Decision support system for solving the street routing problem

Servicing a large number of customers in a city zone is often a considerable part of many logistics chains. The capacity of one delivery vehicle is limited, but, at the same time, it usually serves plenty of customers. This problem is often called a Street Routing Problem (SRP). Key differences betw...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: P. Matis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Vilnius Gediminas Technical University 2008-09-01
Series:Transport
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.transport.vgtu.lt/upload/tif_zur/2008-3-matis.pdf
_version_ 1818438580918288384
author P. Matis
author_facet P. Matis
author_sort P. Matis
collection DOAJ
description Servicing a large number of customers in a city zone is often a considerable part of many logistics chains. The capacity of one delivery vehicle is limited, but, at the same time, it usually serves plenty of customers. This problem is often called a Street Routing Problem (SRP). Key differences between Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) and SRP are presented here. The main problem of SRP is that when the number of customers is huge, the number of delivery path combinations becomes enormous. As the experimental results show in the case of SRP the error on the length of delivery routes based on an expert’s judgment when compared to the optimal solution is in the range of 10–25%. As presented in the paper, only using decision support systems such as Geographical Information Systems (GIS) makes possible to effectively manage SRP. Besides classical measurements used in VRP, such as total length of routes or time required for delivery in each route, other measurements, mostly qualitative ones, are presented. All of these are named as visual attractiveness. This paper discusses possible relationships between quantitative and qualitative measurements that give a promise for finding better solutions of SRP. Several new types of heuristics for solving SRP are evaluated and afterward compared using the real data. One of the key properties of GIS to use routing software is its flexible interactive and user-friendly environment. Routing software can find a good solution and explore the possibilities while an expert later can change the calculated routes to explore other possibilities based on the expert’s judgment. This paper presents a practical use of new heuristics with the ArcView and solution of address mail for several cities in Slovakia served by Slovak Post ltd. Other Decision Support Systems that solve SRP are presented as TRANSCAD developed by Caliper Corporation or GeoRoute promoted by Canadian Post and GIRO.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T17:42:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ebb99ed05354403393a1de4b0dfce8b8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1648-4142
1648-3480
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T17:42:50Z
publishDate 2008-09-01
publisher Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
record_format Article
series Transport
spelling doaj.art-ebb99ed05354403393a1de4b0dfce8b82022-12-21T22:52:49ZengVilnius Gediminas Technical UniversityTransport1648-41421648-34802008-09-01233230235Decision support system for solving the street routing problemP. MatisServicing a large number of customers in a city zone is often a considerable part of many logistics chains. The capacity of one delivery vehicle is limited, but, at the same time, it usually serves plenty of customers. This problem is often called a Street Routing Problem (SRP). Key differences between Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) and SRP are presented here. The main problem of SRP is that when the number of customers is huge, the number of delivery path combinations becomes enormous. As the experimental results show in the case of SRP the error on the length of delivery routes based on an expert’s judgment when compared to the optimal solution is in the range of 10–25%. As presented in the paper, only using decision support systems such as Geographical Information Systems (GIS) makes possible to effectively manage SRP. Besides classical measurements used in VRP, such as total length of routes or time required for delivery in each route, other measurements, mostly qualitative ones, are presented. All of these are named as visual attractiveness. This paper discusses possible relationships between quantitative and qualitative measurements that give a promise for finding better solutions of SRP. Several new types of heuristics for solving SRP are evaluated and afterward compared using the real data. One of the key properties of GIS to use routing software is its flexible interactive and user-friendly environment. Routing software can find a good solution and explore the possibilities while an expert later can change the calculated routes to explore other possibilities based on the expert’s judgment. This paper presents a practical use of new heuristics with the ArcView and solution of address mail for several cities in Slovakia served by Slovak Post ltd. Other Decision Support Systems that solve SRP are presented as TRANSCAD developed by Caliper Corporation or GeoRoute promoted by Canadian Post and GIRO.http://www.transport.vgtu.lt/upload/tif_zur/2008-3-matis.pdfSRPVRPdecision support systemGISheuristicsvisual attractiveness
spellingShingle P. Matis
Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
Transport
SRP
VRP
decision support system
GIS
heuristics
visual attractiveness
title Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
title_full Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
title_fullStr Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
title_full_unstemmed Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
title_short Decision support system for solving the street routing problem
title_sort decision support system for solving the street routing problem
topic SRP
VRP
decision support system
GIS
heuristics
visual attractiveness
url http://www.transport.vgtu.lt/upload/tif_zur/2008-3-matis.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT pmatis decisionsupportsystemforsolvingthestreetroutingproblem