in vitro performance of osteoprogenitor cells throughout differentiation and matrix production, this study lays the ground work for in vitro manipulations of bat stem and osteoprogenitor cells and extends our understanding of the cellular diversity across mammals that occupy different habitats.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T03:39:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ebae2635516c4b16a9742049524f6abb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1873-5061
1876-7753
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T03:39:15Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Stem Cell Research
spelling doaj.art-ebae2635516c4b16a9742049524f6abb2022-12-21T18:40:18ZengElsevierStem Cell Research1873-50611876-77532016-07-01171546110.1016/j.scr.2016.05.009Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)H.C. Ball0F.M. Moussa1T. Mbimba2R. Orman3F.F. Safadi4L.N. Cooper5Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH 44272, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH 44272, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH 44272, United StatesDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York, 450 Clarkson Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11203, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH 44272, United StatesDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Northeast Ohio Medical University, 4209 State Route 44, Rootstown, OH 44272, United StatesOsteoprogenitor cells contribute to the development and maintenance of skeletal tissues. Bats are unique model taxa whose cellular processes are poorly understood, especially in regards to skeletal biology. Forelimb bones of bats, unlike those of terrestrial mammals, bend during flight and function in controlled deformation. As a first step towards understanding the molecular processes governing deposition of this flexible bone matrix, we provide the first method for isolation and differentiation of cell populations derived from the bone marrow and cortical bone of bats, and compare results with those harvested from C57BL/6J mice. Osteogenic capacity of these cells was assessed via absolute quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) and through quantification of in vitro mineral deposition. Results indicate the differentiated bone cells of bats display significantly lower gene expression of known osteogenic markers (Runt-related transcription factor (RUNX2), osteocalcin (BGLAP) and osterix (SP7)), and deposit a less-mineralized matrix compared with murine controls. By characterizing the in vitro performance of osteoprogenitor cells throughout differentiation and matrix production, this study lays the ground work for in vitro manipulations of bat stem and osteoprogenitor cells and extends our understanding of the cellular diversity across mammals that occupy different habitats.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506116300472
spellingShingle H.C. Ball
F.M. Moussa
T. Mbimba
R. Orman
F.F. Safadi
L.N. Cooper
Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
Stem Cell Research
title Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
title_full Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
title_fullStr Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
title_full_unstemmed Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
title_short Methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)
title_sort methods and insights from the characterization of osteoprogenitor cells of bats mammalia chiroptera
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873506116300472
work_keys_str_mv AT hcball methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera
AT fmmoussa methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera
AT tmbimba methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera
AT rorman methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera
AT ffsafadi methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera
AT lncooper methodsandinsightsfromthecharacterizationofosteoprogenitorcellsofbatsmammaliachiroptera