Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth

Objective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the Uni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sofia Takeda UEMURA, Carolina Cardoso GUEDES, Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES, Manoela Domingues MARTINS, Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB) 2006-08-01
Series:Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdf
_version_ 1828398519094870016
author Sofia Takeda UEMURA
Carolina Cardoso GUEDES
Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES
Manoela Domingues MARTINS
Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI
author_facet Sofia Takeda UEMURA
Carolina Cardoso GUEDES
Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES
Manoela Domingues MARTINS
Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI
author_sort Sofia Takeda UEMURA
collection DOAJ
description Objective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Sao Paulo. All teeth were cut in the mesion-distal direction and included in light-cured acrylic resin with its vestibular, palatal and lingual faces directed toward the external surface. The teeth had its vestibular and lingual faces worn till the areas were all flat and randomly divided into four groups. G1: Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk); G2: Optbond Solo (Kerr); G3: Excite (Vivadent) and G4: Single Bond (3M). The adhesive systems were applied according to the manufactures instructions. The same restorative material (Filtek Z-250 3M) was used in all groups. The samples were conserved in distilled during 24h and then submerged in traction assay. Results: Groups 2 and 3 brings the lowest notes and groups 1 and 4 the highest notes. Conclusion: In the conditions of this study the adhesive system Single Bond (3M) and Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk) presented better bond strength resistance to the deciduous teeth dentine.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:02:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec5d1147e5d64a0d9cdcc31e97622216
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1519-0501
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:02:31Z
publishDate 2006-08-01
publisher Association of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)
record_format Article
series Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
spelling doaj.art-ec5d1147e5d64a0d9cdcc31e976222162022-12-22T01:55:14ZengAssociation of Support to Oral Health Research (APESB)Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada1519-05012006-08-0162137141Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous TeethSofia Takeda UEMURACarolina Cardoso GUEDESKristianne Porta S. FERNANDESManoela Domingues MARTINSSandra Kalil BUSSADORIObjective:This study was carried out with the purpose to evaluate through traction test the bond strength of four one bottle adhesive systems to decidous teeth dentine. Method: For this experiment twenty temporary molar teeth were used from the Human Teeth Bank in the Faculty of Dentistry at the University of Sao Paulo. All teeth were cut in the mesion-distal direction and included in light-cured acrylic resin with its vestibular, palatal and lingual faces directed toward the external surface. The teeth had its vestibular and lingual faces worn till the areas were all flat and randomly divided into four groups. G1: Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk); G2: Optbond Solo (Kerr); G3: Excite (Vivadent) and G4: Single Bond (3M). The adhesive systems were applied according to the manufactures instructions. The same restorative material (Filtek Z-250 3M) was used in all groups. The samples were conserved in distilled during 24h and then submerged in traction assay. Results: Groups 2 and 3 brings the lowest notes and groups 1 and 4 the highest notes. Conclusion: In the conditions of this study the adhesive system Single Bond (3M) and Prime & Bond NT (Dentsply Caulk) presented better bond strength resistance to the deciduous teeth dentine.http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdfDentin adhesiveBond strengthDeciduous tooth
spellingShingle Sofia Takeda UEMURA
Carolina Cardoso GUEDES
Kristianne Porta S. FERNANDES
Manoela Domingues MARTINS
Sandra Kalil BUSSADORI
Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
Pesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada
Dentin adhesive
Bond strength
Deciduous tooth
title Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
title_full Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
title_short Evaluation of the Bond Strength on One Bottle Adhesive to Deciduous Teeth
title_sort evaluation of the bond strength on one bottle adhesive to deciduous teeth
topic Dentin adhesive
Bond strength
Deciduous tooth
url http://www.uepb.edu.br/eduep/pboci/pdf/Artigo5v62.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sofiatakedauemura evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth
AT carolinacardosoguedes evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth
AT kristianneportasfernandes evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth
AT manoeladominguesmartins evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth
AT sandrakalilbussadori evaluationofthebondstrengthononebottleadhesivetodeciduousteeth