Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE:There is a heated debate on whether the prognostic value of SPARC is favorable or unfavorable. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between SPARC expression and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS:We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Scien...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei Han, Fang Cao, Min-bin Chen, Rong-zhu Lu, Hua-bing Wang, Min Yu, Chun-tao Shi, Hou-zhong Ding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4701416?pdf=render
_version_ 1819195076322000896
author Wei Han
Fang Cao
Min-bin Chen
Rong-zhu Lu
Hua-bing Wang
Min Yu
Chun-tao Shi
Hou-zhong Ding
author_facet Wei Han
Fang Cao
Min-bin Chen
Rong-zhu Lu
Hua-bing Wang
Min Yu
Chun-tao Shi
Hou-zhong Ding
author_sort Wei Han
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVE:There is a heated debate on whether the prognostic value of SPARC is favorable or unfavorable. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between SPARC expression and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS:We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for relevant articles. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95%CI of overall survival (OS) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of SPARC expression in patients with pancreatic cancer. We also performed subgroup analyses. RESULTS:With 1623 patients pooled from 10 available studies, the incorporative HR showed an unfavorable prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer in the multivariate analysis (HR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.11-2.17, P = 0.01), but not in univariate analysis (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 0.47-4.21, P = 0.54) and estimate (HR = 1.24, 95%CI: 0.72-2.13, P = 0.44). And this adverse impact could also be found in the subgroup analyses in multivariate analysis, especially in the stroma (HR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.05-2.24, P = 0.03). However, the combined HR had the highly significant heterogeneity. No obvious publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS:SPARC might be an unfavorable indicator in patients with pancreatic cancer, especially in the stroma. More and further researches should be conducted to reveal the prognostic value of SPARC.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T02:07:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec7a7f206b28405ca71324a62adf4842
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T02:07:00Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ec7a7f206b28405ca71324a62adf48422022-12-21T18:03:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01111e014580310.1371/journal.pone.0145803Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Wei HanFang CaoMin-bin ChenRong-zhu LuHua-bing WangMin YuChun-tao ShiHou-zhong DingOBJECTIVE:There is a heated debate on whether the prognostic value of SPARC is favorable or unfavorable. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between SPARC expression and the prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS:We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for relevant articles. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95%CI of overall survival (OS) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of SPARC expression in patients with pancreatic cancer. We also performed subgroup analyses. RESULTS:With 1623 patients pooled from 10 available studies, the incorporative HR showed an unfavorable prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer in the multivariate analysis (HR = 1.55, 95%CI: 1.11-2.17, P = 0.01), but not in univariate analysis (HR = 1.41, 95%CI: 0.47-4.21, P = 0.54) and estimate (HR = 1.24, 95%CI: 0.72-2.13, P = 0.44). And this adverse impact could also be found in the subgroup analyses in multivariate analysis, especially in the stroma (HR = 1.53, 95%CI: 1.05-2.24, P = 0.03). However, the combined HR had the highly significant heterogeneity. No obvious publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS:SPARC might be an unfavorable indicator in patients with pancreatic cancer, especially in the stroma. More and further researches should be conducted to reveal the prognostic value of SPARC.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4701416?pdf=render
spellingShingle Wei Han
Fang Cao
Min-bin Chen
Rong-zhu Lu
Hua-bing Wang
Min Yu
Chun-tao Shi
Hou-zhong Ding
Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_short Prognostic Value of SPARC in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
title_sort prognostic value of sparc in patients with pancreatic cancer a systematic review and meta analysis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4701416?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT weihan prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangcao prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minbinchen prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rongzhulu prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huabingwang prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT minyu prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chuntaoshi prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT houzhongding prognosticvalueofsparcinpatientswithpancreaticcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis