OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories
The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts in the field providing comments for a submitted article. The reviewer remains anonymous to the author, with only the editor knowing the reviewer´s identity. This model is now being challenged and open...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Code4Lib
2017-01-01
|
Series: | Code4Lib Journal |
Online Access: | http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12171 |
_version_ | 1818240869779636224 |
---|---|
author | Pandelis Perakakis Agnes Ponsati Isabel Bernal Carles Sierra Nardine Osman Concha Mosquera-de-Arancibia Emilio Lorenzo |
author_facet | Pandelis Perakakis Agnes Ponsati Isabel Bernal Carles Sierra Nardine Osman Concha Mosquera-de-Arancibia Emilio Lorenzo |
author_sort | Pandelis Perakakis |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts in the field providing comments for a submitted article. The reviewer remains anonymous to the author, with only the editor knowing the reviewer´s identity. This model is now being challenged and open peer review (OPR) models are viewed as the new frontier of the review process. OPR is a term that encompasses diverse variations in the traditional review process. Examples of this are modifications in the way in which authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity (open identities), the visibility of the reviews carried out (open reviews) or the opening up of the review to the academic community (open participation). We present the project for the implementation of an Open Peer Review Module in two major Spanish repositories, DIGITAL.CSIC and e-IEO, together with some promising initial results and challenges in the take-up process. The OPR module, designed for integration with DSpace repositories, enables any scholar to provide a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of any research object hosted in these repositories. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:20:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ec17bbe504c94619a31ee669b0c5d752 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1940-5758 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-12T13:20:18Z |
publishDate | 2017-01-01 |
publisher | Code4Lib |
record_format | Article |
series | Code4Lib Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-ec17bbe504c94619a31ee669b0c5d7522022-12-22T00:23:20ZengCode4LibCode4Lib Journal1940-57582017-01-013512171OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access RepositoriesPandelis PerakakisAgnes PonsatiIsabel BernalCarles SierraNardine OsmanConcha Mosquera-de-ArancibiaEmilio LorenzoThe peer review system is the norm for many publications. It involves an editor and several experts in the field providing comments for a submitted article. The reviewer remains anonymous to the author, with only the editor knowing the reviewer´s identity. This model is now being challenged and open peer review (OPR) models are viewed as the new frontier of the review process. OPR is a term that encompasses diverse variations in the traditional review process. Examples of this are modifications in the way in which authors and reviewers are aware of each other’s identity (open identities), the visibility of the reviews carried out (open reviews) or the opening up of the review to the academic community (open participation). We present the project for the implementation of an Open Peer Review Module in two major Spanish repositories, DIGITAL.CSIC and e-IEO, together with some promising initial results and challenges in the take-up process. The OPR module, designed for integration with DSpace repositories, enables any scholar to provide a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of any research object hosted in these repositories.http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12171 |
spellingShingle | Pandelis Perakakis Agnes Ponsati Isabel Bernal Carles Sierra Nardine Osman Concha Mosquera-de-Arancibia Emilio Lorenzo OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories Code4Lib Journal |
title | OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories |
title_full | OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories |
title_fullStr | OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories |
title_full_unstemmed | OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories |
title_short | OPRM: Challenges to Including Open Peer Review in Open Access Repositories |
title_sort | oprm challenges to including open peer review in open access repositories |
url | http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/12171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandelisperakakis oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT agnesponsati oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT isabelbernal oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT carlessierra oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT nardineosman oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT conchamosqueradearancibia oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories AT emiliolorenzo oprmchallengestoincludingopenpeerreviewinopenaccessrepositories |