Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
Objective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the Uni...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
2006-08-01
|
Series: | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdf |
_version_ | 1828398519094870016 |
---|---|
author | Sofia Takeda UEMURA Carolina Cardoso GUEDES Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES Manoela Domingues MARTINS Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI |
author_facet | Sofia Takeda UEMURA Carolina Cardoso GUEDES Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES Manoela Domingues MARTINS Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI |
author_sort | Sofia Takeda UEMURA |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Sao Paulo. All teeth were cut in the mesion-distal direction and included in light-cured acrylic resin with its vestibular, palatal and lingual faces directed toward the external surface. The teeth had its vestibular and lingual faces worn till the areas were all flat and randomly divided into four groups. G1: Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk); G2: Optbond Solo (Kerr); G3: Excite (Vivadent) and G4: Single Bond (3M). The adhesive systems were applied according to the manufactures instructions. The same restorative material (Filtek Z-250 3M) was used in all groups. The samples were conserved in distilled during 24h and then submerged in traction assay. Results: Groups 2 and 3 brings the lowest notes and groups 1 and 4 the highest notes. Conclusion: In the conditions of this study the adhesive system Single Bond (3M) and Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk) presented better bond strength resistance to the deciduous teeth dentine. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T09:02:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ec5d1147e5d64a0d9cdcc31e97622216 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1519-0501 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T09:02:31Z |
publishDate | 2006-08-01 |
publisher | Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) |
record_format | Article |
series | Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada |
spelling | doaj.art-ec5d1147e5d64a0d9cdcc31e976222162022-12-22T01:55:14ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05012006-08-0162137141Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous TeethSofia Takeda UEMURACarolina Cardoso GUEDESKristianne Porta S. FERNANDESManoela Domingues MARTINSSandra Kalil BUSSADORIObjective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Sao Paulo. All teeth were cut in the mesion-distal direction and included in light-cured acrylic resin with its vestibular, palatal and lingual faces directed toward the external surface. The teeth had its vestibular and lingual faces worn till the areas were all flat and randomly divided into four groups. G1: Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk); G2: Optbond Solo (Kerr); G3: Excite (Vivadent) and G4: Single Bond (3M). The adhesive systems were applied according to the manufactures instructions. The same restorative material (Filtek Z-250 3M) was used in all groups. The samples were conserved in distilled during 24h and then submerged in traction assay. Results: Groups 2 and 3 brings the lowest notes and groups 1 and 4 the highest notes. Conclusion: In the conditions of this study the adhesive system Single Bond (3M) and Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk) presented better bond strength resistance to the deciduous teeth dentine.http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdfDentin adhesiveBond strengthDeciduous tooth |
spellingShingle | Sofia Takeda UEMURA Carolina Cardoso GUEDES Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES Manoela Domingues MARTINS Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada Dentin adhesive Bond strength Deciduous tooth |
title | Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth |
title_full | Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth |
title_short | Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth |
title_sort | evaluation of the bond strength on one bottle adhesive to deciduous teeth |
topic | Dentin adhesive Bond strength Deciduous tooth |
url | http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sofiatakedauemura evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth AT carolinacardosoguedes evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth AT kristianneportasfernandes evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth AT manoeladominguesmartins evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth AT sandrakalilbussadori evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth |