What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults

Abstract Background Worldwide observations point to a two-stage theory of disease called Toxicant-Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT): Stage I, Initiation by an acute high-level or repeated lower-level chemical exposures, followed by Stage II, Triggering of multisystem symptoms by previously tolerated,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia S. Miller, Raymond F. Palmer, David Kattari, Shahir Masri, Nicholas A. Ashford, Rodolfo Rincon, Roger B. Perales, Carl Grimes, Dana R. Sundblad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-08-01
Series:Environmental Sciences Europe
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00772-x
_version_ 1797453580766019584
author Claudia S. Miller
Raymond F. Palmer
David Kattari
Shahir Masri
Nicholas A. Ashford
Rodolfo Rincon
Roger B. Perales
Carl Grimes
Dana R. Sundblad
author_facet Claudia S. Miller
Raymond F. Palmer
David Kattari
Shahir Masri
Nicholas A. Ashford
Rodolfo Rincon
Roger B. Perales
Carl Grimes
Dana R. Sundblad
author_sort Claudia S. Miller
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Worldwide observations point to a two-stage theory of disease called Toxicant-Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT): Stage I, Initiation by an acute high-level or repeated lower-level chemical exposures, followed by Stage II, Triggering of multisystem symptoms by previously tolerated, structurally diverse chemical inhalants, foods/food additives and drugs. Until recently, there was no known biological mechanism that could explain these observations. In 2021, we published a plausible and researchable two-stage biomechanism for TILT involving mast cells: Stage I, Initiation via mast cell sensitization; Stage II, Triggering of mast cell degranulation by previously tolerated exposures, resulting in the release of thousands of mediators, including histamine and a host of inflammatory molecules. The objective of this study was to identify common TILT initiators. Methods A randomized, population-based sample of 10,981 U.S. adults responded to a survey which included items concerning medical diagnoses, personal exposures, antibiotic use, and several possible initiators of Chemical Intolerance (CI). CI was assessed using the internationally validated Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). Participants identified as chemically intolerant were asked to recall when their intolerances began and what they felt had initiated their condition. Results Twenty percent met QEESI criteria for TILT, approximately half of whom identified one or more initiating exposures. Initiators in order of frequency were mold (15.6%), pesticides (11.5%), remodeling/new construction (10.7%), medical/surgical procedures (11.3%), fires/combustion products (6.4%), and implants (1.6%). Protracted antibiotic use for infections involving the prostate, skin, tonsils, gastrointestinal tract, and sinuses were strongly associated with TILT/CI (OR > 2). Discussion Participants identified two broad classes of TILT initiators: 1) fossil fuel-derived toxicants (i.e., from coal, oil, natural gas), their combustion products, and/or synthetic organic chemical derivatives, e.g., pesticides, implants, drugs/antibiotics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and 2) biogenic toxicants, e.g., particles and VOCs from mold or algal blooms. One in four primary care patients suffers from Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS). Doctors in primary care, neurology, psychiatry, psychology, occupational medicine, and allergy/immunology would be well-advised to include TILT in their differential diagnosis of patients with so-called MUS. Because 20% of U.S. adults meet QEESI criteria for CI, the role of contemporary exposures in initiating and exacerbating these conditions via mast cells needs our immediate attention. There is a concomitant need for policies and practices that reduce initiating exposures as well as ubiquitous and often unavoidable triggers such as fragranced personal care, cleaning, and laundry products in multi-occupant housing, workplaces, medical settings, schools, places of worship, and all public buildings—literally anywhere air is shared. Fossil fuels are assaulting humans and other animal species both from within via mast cell sensitization, and from without via climate change.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T15:24:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ebd6ad967b3343d98ff76b89b0221f07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2190-4715
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T15:24:52Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Environmental Sciences Europe
spelling doaj.art-ebd6ad967b3343d98ff76b89b0221f072023-11-26T12:36:34ZengSpringerOpenEnvironmental Sciences Europe2190-47152023-08-0135111910.1186/s12302-023-00772-xWhat initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adultsClaudia S. Miller0Raymond F. Palmer1David Kattari2Shahir Masri3Nicholas A. Ashford4Rodolfo Rincon5Roger B. Perales6Carl Grimes7Dana R. Sundblad8University of Texas Health Science CenterUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterHayward ScoreDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, Program in Public Health, University of California- IrvineMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterUniversity of Texas Health Science CenterHayward ScoreHayward ScoreAbstract Background Worldwide observations point to a two-stage theory of disease called Toxicant-Induced Loss of Tolerance (TILT): Stage I, Initiation by an acute high-level or repeated lower-level chemical exposures, followed by Stage II, Triggering of multisystem symptoms by previously tolerated, structurally