Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development

Over the past decade there has been a concerted attempt among a growing group of authors to bring together the political science subfields of urban politics and American political development (APD). In this paper, I look at specifically how the comparative study of different cities and urban areas m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richardson Dilworth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-10-01
Series:Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/10/183
_version_ 1797550968711151616
author Richardson Dilworth
author_facet Richardson Dilworth
author_sort Richardson Dilworth
collection DOAJ
description Over the past decade there has been a concerted attempt among a growing group of authors to bring together the political science subfields of urban politics and American political development (APD). In this paper, I look at specifically how the comparative study of different cities and urban areas might contribute to this intellectual project, beginning with a brief illustrative comparison of Philadelphia and Montreal. I then place that comparison in the larger context of recent literature in postcolonialism, assemblage, and planetary urbanization, which I use to establish what I call an aggregation strategy for constructing variables—or, alternately, for denying the very existence of variables. I then suggest how my aggregation strategy could improve upon urban regime analysis, and inform new directions in studies at the intersection of urban politics and APD.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T15:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ebf0d29fdd804a7aa1c160afd82a89ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0760
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T15:36:57Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ebf0d29fdd804a7aa1c160afd82a89ac2023-11-20T17:09:54ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602020-10-0191018310.3390/socsci9100183Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political DevelopmentRichardson Dilworth0Department of Politics, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19147, USAOver the past decade there has been a concerted attempt among a growing group of authors to bring together the political science subfields of urban politics and American political development (APD). In this paper, I look at specifically how the comparative study of different cities and urban areas might contribute to this intellectual project, beginning with a brief illustrative comparison of Philadelphia and Montreal. I then place that comparison in the larger context of recent literature in postcolonialism, assemblage, and planetary urbanization, which I use to establish what I call an aggregation strategy for constructing variables—or, alternately, for denying the very existence of variables. I then suggest how my aggregation strategy could improve upon urban regime analysis, and inform new directions in studies at the intersection of urban politics and APD.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/10/183urban studiesurban theoryAmerican political developmentPhiladelphiaMontreal
spellingShingle Richardson Dilworth
Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
Social Sciences
urban studies
urban theory
American political development
Philadelphia
Montreal
title Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
title_full Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
title_fullStr Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
title_short Comparative Case Study Methods in Urban Political Development
title_sort comparative case study methods in urban political development
topic urban studies
urban theory
American political development
Philadelphia
Montreal
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/9/10/183
work_keys_str_mv AT richardsondilworth comparativecasestudymethodsinurbanpoliticaldevelopment