Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans

Introduction: A solution for emergency department (ED) congestion remains elusive. As reliance on imaging grows, computed tomography (CT) turnaround time has been identified as a major bottleneck. In this study we sought to identify factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arjun Dhanik, Bryan A. Stenson, Robin B. Levenson, Peter S. Antkowiak, Leon D. Sanchez, David T. Chiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2024-02-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19j7199s
_version_ 1827288468722548736
author Arjun Dhanik
Bryan A. Stenson
Robin B. Levenson
Peter S. Antkowiak
Leon D. Sanchez
David T. Chiu
author_facet Arjun Dhanik
Bryan A. Stenson
Robin B. Levenson
Peter S. Antkowiak
Leon D. Sanchez
David T. Chiu
author_sort Arjun Dhanik
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: A solution for emergency department (ED) congestion remains elusive. As reliance on imaging grows, computed tomography (CT) turnaround time has been identified as a major bottleneck. In this study we sought to identify factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all CT imaging completed at an urban, tertiary care ED from May 1–July 31, 2021. During that period, 5,685 CTs were performed on 4,344 patients, with a median time from CT order to completion of 108 minutes (Quartile 1 [Q1]: 57 minutes, Quartile 3 [Q3]: 182 minutes, interquartile range [IQR]: 125 minutes). Outliers were defined as studies that took longer than 369 minutes to complete (Q3 + 1.5 × IQR). We systematically reviewed outlier charts to determine factors associated with delay and identified five factors: behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; intravenous (IV) line issues; contrast allergies; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) concerns; and delays related to imaging protocol (eg, need for IV contrast, request for oral and/or rectal contrast). We calculated confidence intervals (CI) using the modified Wald method. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a kappa analysis. Results: We identified a total of 182 outliers (4.2% of total patients). Fifteen (8.2%) cases were excluded for CT time-stamp inconsistencies. Of the 167 outliers analyzed, 38 delays (22.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0–29.7) were due to behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; 30 (18.0%, 95% CI 12.8–24.5) were due to IV issues; 24 (14.4%, 95% CI 9.8–20.6) were due to contrast allergies; 21 (12.6%, 95% CI 8.3–18.5) were due to GFR concerns; and 20 (12.0%, 95% CI 7.8–17.9) were related to imaging study protocols. The cause of the delay was unknown in 55 cases (32.9%, 95% CI 26.3–40.4). Conclusion: Our review identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Patient factors such as behavior, allergies, and medical acuity cannot be controlled. However, institutional policies regarding difficult IV access, contrast administration in low GFR settings, and study protocols may be modified, capturing up to 42.6% of outliers.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:32:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec0018d1c63549bdb48700937c9a6c91
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:32:34Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ec0018d1c63549bdb48700937c9a6c912024-04-10T08:57:29ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182024-02-0125222622910.5811/westjem.1783117831Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography ScansArjun Dhanik0Bryan A. Stenson1Robin B. Levenson2Peter S. Antkowiak3Leon D. Sanchez4David T. Chiu5Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MassachusettsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MassachusettsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MassachusettsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MassachusettsHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MassachusettsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, MassachusettsIntroduction: A solution for emergency department (ED) congestion remains elusive. As reliance on imaging grows, computed tomography (CT) turnaround time has been identified as a major bottleneck. In this study we sought to identify factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of all CT imaging completed at an urban, tertiary care ED from May 1–July 31, 2021. During that period, 5,685 CTs were performed on 4,344 patients, with a median time from CT order to completion of 108 minutes (Quartile 1 [Q1]: 57 minutes, Quartile 3 [Q3]: 182 minutes, interquartile range [IQR]: 125 minutes). Outliers were defined as studies that took longer than 369 minutes to complete (Q3 + 1.5 × IQR). We systematically reviewed outlier charts to determine factors associated with delay and identified five factors: behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; intravenous (IV) line issues; contrast allergies; glomerular filtration rate (GFR) concerns; and delays related to imaging protocol (eg, need for IV contrast, request for oral and/or rectal contrast). We calculated confidence intervals (CI) using the modified Wald method. Inter-rater reliability was assessed with a kappa analysis. Results: We identified a total of 182 outliers (4.2% of total patients). Fifteen (8.2%) cases were excluded for CT time-stamp inconsistencies. Of the 167 outliers analyzed, 38 delays (22.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17.0–29.7) were due to behaviorally non-compliant or medically unstable patients; 30 (18.0%, 95% CI 12.8–24.5) were due to IV issues; 24 (14.4%, 95% CI 9.8–20.6) were due to contrast allergies; 21 (12.6%, 95% CI 8.3–18.5) were due to GFR concerns; and 20 (12.0%, 95% CI 7.8–17.9) were related to imaging study protocols. The cause of the delay was unknown in 55 cases (32.9%, 95% CI 26.3–40.4). Conclusion: Our review identified both modifiable and non-modifiable factors associated with significantly delayed CT in the ED. Patient factors such as behavior, allergies, and medical acuity cannot be controlled. However, institutional policies regarding difficult IV access, contrast administration in low GFR settings, and study protocols may be modified, capturing up to 42.6% of outliers.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19j7199s
spellingShingle Arjun Dhanik
Bryan A. Stenson
Robin B. Levenson
Peter S. Antkowiak
Leon D. Sanchez
David T. Chiu
Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
title_full Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
title_fullStr Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
title_full_unstemmed Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
title_short Root Cause Analysis of Delayed Emergency Department Computed Tomography Scans
title_sort root cause analysis of delayed emergency department computed tomography scans
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/19j7199s
work_keys_str_mv AT arjundhanik rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans
AT bryanastenson rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans
AT robinblevenson rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans
AT petersantkowiak rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans
AT leondsanchez rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans
AT davidtchiu rootcauseanalysisofdelayedemergencydepartmentcomputedtomographyscans