diverse chemical inhalants, foods/food additives and drugs. Until recently, there was no known biological mechanism that could explain these observations. In 2021, we published a plausible and researchable two-stage biomechanism for TILT involving mast cells: Stage I, Initiation via mast cell sensitization; Stage II, Triggering of mast cell degranulation by previously tolerated exposures, resulting in the release of thousands of mediators, including histamine and a host of inflammatory molecules. The objective of this study was to identify common TILT initiators. Methods A randomized, population-based sample of 10,981 U.S. adults responded to a survey which included items concerning medical diagnoses, personal exposures, antibiotic use, and several possible initiators of Chemical Intolerance (CI). CI was assessed using the internationally validated Quick Environmental Exposure and Sensitivity Inventory (QEESI). Participants identified as chemically intolerant were asked to recall when their intolerances began and what they felt had initiated their condition. Results Twenty percent met QEESI criteria for TILT, approximately half of whom identified one or more initiating exposures. Initiators in order of frequency were mold (15.6%), pesticides (11.5%), remodeling/new construction (10.7%), medical/surgical procedures (11.3%), fires/combustion products (6.4%), and implants (1.6%). Protracted antibiotic use for infections involving the prostate, skin, tonsils, gastrointestinal tract, and sinuses were strongly associated with TILT/CI (OR > 2). Discussion Participants identified two broad classes of TILT initiators: 1) fossil fuel-derived toxicants (i.e., from coal, oil, natural gas), their combustion products, and/or synthetic organic chemical derivatives, e.g., pesticides, implants, drugs/antibiotics, volatile organic compounds (VOCs); and 2) biogenic toxicants, e.g., particles and VOCs from mold or algal blooms. One in four primary care patients suffers from Medically Unexplained Symptoms (MUS). Doctors in primary care, neurology, psychiatry, psychology, occupational medicine, and allergy/immunology would be well-advised to include TILT in their differential diagnosis of patients with so-called MUS. Because 20% of U.S. adults meet QEESI criteria for CI, the role of contemporary exposures in initiating and exacerbating these conditions via mast cells needs our immediate attention. There is a concomitant need for policies and practices that reduce initiating exposures as well as ubiquitous and often unavoidable triggers such as fragranced personal care, cleaning, and laundry products in multi-occupant housing, workplaces, medical settings, schools, places of worship, and all public buildings—literally anywhere air is shared. Fossil fuels are assaulting humans and other animal species both from within via mast cell sensitization, and from without via climate change.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00772-xChemical intolerance (CI)Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance (TILT)Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS)Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI)Pesticides, mold, antibiotics, combustion products, volatile organic compounds (VOCs)Microbiome, prevention, breast implant illness, mast cells, environment, exposures, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS)
spellingShingle Claudia S. Miller
Raymond F. Palmer
David Kattari
Shahir Masri
Nicholas A. Ashford
Rodolfo Rincon
Roger B. Perales
Carl Grimes
Dana R. Sundblad
What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
Environmental Sciences Europe
Chemical intolerance (CI)
Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance (TILT)
Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS)
Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI)
Pesticides, mold, antibiotics, combustion products, volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Microbiome, prevention, breast implant illness, mast cells, environment, exposures, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS)
title What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
title_full What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
title_fullStr What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
title_full_unstemmed What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
title_short What initiates chemical intolerance? Findings from a large population-based survey of U.S. adults
title_sort what initiates chemical intolerance findings from a large population based survey of u s adults
topic Chemical intolerance (CI)
Toxicant-induced loss of tolerance (TILT)
Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS)
Idiopathic environmental intolerance (IEI)
Pesticides, mold, antibiotics, combustion products, volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
Microbiome, prevention, breast implant illness, mast cells, environment, exposures, mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS)
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-023-00772-x
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiasmiller whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT raymondfpalmer whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT davidkattari whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT shahirmasri whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT nicholasaashford whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT rodolforincon whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT rogerbperales whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT carlgrimes whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults
AT danarsundblad whatinitiateschemicalintolerancefindingsfromalargepopulationbasedsurveyofusadults