The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos

Abstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haijing Zhao, Keer Gan, Xiaohui Ji, Lingyan Zheng, Songbang Ou, Mei Mei, Qingxue Zhang, Hui Chen, Ping Yuan, Wenjun Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-02-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-x
_version_ 1797273632689356800
author Haijing Zhao
Keer Gan
Xiaohui Ji
Lingyan Zheng
Songbang Ou
Mei Mei
Qingxue Zhang
Hui Chen
Ping Yuan
Wenjun Wang
author_facet Haijing Zhao
Keer Gan
Xiaohui Ji
Lingyan Zheng
Songbang Ou
Mei Mei
Qingxue Zhang
Hui Chen
Ping Yuan
Wenjun Wang
author_sort Haijing Zhao
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect blastocyst formation, blastocyst quality, and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos from 2987 couples between January 2017 to June 2021, namely 1520 embryos categorized as “812” (8-cell, grade 2, mild fragmentation), 2961 as “821” (8-cell, grade 2, mild asymmetry), 896 as “711” (7-cell, grade 1), and 517 as “911” (9-cell, grade 1) compared with 3714 embryos categorized as “811” (8-cell, grade 1). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Blastulation rate (BR), available late blastocyst rate (ABR) and high-quality late blastocyst rate (HBR) were secondary outcome measures. Results BR, ABR, and HBR had significant differences among the five groups (P < 0.001), while CPR and LBR were also significantly different in cleavage-stage fresh transfer (P < 0.01). The multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between cell number, cell size, blastocyst development and clinical outcomes. For 7 to 9-cell highest-quality embryo, mild fragmentation and more blastomeres were more conducive to blastocyst formation and clinical outcomes. While cleavage-stage embryos developed into blastocysts, the negative impact of their initial morphology on clinical outcomes would be erased. Conclusions Our study firstly evaluated blastocyst development and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles, with rankings of 811, 812, 911, 821, and 711. We found the initial morphological characteristics of the high-quality cleavage-stage embryos did not adversely impact clinical outcomes, even as they progressed to the blastocyst stage.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:47:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec4b8e6c320e4239a3ddcadc43a54522
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-2215
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:47:11Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Ovarian Research
spelling doaj.art-ec4b8e6c320e4239a3ddcadc43a545222024-03-05T19:58:01ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152024-02-0117111110.1186/s13048-024-01371-xThe impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryosHaijing Zhao0Keer Gan1Xiaohui Ji2Lingyan Zheng3Songbang Ou4Mei Mei5Qingxue Zhang6Hui Chen7Ping Yuan8Wenjun Wang9IVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityAbstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect blastocyst formation, blastocyst quality, and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos from 2987 couples between January 2017 to June 2021, namely 1520 embryos categorized as “812” (8-cell, grade 2, mild fragmentation), 2961 as “821” (8-cell, grade 2, mild asymmetry), 896 as “711” (7-cell, grade 1), and 517 as “911” (9-cell, grade 1) compared with 3714 embryos categorized as “811” (8-cell, grade 1). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Blastulation rate (BR), available late blastocyst rate (ABR) and high-quality late blastocyst rate (HBR) were secondary outcome measures. Results BR, ABR, and HBR had significant differences among the five groups (P < 0.001), while CPR and LBR were also significantly different in cleavage-stage fresh transfer (P < 0.01). The multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between cell number, cell size, blastocyst development and clinical outcomes. For 7 to 9-cell highest-quality embryo, mild fragmentation and more blastomeres were more conducive to blastocyst formation and clinical outcomes. While cleavage-stage embryos developed into blastocysts, the negative impact of their initial morphology on clinical outcomes would be erased. Conclusions Our study firstly evaluated blastocyst development and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles, with rankings of 811, 812, 911, 821, and 711. We found the initial morphological characteristics of the high-quality cleavage-stage embryos did not adversely impact clinical outcomes, even as they progressed to the blastocyst stage.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-xHigh-quality embryoBlastocystClinical pregnancy rateLive birth rate
spellingShingle Haijing Zhao
Keer Gan
Xiaohui Ji
Lingyan Zheng
Songbang Ou
Mei Mei
Qingxue Zhang
Hui Chen
Ping Yuan
Wenjun Wang
The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
Journal of Ovarian Research
High-quality embryo
Blastocyst
Clinical pregnancy rate
Live birth rate
title The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
title_full The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
title_fullStr The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
title_full_unstemmed The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
title_short The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
title_sort impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles a retrospective study of 9608 high quality cleavage stage embryos
topic High-quality embryo
Blastocyst
Clinical pregnancy rate
Live birth rate
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-x
work_keys_str_mv AT haijingzhao theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT keergan theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT xiaohuiji theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT lingyanzheng theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT songbangou theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT meimei theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT qingxuezhang theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT huichen theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT pingyuan theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT wenjunwang theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT haijingzhao impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT keergan impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT xiaohuiji impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT lingyanzheng impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT songbangou impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT meimei impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT qingxuezhang impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT huichen impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT pingyuan impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos
AT wenjunwang impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos