Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for benzylpiperazine (BZP, <b>1</b>), an illicit designer drug, were developed by using both self-assembly and semi-covalent approaches. From an array of potential functional monomers (FMs) and using a combination of pre-synthetic interaction studies...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen M. Wright, Michael C. Bowyer, Adam McCluskey, Clovia I. Holdsworth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/6/5117
_version_ 1797611415593287680
author Kathleen M. Wright
Michael C. Bowyer
Adam McCluskey
Clovia I. Holdsworth
author_facet Kathleen M. Wright
Michael C. Bowyer
Adam McCluskey
Clovia I. Holdsworth
author_sort Kathleen M. Wright
collection DOAJ
description Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for benzylpiperazine (BZP, <b>1</b>), an illicit designer drug, were developed by using both self-assembly and semi-covalent approaches. From an array of potential functional monomers (FMs) and using a combination of pre-synthetic interaction studies (by molecular modelling and NMR analysis) and binding assays, the highest performing self-assembly <b>1</b>-MIPs were confirmed to result from methacrylic acid (<b>7</b>) as FM, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) or trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TRIM) as crosslinkers and chloroform as the porogen and rebinding solvent at template (T): FM ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, giving imprinting factors (IF) 3 to 7. The semi-covalent <b>1</b>-MIPs were designed using benzylpiperazine (4-vinylphenyl) carbamate (<b>16</b>) as the template–monomer adduct in combination with either EDGMA or TRIM. Our comparative analysis showed the semi-covalent polymers to have a stronger affinity for <b>1</b> (significantly lower K<sub>d</sub> values and higher IFs) and faster uptake than the self-assembly systems. Both approaches have comparable cross-reactivity: marginal to low against cocaine (<b>17</b>) and morphine (<b>18</b>) and high against ephedrine (<b>19</b>) and phenylpiperazine (<b>20</b>). They also have comparable selectivity: highly selective towards <b>1</b> against <b>17</b>, moderate against <b>18</b> and non-selective against <b>19</b>. EGDMA-based self-assembly MIPs displayed a greater imprinting effect (higher IFs and NIP-to-MIP K<sub>d</sub> ratios) than TRIM-based MIPs, while the TRIM-based semi-covalent MIP outperformed its EGDMA-based equivalent. By virtue of its modest selectivity against the test illicit drugs, <b>1</b>-MIPs could potentially be used as a dummy MIP for the broad-based capture and enrichment of illicit drug blends for subsequent laboratory analysis.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T06:27:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec46535bdd2c44409d24bca6cbfbcc45
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1661-6596
1422-0067
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T06:27:34Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series International Journal of Molecular Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ec46535bdd2c44409d24bca6cbfbcc452023-11-17T11:29:22ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences1661-65961422-00672023-03-01246511710.3390/ijms24065117Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent ApproachesKathleen M. Wright0Michael C. Bowyer1Adam McCluskey2Clovia I. Holdsworth3Sanitarium Health Food Company, 1 Sanitarium Drive, Berkeley Vale, NSW 2261, AustraliaAcademic Division, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, NSW 2258, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, AustraliaMolecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) for benzylpiperazine (BZP, <b>1</b>), an illicit designer drug, were developed by using both self-assembly and semi-covalent approaches. From an array of potential functional monomers (FMs) and using a combination of pre-synthetic interaction studies (by molecular modelling and NMR analysis) and binding assays, the highest performing self-assembly <b>1</b>-MIPs were confirmed to result from methacrylic acid (<b>7</b>) as FM, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) or trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate (TRIM) as crosslinkers and chloroform as the porogen and rebinding solvent at template (T): FM ratios of 1:1 and 1:2, giving imprinting factors (IF) 3 to 7. The semi-covalent <b>1</b>-MIPs were designed using benzylpiperazine (4-vinylphenyl) carbamate (<b>16</b>) as the template–monomer adduct in combination with either EDGMA or TRIM. Our comparative analysis showed the semi-covalent polymers to have a stronger affinity for <b>1</b> (significantly lower K<sub>d</sub> values and higher IFs) and faster uptake than the self-assembly systems. Both approaches have comparable cross-reactivity: marginal to low against cocaine (<b>17</b>) and morphine (<b>18</b>) and high against ephedrine (<b>19</b>) and phenylpiperazine (<b>20</b>). They also have comparable selectivity: highly selective towards <b>1</b> against <b>17</b>, moderate against <b>18</b> and non-selective against <b>19</b>. EGDMA-based self-assembly MIPs displayed a greater imprinting effect (higher IFs and NIP-to-MIP K<sub>d</sub> ratios) than TRIM-based MIPs, while the TRIM-based semi-covalent MIP outperformed its EGDMA-based equivalent. By virtue of its modest selectivity against the test illicit drugs, <b>1</b>-MIPs could potentially be used as a dummy MIP for the broad-based capture and enrichment of illicit drug blends for subsequent laboratory analysis.https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/6/5117molecular imprintingmolecularly imprinted polymersMIPself-assembly MIPsemi-covalent MIPbenzylpiperazine
spellingShingle Kathleen M. Wright
Michael C. Bowyer
Adam McCluskey
Clovia I. Holdsworth
Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
molecular imprinting
molecularly imprinted polymers
MIP
self-assembly MIP
semi-covalent MIP
benzylpiperazine
title Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
title_full Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
title_fullStr Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
title_short Molecular Imprinting of Benzylpiperazine: A Comparison of the Self-Assembly and Semi-Covalent Approaches
title_sort molecular imprinting of benzylpiperazine a comparison of the self assembly and semi covalent approaches
topic molecular imprinting
molecularly imprinted polymers
MIP
self-assembly MIP
semi-covalent MIP
benzylpiperazine
url https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/6/5117
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleenmwright molecularimprintingofbenzylpiperazineacomparisonoftheselfassemblyandsemicovalentapproaches
AT michaelcbowyer molecularimprintingofbenzylpiperazineacomparisonoftheselfassemblyandsemicovalentapproaches
AT adammccluskey molecularimprintingofbenzylpiperazineacomparisonoftheselfassemblyandsemicovalentapproaches
AT cloviaiholdsworth molecularimprintingofbenzylpiperazineacomparisonoftheselfassemblyandsemicovalentapproaches