The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos
Abstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2024-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ovarian Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-x |
_version_ | 1797273632689356800 |
---|---|
author | Haijing Zhao Keer Gan Xiaohui Ji Lingyan Zheng Songbang Ou Mei Mei Qingxue Zhang Hui Chen Ping Yuan Wenjun Wang |
author_facet | Haijing Zhao Keer Gan Xiaohui Ji Lingyan Zheng Songbang Ou Mei Mei Qingxue Zhang Hui Chen Ping Yuan Wenjun Wang |
author_sort | Haijing Zhao |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect blastocyst formation, blastocyst quality, and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos from 2987 couples between January 2017 to June 2021, namely 1520 embryos categorized as “812” (8-cell, grade 2, mild fragmentation), 2961 as “821” (8-cell, grade 2, mild asymmetry), 896 as “711” (7-cell, grade 1), and 517 as “911” (9-cell, grade 1) compared with 3714 embryos categorized as “811” (8-cell, grade 1). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Blastulation rate (BR), available late blastocyst rate (ABR) and high-quality late blastocyst rate (HBR) were secondary outcome measures. Results BR, ABR, and HBR had significant differences among the five groups (P < 0.001), while CPR and LBR were also significantly different in cleavage-stage fresh transfer (P < 0.01). The multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between cell number, cell size, blastocyst development and clinical outcomes. For 7 to 9-cell highest-quality embryo, mild fragmentation and more blastomeres were more conducive to blastocyst formation and clinical outcomes. While cleavage-stage embryos developed into blastocysts, the negative impact of their initial morphology on clinical outcomes would be erased. Conclusions Our study firstly evaluated blastocyst development and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles, with rankings of 811, 812, 911, 821, and 711. We found the initial morphological characteristics of the high-quality cleavage-stage embryos did not adversely impact clinical outcomes, even as they progressed to the blastocyst stage. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:47:11Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ec4b8e6c320e4239a3ddcadc43a54522 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1757-2215 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:47:11Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Ovarian Research |
spelling | doaj.art-ec4b8e6c320e4239a3ddcadc43a545222024-03-05T19:58:01ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152024-02-0117111110.1186/s13048-024-01371-xThe impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryosHaijing Zhao0Keer Gan1Xiaohui Ji2Lingyan Zheng3Songbang Ou4Mei Mei5Qingxue Zhang6Hui Chen7Ping Yuan8Wenjun Wang9IVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityIVF Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityAbstract Background Evidence from the Istanbul consensus workshop suggests correlations between morphological parameters and embryo developments. 8-cell embryos are the best blastomere stage on day 3. No good quality evidence exists to support high-quality embryonic selection following blastulation and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect blastocyst formation, blastocyst quality, and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles. Methods This study was a retrospective analysis of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos from 2987 couples between January 2017 to June 2021, namely 1520 embryos categorized as “812” (8-cell, grade 2, mild fragmentation), 2961 as “821” (8-cell, grade 2, mild asymmetry), 896 as “711” (7-cell, grade 1), and 517 as “911” (9-cell, grade 1) compared with 3714 embryos categorized as “811” (8-cell, grade 1). The primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR). Blastulation rate (BR), available late blastocyst rate (ABR) and high-quality late blastocyst rate (HBR) were secondary outcome measures. Results BR, ABR, and HBR had significant differences among the five groups (P < 0.001), while CPR and LBR were also significantly different in cleavage-stage fresh transfer (P < 0.01). The multivariable multilevel logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between cell number, cell size, blastocyst development and clinical outcomes. For 7 to 9-cell highest-quality embryo, mild fragmentation and more blastomeres were more conducive to blastocyst formation and clinical outcomes. While cleavage-stage embryos developed into blastocysts, the negative impact of their initial morphology on clinical outcomes would be erased. Conclusions Our study firstly evaluated blastocyst development and clinical outcomes of high-quality cleavage-stage embryos in fresh cycles, with rankings of 811, 812, 911, 821, and 711. We found the initial morphological characteristics of the high-quality cleavage-stage embryos did not adversely impact clinical outcomes, even as they progressed to the blastocyst stage.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-xHigh-quality embryoBlastocystClinical pregnancy rateLive birth rate |
spellingShingle | Haijing Zhao Keer Gan Xiaohui Ji Lingyan Zheng Songbang Ou Mei Mei Qingxue Zhang Hui Chen Ping Yuan Wenjun Wang The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos Journal of Ovarian Research High-quality embryo Blastocyst Clinical pregnancy rate Live birth rate |
title | The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos |
title_full | The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos |
title_fullStr | The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos |
title_short | The impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles: a retrospective study of 9608 high-quality cleavage-stage embryos |
title_sort | impact of clinical and laboratory parameters on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in fresh cycles a retrospective study of 9608 high quality cleavage stage embryos |
topic | High-quality embryo Blastocyst Clinical pregnancy rate Live birth rate |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01371-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haijingzhao theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT keergan theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT xiaohuiji theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT lingyanzheng theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT songbangou theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT meimei theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT qingxuezhang theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT huichen theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT pingyuan theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT wenjunwang theimpactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT haijingzhao impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT keergan impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT xiaohuiji impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT lingyanzheng impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT songbangou impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT meimei impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT qingxuezhang impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT huichen impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT pingyuan impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos AT wenjunwang impactofclinicalandlaboratoryparametersonclinicalpregnancyandlivebirthratesinfreshcyclesaretrospectivestudyof9608highqualitycleavagestageembryos |