On abduction, dualities and reason
We integrate dualistic conceptions of the real with Peirce's perspectives about reality and abduction, emphasizing the concept of reason underlying Peirce's thoughts. Peirce's abduction is related to the notions of retrogression and grounding in Hegel, later re-encountered in Hansonia...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati
2023-07-01
|
| Series: | Science & Philosophy |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/scienceandphilosophy/article/view/1217 |
| _version_ | 1827906699500978176 |
|---|---|
| author | Hernán Gustavo Solari Mario Alberto Natiello |
| author_facet | Hernán Gustavo Solari Mario Alberto Natiello |
| author_sort | Hernán Gustavo Solari |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We integrate dualistic conceptions of the real with Peirce's perspectives about reality and abduction, emphasizing the concept of reason underlying Peirce's thoughts. Peirce's abduction is related to the notions of retrogression and grounding in Hegel, later re-encountered in Hansonian-abduction.
Abduction in turn is considered in relation to abstraction acquiring its fullest sense as a stage in the process of producing a theory. The process is iterative and self improving, it incorporates ``turbid thinking'' making it increasingly ``clear'' at successive iterations that incorporate the lessons taught by failed predictions, i.e., refutations. The cycle of thoughts promoted by doubts comes to rest when belief is reached. We discuss how this coming to rest depends on a criterion for cessation of doubts. The observation is illustrated with two different criteria, one proposed by Mach that only demands analogy and the criteria of dualists such as Goethe and Whewell that inspire the present work. Hence, it is possible to produce, and socially accept, imperfect theories unless we demand the highest level of rationality, avoiding any leftover of the turbid thoughts that have been used in the early developments. This work rests upon the existence of some objective form of reason. Influenced by a constructivist, Piagetian, perspective of science, we propose and discuss a small number of conditions that we identify as characteristics of rational abduction: rules for the rational construction of theories. We show how a classical example of belief that satisfies
today's most common definition of abduction does not match the standards of rational retroduction. We further show how the same rules indicate the partial detachment of Special Relativity from the observable world, a fact actually known to Einstein. We close arguing that there is an urgent need to develop a critical epistemology incorporating dualistic perspectives. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:00:34Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ebbc83ffea8f4517b553d6d00867360b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2282-7757 2282-7765 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T01:00:34Z |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | Accademia Piceno Aprutina dei Velati |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Science & Philosophy |
| spelling | doaj.art-ebbc83ffea8f4517b553d6d00867360b2023-07-06T12:55:57ZengAccademia Piceno Aprutina dei VelatiScience & Philosophy2282-77572282-77652023-07-01111316910.23756/sp.v11i1.1217814On abduction, dualities and reasonHernán Gustavo Solari0Mario Alberto Natiello1Depto. de Física, FCEN - UBA Buenos Aires and IFIBA-CONICETCentre for Mathematical Sciences Lund University, LundWe integrate dualistic conceptions of the real with Peirce's perspectives about reality and abduction, emphasizing the concept of reason underlying Peirce's thoughts. Peirce's abduction is related to the notions of retrogression and grounding in Hegel, later re-encountered in Hansonian-abduction. Abduction in turn is considered in relation to abstraction acquiring its fullest sense as a stage in the process of producing a theory. The process is iterative and self improving, it incorporates ``turbid thinking'' making it increasingly ``clear'' at successive iterations that incorporate the lessons taught by failed predictions, i.e., refutations. The cycle of thoughts promoted by doubts comes to rest when belief is reached. We discuss how this coming to rest depends on a criterion for cessation of doubts. The observation is illustrated with two different criteria, one proposed by Mach that only demands analogy and the criteria of dualists such as Goethe and Whewell that inspire the present work. Hence, it is possible to produce, and socially accept, imperfect theories unless we demand the highest level of rationality, avoiding any leftover of the turbid thoughts that have been used in the early developments. This work rests upon the existence of some objective form of reason. Influenced by a constructivist, Piagetian, perspective of science, we propose and discuss a small number of conditions that we identify as characteristics of rational abduction: rules for the rational construction of theories. We show how a classical example of belief that satisfies today's most common definition of abduction does not match the standards of rational retroduction. We further show how the same rules indicate the partial detachment of Special Relativity from the observable world, a fact actually known to Einstein. We close arguing that there is an urgent need to develop a critical epistemology incorporating dualistic perspectives.http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/scienceandphilosophy/article/view/1217theory buildingrules of reasoningepistemology |
| spellingShingle | Hernán Gustavo Solari Mario Alberto Natiello On abduction, dualities and reason Science & Philosophy theory building rules of reasoning epistemology |
| title | On abduction, dualities and reason |
| title_full | On abduction, dualities and reason |
| title_fullStr | On abduction, dualities and reason |
| title_full_unstemmed | On abduction, dualities and reason |
| title_short | On abduction, dualities and reason |
| title_sort | on abduction dualities and reason |
| topic | theory building rules of reasoning epistemology |
| url | http://eiris.it/ojs/index.php/scienceandphilosophy/article/view/1217 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hernangustavosolari onabductiondualitiesandreason AT marioalbertonatiello onabductiondualitiesandreason |