The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis

Abstract This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in recent decades. We searched multiple databases for articles published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 202...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wei-Chieh Lee, Po-Jui Wu, Chih-Yuan Fang, Hsiu-Yu Fang, Chiung-Jen Wu, Ping-Yen Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-05-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11763-y
_version_ 1818203768443895808
author Wei-Chieh Lee
Po-Jui Wu
Chih-Yuan Fang
Hsiu-Yu Fang
Chiung-Jen Wu
Ping-Yen Liu
author_facet Wei-Chieh Lee
Po-Jui Wu
Chih-Yuan Fang
Hsiu-Yu Fang
Chiung-Jen Wu
Ping-Yen Liu
author_sort Wei-Chieh Lee
collection DOAJ
description Abstract This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in recent decades. We searched multiple databases for articles published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Six observational studies with 11,736 patients were analyzed. Data included baseline demographics, Japan-chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score, sheath size, PCI vessel, retrograde method, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. The more prevalent target CTO vessel was the left coronary artery in the TRA group and the right coronary artery in the TFA group. Higher J-CTO score, longer procedural time, and more contrast volume were seen in the TFA group. In comparison, the TRA group had better procedural success rate (odds ratio (OR), 0.846; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.749–0.956) and less vascular complications (OR, 0.323; 95% CI 0.203–0.515), but similar retrograde success rate (OR, 0.965; 95% CI 0.382–2.435). In-hospital death (OR, 0.527; 95% CI 0.187–1.489) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.729; 95% CI 0.504–1.054) did not differ between the groups. Overall, fewer vascular complications and higher procedural success rates were noted in the TRA CTO PCI population. However, similar retrograde success rates and clinical outcomes were noted between the groups.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T03:30:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec830ef2d41948f8aafe4997cb209a61
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T03:30:35Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-ec830ef2d41948f8aafe4997cb209a612022-12-22T00:39:56ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-05-011211810.1038/s41598-022-11763-yThe comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysisWei-Chieh Lee0Po-Jui Wu1Chih-Yuan Fang2Hsiu-Yu Fang3Chiung-Jen Wu4Ping-Yen Liu5Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of MedicineDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of MedicineDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of MedicineDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of MedicineInstitute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung UniversityAbstract This meta-analysis compared the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) and transfemoral access (TFA) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in recent decades. We searched multiple databases for articles published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020. Six observational studies with 11,736 patients were analyzed. Data included baseline demographics, Japan-chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score, sheath size, PCI vessel, retrograde method, procedural time, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. The more prevalent target CTO vessel was the left coronary artery in the TRA group and the right coronary artery in the TFA group. Higher J-CTO score, longer procedural time, and more contrast volume were seen in the TFA group. In comparison, the TRA group had better procedural success rate (odds ratio (OR), 0.846; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.749–0.956) and less vascular complications (OR, 0.323; 95% CI 0.203–0.515), but similar retrograde success rate (OR, 0.965; 95% CI 0.382–2.435). In-hospital death (OR, 0.527; 95% CI 0.187–1.489) and major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.729; 95% CI 0.504–1.054) did not differ between the groups. Overall, fewer vascular complications and higher procedural success rates were noted in the TRA CTO PCI population. However, similar retrograde success rates and clinical outcomes were noted between the groups.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11763-y
spellingShingle Wei-Chieh Lee
Po-Jui Wu
Chih-Yuan Fang
Hsiu-Yu Fang
Chiung-Jen Wu
Ping-Yen Liu
The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
Scientific Reports
title The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
title_full The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
title_short The comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention: a meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of efficacy and safety between transradial and transfemoral approach for chronic total occlusions intervention a meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11763-y
work_keys_str_mv AT weichiehlee thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT pojuiwu thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT chihyuanfang thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT hsiuyufang thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT chiungjenwu thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT pingyenliu thecomparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT weichiehlee comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT pojuiwu comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT chihyuanfang comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT hsiuyufang comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT chiungjenwu comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis
AT pingyenliu comparisonofefficacyandsafetybetweentransradialandtransfemoralapproachforchronictotalocclusionsinterventionametaanalysis