Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.

<h4>Background</h4>Understanding the false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is pivotal for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and it has implications for patient management. Our aim was to determine the real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.<h4>Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elisa Kortela, Vesa Kirjavainen, Maarit J Ahava, Suvi T Jokiranta, Anna But, Anna Lindahl, Anu E Jääskeläinen, Annemarjut J Jääskeläinen, Asko Järvinen, Pia Jokela, Hannimari Kallio-Kokko, Raisa Loginov, Laura Mannonen, Eeva Ruotsalainen, Tarja Sironen, Olli Vapalahti, Maija Lappalainen, Hanna-Riikka Kreivi, Hanna Jarva, Satu Kurkela, Eliisa Kekäläinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251661
_version_ 1818899739711635456
author Elisa Kortela
Vesa Kirjavainen
Maarit J Ahava
Suvi T Jokiranta
Anna But
Anna Lindahl
Anu E Jääskeläinen
Annemarjut J Jääskeläinen
Asko Järvinen
Pia Jokela
Hannimari Kallio-Kokko
Raisa Loginov
Laura Mannonen
Eeva Ruotsalainen
Tarja Sironen
Olli Vapalahti
Maija Lappalainen
Hanna-Riikka Kreivi
Hanna Jarva
Satu Kurkela
Eliisa Kekäläinen
author_facet Elisa Kortela
Vesa Kirjavainen
Maarit J Ahava
Suvi T Jokiranta
Anna But
Anna Lindahl
Anu E Jääskeläinen
Annemarjut J Jääskeläinen
Asko Järvinen
Pia Jokela
Hannimari Kallio-Kokko
Raisa Loginov
Laura Mannonen
Eeva Ruotsalainen
Tarja Sironen
Olli Vapalahti
Maija Lappalainen
Hanna-Riikka Kreivi
Hanna Jarva
Satu Kurkela
Eliisa Kekäläinen
author_sort Elisa Kortela
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Understanding the false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is pivotal for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and it has implications for patient management. Our aim was to determine the real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.<h4>Methods</h4>This population-based retrospective study was conducted in March-April 2020 in the Helsinki Capital Region, Finland. Adults who were clinically suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection and underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, with sufficient data in their medical records for grading of clinical suspicion were eligible. In addition to examining the first RT-PCR test of repeat-tested individuals, we also used high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 as the reference standard for calculating the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>All 1,194 inpatients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [18.3] years; 45.2% women) admitted to COVID-19 cohort wards during the study period were included. The outpatient cohort of 1,814 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [17.2] years; 69.1% women) was sampled from epidemiological line lists by systematic quasi-random sampling. The sensitivity (95% CI) for laboratory confirmed cases (repeat-tested patients) was 85.7% (81.5-89.1%) inpatients; 95.5% (92.2-97.5%) outpatients, 89.9% (88.2-92.1%) all. When also patients that were graded as high suspicion but never tested positive were included in the denominator, the sensitivity (95% CI) was: 67.5% (62.9-71.9%) inpatients; 34.9% (31.4-38.5%) outpatients; 47.3% (44.4-50.3%) all.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was only moderate at best. The relatively high false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing need to be accounted for in clinical decision making, epidemiological interpretations, and when using RT-PCR as a reference for other tests.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:52:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec5a0708349a4766a25940e2043eed5a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:52:45Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ec5a0708349a4766a25940e2043eed5a2022-12-21T20:07:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025166110.1371/journal.pone.0251661Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.Elisa KortelaVesa KirjavainenMaarit J AhavaSuvi T JokirantaAnna ButAnna LindahlAnu E JääskeläinenAnnemarjut J JääskeläinenAsko JärvinenPia JokelaHannimari Kallio-KokkoRaisa LoginovLaura MannonenEeva RuotsalainenTarja SironenOlli VapalahtiMaija LappalainenHanna-Riikka KreiviHanna JarvaSatu KurkelaEliisa Kekäläinen<h4>Background</h4>Understanding the false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is pivotal for the management of the COVID-19 pandemic and it has implications for patient management. Our aim was to determine the real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.<h4>Methods</h4>This population-based retrospective study was conducted in March-April 2020 in the Helsinki Capital Region, Finland. Adults who were clinically suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection and underwent SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing, with sufficient data in their medical records for grading of clinical suspicion were eligible. In addition to examining the first RT-PCR test of repeat-tested individuals, we also used high clinical suspicion for COVID-19 as the reference standard for calculating the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>All 1,194 inpatients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [18.3] years; 45.2% women) admitted to COVID-19 cohort wards during the study period were included. The outpatient cohort of 1,814 individuals (mean [SD] age, 45.4 [17.2] years; 69.1% women) was sampled from epidemiological line lists by systematic quasi-random sampling. The sensitivity (95% CI) for laboratory confirmed cases (repeat-tested patients) was 85.7% (81.5-89.1%) inpatients; 95.5% (92.2-97.5%) outpatients, 89.9% (88.2-92.1%) all. When also patients that were graded as high suspicion but never tested positive were included in the denominator, the sensitivity (95% CI) was: 67.5% (62.9-71.9%) inpatients; 34.9% (31.4-38.5%) outpatients; 47.3% (44.4-50.3%) all.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing was only moderate at best. The relatively high false negative rates of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing need to be accounted for in clinical decision making, epidemiological interpretations, and when using RT-PCR as a reference for other tests.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251661
spellingShingle Elisa Kortela
Vesa Kirjavainen
Maarit J Ahava
Suvi T Jokiranta
Anna But
Anna Lindahl
Anu E Jääskeläinen
Annemarjut J Jääskeläinen
Asko Järvinen
Pia Jokela
Hannimari Kallio-Kokko
Raisa Loginov
Laura Mannonen
Eeva Ruotsalainen
Tarja Sironen
Olli Vapalahti
Maija Lappalainen
Hanna-Riikka Kreivi
Hanna Jarva
Satu Kurkela
Eliisa Kekäläinen
Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
PLoS ONE
title Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
title_full Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
title_fullStr Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
title_full_unstemmed Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
title_short Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients.
title_sort real life clinical sensitivity of sars cov 2 rt pcr test in symptomatic patients
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251661
work_keys_str_mv AT elisakortela reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT vesakirjavainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT maaritjahava reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT suvitjokiranta reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT annabut reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT annalindahl reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT anuejaaskelainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT annemarjutjjaaskelainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT askojarvinen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT piajokela reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT hannimarikalliokokko reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT raisaloginov reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT lauramannonen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT eevaruotsalainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT tarjasironen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT ollivapalahti reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT maijalappalainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT hannariikkakreivi reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT hannajarva reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT satukurkela reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients
AT eliisakekalainen reallifeclinicalsensitivityofsarscov2rtpcrtestinsymptomaticpatients