Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis
BackgroundDigital technology and media use is integral to adolescents’ lives and has been associated with both positive and negative health consequences. Previous studies have largely focused on understanding technology behaviors and outcomes within adolescent populations, wh...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-05-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting |
| Online Access: | https://pediatrics.jmir.org/2022/2/e35540 |
| _version_ | 1797735093115027456 |
|---|---|
| author | Megan A Moreno Kole Binger Qianqian Zhao Jens Eickhoff Matt Minich Yalda Tehranian Uhls |
| author_facet | Megan A Moreno Kole Binger Qianqian Zhao Jens Eickhoff Matt Minich Yalda Tehranian Uhls |
| author_sort | Megan A Moreno |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundDigital technology and media use is integral to adolescents’ lives and has been associated with both positive and negative health consequences. Previous studies have largely focused on understanding technology behaviors and outcomes within adolescent populations, which can promote assumptions about adolescent technology use as homogeneous. Furthermore, many studies on adolescent technology use have focused on risks and negative outcomes. To better understand adolescent digital technology use, we need new approaches that can assess distinct profiles within study populations and take a balanced approach to understanding the risks and benefits of digital technology use.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify profiles of adolescent technology use within a large study population focusing on four evidence-based constructs: technology ownership and use, parental involvement, health outcomes, and well-being indicators.
MethodsAdolescent-parent dyads were recruited for a cross-sectional web-based survey using the Qualtrics (Qualtrics International, Inc) platform and panels. Technology use measures included ownership of devices, social media use frequency, and the Adolescents’ Digital Technology Interactions and Importance scale. Parent involvement measures included household media rules, technology-related parenting practices, parent social media use frequency, and the parent-child relationship. Health outcome measures included physical activity, sleep, problematic internet use, and mental health assessments. Well-being indicators included mental wellness, communication, and empathy. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct profile groups across the aforementioned 4 critical constructs.
ResultsAmong the 3981 adolescent-parent dyads recruited, adolescent participants had a mean age of 15.0 (SD 1.43) years; a total of 46.3% (1842/3981) were female, 67.8% (2701/3981) were White, and 75% (2986/3981) lived in a household with an income above the poverty line. The LCA identified 2 discrete classes. Class 1 was made up of 62.8% (2501/3981) of the participants. Class 1 participants were more likely than Class 2 participants to report family-owned devices, have lower technology importance scores, have household technology rules often centered on content, have positive parent relationships and lower parent social media use, and report better health outcomes and well-being indicators.
ConclusionsFindings from this national cross-sectional survey using LCA led to 2 distinct profile groups of adolescent media use and their association with technology use and parent involvement as well as health and well-being outcomes. The two classes included a larger Class 1 (Family-Engaged Adolescents) and a smaller Class 2 (At-Risk Adolescents). The findings of this study can inform interventions to reinforce positive technology use and family support. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:54:03Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ec62d0618a0e4ed89a34ead61c051e75 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2561-6722 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:54:03Z |
| publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting |
| spelling | doaj.art-ec62d0618a0e4ed89a34ead61c051e752023-08-28T21:42:52ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Pediatrics and Parenting2561-67222022-05-0152e3554010.2196/35540Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class AnalysisMegan A Morenohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2767-0787Kole Bingerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7644-5709Qianqian Zhaohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-5244Jens Eickhoffhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0525-6462Matt Minichhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8328-412XYalda Tehranian Uhlshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-5541 BackgroundDigital technology and media use is integral to adolescents’ lives and has been associated with both positive and negative health consequences. Previous studies have largely focused on understanding technology behaviors and outcomes within adolescent populations, which can promote assumptions about adolescent technology use as homogeneous. Furthermore, many studies on adolescent technology use have focused on risks and negative outcomes. To better understand adolescent digital technology use, we need new approaches that can assess distinct profiles within study populations and take a balanced approach to understanding the risks and benefits of digital technology use. ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify profiles of adolescent technology use within a large study population focusing on four evidence-based constructs: technology ownership and use, parental involvement, health outcomes, and well-being indicators. MethodsAdolescent-parent dyads were recruited for a cross-sectional web-based survey using the Qualtrics (Qualtrics International, Inc) platform and panels. Technology use measures included ownership of devices, social media use frequency, and the Adolescents’ Digital Technology Interactions and Importance scale. Parent involvement measures included household media rules, technology-related parenting practices, parent social media use frequency, and the parent-child relationship. Health outcome measures included physical activity, sleep, problematic internet use, and mental health assessments. Well-being indicators included mental wellness, communication, and empathy. We used latent class analysis (LCA) to identify distinct profile groups across the aforementioned 4 critical constructs. ResultsAmong the 3981 adolescent-parent dyads recruited, adolescent participants had a mean age of 15.0 (SD 1.43) years; a total of 46.3% (1842/3981) were female, 67.8% (2701/3981) were White, and 75% (2986/3981) lived in a household with an income above the poverty line. The LCA identified 2 discrete classes. Class 1 was made up of 62.8% (2501/3981) of the participants. Class 1 participants were more likely than Class 2 participants to report family-owned devices, have lower technology importance scores, have household technology rules often centered on content, have positive parent relationships and lower parent social media use, and report better health outcomes and well-being indicators. ConclusionsFindings from this national cross-sectional survey using LCA led to 2 distinct profile groups of adolescent media use and their association with technology use and parent involvement as well as health and well-being outcomes. The two classes included a larger Class 1 (Family-Engaged Adolescents) and a smaller Class 2 (At-Risk Adolescents). The findings of this study can inform interventions to reinforce positive technology use and family support.https://pediatrics.jmir.org/2022/2/e35540 |
| spellingShingle | Megan A Moreno Kole Binger Qianqian Zhao Jens Eickhoff Matt Minich Yalda Tehranian Uhls Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting |
| title | Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis |
| title_full | Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis |
| title_fullStr | Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis |
| title_short | Digital Technology and Media Use by Adolescents: Latent Class Analysis |
| title_sort | digital technology and media use by adolescents latent class analysis |
| url | https://pediatrics.jmir.org/2022/2/e35540 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT meganamoreno digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis AT kolebinger digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis AT qianqianzhao digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis AT jenseickhoff digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis AT mattminich digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis AT yaldatehranianuhls digitaltechnologyandmediausebyadolescentslatentclassanalysis |