Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property

The purpose of the study is to determine the scope of application of the construction of abuse of subjective rights in cases involving the establishment of a regime of separate property by the court and the determination of unequal shares in the common property. The prerequisite for both the establi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Agnieszka Szczekala
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University 2020-12-01
Series:Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/9945
_version_ 1818293863887929344
author Agnieszka Szczekala
author_facet Agnieszka Szczekala
author_sort Agnieszka Szczekala
collection DOAJ
description The purpose of the study is to determine the scope of application of the construction of abuse of subjective rights in cases involving the establishment of a regime of separate property by the court and the determination of unequal shares in the common property. The prerequisite for both the establishment of the regime of separate property and the determination of unequal shares in the common property are “important reasons”. In order to determine the admissibility of the application of Article 5 of the Polish Civil Code it is therefore necessary to define the meaning of the terms “important reasons” and “rules of social coexistence”. It is assumed herein that general clauses are a kind of reference, in terms of the interpretation of provisions to generically defined norms and non-legal assessments, which have, in principle, an axiological moral justification and, consequently, that only evaluative phrases, as “rules of social coexistence” can be referred to using this term. “Important reasons”, on the other hand, are not an evaluative phrase but an estimative phrase and therefore not a general clause. It was also considered that it could not be ruled the assessment, under Article 5 of the Polish Civil Code, of the request for the regime of separate property to be established by the court or the request for the establishment of unequal shares in the common property, taking into account the extent to which each of the spouses contributed to its creation.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T03:22:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec6ddc55430540a485a789d2ee9f6726
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1731-6375
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T03:22:37Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher Maria Curie-Skłodowska University
record_format Article
series Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
spelling doaj.art-ec6ddc55430540a485a789d2ee9f67262022-12-22T00:01:20ZengMaria Curie-Skłodowska UniversityStudia Iuridica Lublinensia1731-63752020-12-0129528329910.17951/sil.2020.29.5.283-2997043Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common PropertyAgnieszka Szczekala0Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w LublinieThe purpose of the study is to determine the scope of application of the construction of abuse of subjective rights in cases involving the establishment of a regime of separate property by the court and the determination of unequal shares in the common property. The prerequisite for both the establishment of the regime of separate property and the determination of unequal shares in the common property are “important reasons”. In order to determine the admissibility of the application of Article 5 of the Polish Civil Code it is therefore necessary to define the meaning of the terms “important reasons” and “rules of social coexistence”. It is assumed herein that general clauses are a kind of reference, in terms of the interpretation of provisions to generically defined norms and non-legal assessments, which have, in principle, an axiological moral justification and, consequently, that only evaluative phrases, as “rules of social coexistence” can be referred to using this term. “Important reasons”, on the other hand, are not an evaluative phrase but an estimative phrase and therefore not a general clause. It was also considered that it could not be ruled the assessment, under Article 5 of the Polish Civil Code, of the request for the regime of separate property to be established by the court or the request for the establishment of unequal shares in the common property, taking into account the extent to which each of the spouses contributed to its creation.https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/9945rozdzielność majątkowanierówne udziały w majątku wspólnymnadużycie prawa podmiotowegozasady współżycia społecznegoważne powody
spellingShingle Agnieszka Szczekala
Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
rozdzielność majątkowa
nierówne udziały w majątku wspólnym
nadużycie prawa podmiotowego
zasady współżycia społecznego
ważne powody
title Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
title_full Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
title_fullStr Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
title_full_unstemmed Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
title_short Abuse of Subjective Right in Cases of Establishing a Regime of Separate Property and Determining Unequal Shares in the Common Property
title_sort abuse of subjective right in cases of establishing a regime of separate property and determining unequal shares in the common property
topic rozdzielność majątkowa
nierówne udziały w majątku wspólnym
nadużycie prawa podmiotowego
zasady współżycia społecznego
ważne powody
url https://journals.umcs.pl/sil/article/view/9945
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkaszczekala abuseofsubjectiverightincasesofestablishingaregimeofseparatepropertyanddeterminingunequalsharesinthecommonproperty