Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools?
Global population growth, especially in developing countries, will most likely require an increase in agricultural production, but the sustainability of this production cannot be achieved without the preservation of ecosystem functions. Therefore, farmers need to know about, and deal with, the trade...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | Land |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1329 |
| _version_ | 1797588664897765376 |
|---|---|
| author | Josias Sanou Anna Tengberg Hugues Roméo Bazié David Mingasson Madelene Ostwald |
| author_facet | Josias Sanou Anna Tengberg Hugues Roméo Bazié David Mingasson Madelene Ostwald |
| author_sort | Josias Sanou |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Global population growth, especially in developing countries, will most likely require an increase in agricultural production, but the sustainability of this production cannot be achieved without the preservation of ecosystem functions. Therefore, farmers need to know about, and deal with, the trade-offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions and services. This review aims to assess practical science-based tools that can be used to make decisions for sustainable agricultural production. We reviewed 184 articles and divided them into categories depending on whether they describe tools, practices, ecosystem services, models, or other topics. Although many studies were global in scope, the approach to analyzing and assessing trade-offs appears to vary geographically. The review showed that trade-offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions are most commonly studied in Europe and Asia, while few studies have been conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Most tools in the review addressed only one or a bundle of ecosystem services, related to water, biodiversity, or climate regulation, and were designed for different types of land use and ecosystems and applicable at different scales. More practical tools for trade-off analysis have mainly been developed and applied by development organizations with support from science. Closer collaboration between practitioners, development organizations, and scientists is suggested to foster co-development of tools useful for identifying sustainable strategies for closing the yield gap, increasing productivity and for balancing ecosystem services, building on the Sustainable Development Goal’s framework and its targets for agricultural productivity and ecosystem services for trade-off analysis. We recommend the development and fine-tuning of the identified tools to specific contexts and landscapes through innovation platforms bringing together farmers, extension workers, scientists, and local decision-makers. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:55:15Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ebe8c70a1685454a8195e7d34e63df8b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2073-445X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T00:55:15Z |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Land |
| spelling | doaj.art-ebe8c70a1685454a8195e7d34e63df8b2023-11-18T20:05:49ZengMDPI AGLand2073-445X2023-06-01127132910.3390/land12071329Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools?Josias Sanou0Anna Tengberg1Hugues Roméo Bazié2David Mingasson3Madelene Ostwald4Département Environnement et Forêts, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7047, Burkina FasoSwedish Water House, Stockholm International Water Institute, P.O. Box 101 87, 100 55 Stockholm, SwedenLaboratoire Biosciences, Unité de Formation et Recherche en Sciences de la Vie et de la Terre, Université Joseph Ki-Zerbo, Ouagadougou 03 BP 7021, Burkina FasoGothenburg Center for Sustainable Development, P.O. Box 100, 412 96 Gothenburg, SwedenDepartment of Thematic Studies—Environmental Change, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, SwedenGlobal population growth, especially in developing countries, will most likely require an increase in agricultural production, but the sustainability of this production cannot be achieved without the preservation of ecosystem functions. Therefore, farmers need to know about, and deal with, the trade-offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions and services. This review aims to assess practical science-based tools that can be used to make decisions for sustainable agricultural production. We reviewed 184 articles and divided them into categories depending on whether they describe tools, practices, ecosystem services, models, or other topics. Although many studies were global in scope, the approach to analyzing and assessing trade-offs appears to vary geographically. The review showed that trade-offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions are most commonly studied in Europe and Asia, while few studies have been conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Most tools in the review addressed only one or a bundle of ecosystem services, related to water, biodiversity, or climate regulation, and were designed for different types of land use and ecosystems and applicable at different scales. More practical tools for trade-off analysis have mainly been developed and applied by development organizations with support from science. Closer collaboration between practitioners, development organizations, and scientists is suggested to foster co-development of tools useful for identifying sustainable strategies for closing the yield gap, increasing productivity and for balancing ecosystem services, building on the Sustainable Development Goal’s framework and its targets for agricultural productivity and ecosystem services for trade-off analysis. We recommend the development and fine-tuning of the identified tools to specific contexts and landscapes through innovation platforms bringing together farmers, extension workers, scientists, and local decision-makers.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1329agricultureproductivityecosystem functionstrade-offsassessment tools |
| spellingShingle | Josias Sanou Anna Tengberg Hugues Roméo Bazié David Mingasson Madelene Ostwald Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? Land agriculture productivity ecosystem functions trade-offs assessment tools |
| title | Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? |
| title_full | Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? |
| title_fullStr | Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? |
| title_short | Assessing Trade-Offs between Agricultural Productivity and Ecosystem Functions: A Review of Science-Based Tools? |
| title_sort | assessing trade offs between agricultural productivity and ecosystem functions a review of science based tools |
| topic | agriculture productivity ecosystem functions trade-offs assessment tools |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/7/1329 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT josiassanou assessingtradeoffsbetweenagriculturalproductivityandecosystemfunctionsareviewofsciencebasedtools AT annatengberg assessingtradeoffsbetweenagriculturalproductivityandecosystemfunctionsareviewofsciencebasedtools AT huguesromeobazie assessingtradeoffsbetweenagriculturalproductivityandecosystemfunctionsareviewofsciencebasedtools AT davidmingasson assessingtradeoffsbetweenagriculturalproductivityandecosystemfunctionsareviewofsciencebasedtools AT madeleneostwald assessingtradeoffsbetweenagriculturalproductivityandecosystemfunctionsareviewofsciencebasedtools |