Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes

In this study, we explore knowledge regimes shaping the ongoing transformation of medical identities. We accomplish this through a text-based analysis of published studies reporting on interventions into the membership, content, or process of morbidity and mortality rounds. Historically a site for p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paula Rowland, Nathan Cupido, Mathieu Albert, Simon Kitto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001317
_version_ 1811178090630479872
author Paula Rowland
Nathan Cupido
Mathieu Albert
Simon Kitto
author_facet Paula Rowland
Nathan Cupido
Mathieu Albert
Simon Kitto
author_sort Paula Rowland
collection DOAJ
description In this study, we explore knowledge regimes shaping the ongoing transformation of medical identities. We accomplish this through a text-based analysis of published studies reporting on interventions into the membership, content, or process of morbidity and mortality rounds. Historically a site for physicians to discuss medical error, these rounds still feature strongly in efforts to improve patient safety. In this way, changes to morbidity and mortality rounds offer a window into shifting knowledge regimes being realized in clinical workplaces and sites of medical education. Following a systematic search process, our dataset included 54 studies published between 1992 and 2020. Using Foucault's concept of governmentality as a sensitizing device in our analysis of these texts, we found that morbidity and mortality rounds were being changed to align with the rationales and identities associated with evidence-based medicine, quality improvement/patient safety practices, or a combination of both. However, those combinations were not always smooth. In some ways, our analysis confirms the ongoing penetration of evidence-based medicine rationales in the profession of medicine. Our analysis also shows the competing dynamics of quality improvement and patient safety regimes. If the identities available for participants enrolled in evidence-based medicine include engaging as librarians or researchers, then the identities invited in the quality improvement/patient safety regimes centre around the notion of “safety scientists”. The future question is whether these belief systems and associated knowledge practices compete, complement, or mix together in some new configuration. Ultimately, we argue for further explorations of the changing nature of knowledge practices and associated knowledge regimes intersecting with the profession of medicine.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T06:13:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec9a7e4afadd440bb43196532670d967
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-3215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T06:13:37Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
spelling doaj.art-ec9a7e4afadd440bb43196532670d9672022-12-22T04:41:09ZengElsevierSSM: Qualitative Research in Health2667-32152022-12-012100169Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimesPaula Rowland0Nathan Cupido1Mathieu Albert2Simon Kitto3Temerty Faculty of Medicine Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto Scientist, Canada; Wilson Centre for Research in Education and MD Education, University Health Network/University of Toronto Scientist, Canada; The Institute for Education Research, University Health Network, Canada; Corresponding author. Wilson Centre 1 ES-565, 200 Elizabeth Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada.Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation and Wilson Centre, Health Professions Education Research, CanadaTemerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Canada; Wilson Centre for Research in Education, University Health Network/University of Toronto, CanadaDepartment of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Canada; Office of Continuing Professional Development, University of Ottawa, CanadaIn this study, we explore knowledge regimes shaping the ongoing transformation of medical identities. We accomplish this through a text-based analysis of published studies reporting on interventions into the membership, content, or process of morbidity and mortality rounds. Historically a site for physicians to discuss medical error, these rounds still feature strongly in efforts to improve patient safety. In this way, changes to morbidity and mortality rounds offer a window into shifting knowledge regimes being realized in clinical workplaces and sites of medical education. Following a systematic search process, our dataset included 54 studies published between 1992 and 2020. Using Foucault's concept of governmentality as a sensitizing device in our analysis of these texts, we found that morbidity and mortality rounds were being changed to align with the rationales and identities associated with evidence-based medicine, quality improvement/patient safety practices, or a combination of both. However, those combinations were not always smooth. In some ways, our analysis confirms the ongoing penetration of evidence-based medicine rationales in the profession of medicine. Our analysis also shows the competing dynamics of quality improvement and patient safety regimes. If the identities available for participants enrolled in evidence-based medicine include engaging as librarians or researchers, then the identities invited in the quality improvement/patient safety regimes centre around the notion of “safety scientists”. The future question is whether these belief systems and associated knowledge practices compete, complement, or mix together in some new configuration. Ultimately, we argue for further explorations of the changing nature of knowledge practices and associated knowledge regimes intersecting with the profession of medicine.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001317Morbidity and mortality roundsEvidence-based medicinePatient safetyKnowledge regimesSystems of professions
spellingShingle Paula Rowland
Nathan Cupido
Mathieu Albert
Simon Kitto
Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
SSM: Qualitative Research in Health
Morbidity and mortality rounds
Evidence-based medicine
Patient safety
Knowledge regimes
Systems of professions
title Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
title_full Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
title_fullStr Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
title_full_unstemmed Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
title_short Morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature: A text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
title_sort morbidity and mortality rounds in the medical literature a text based analysis of shifting knowledge regimes
topic Morbidity and mortality rounds
Evidence-based medicine
Patient safety
Knowledge regimes
Systems of professions
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321522001317
work_keys_str_mv AT paularowland morbidityandmortalityroundsinthemedicalliteratureatextbasedanalysisofshiftingknowledgeregimes
AT nathancupido morbidityandmortalityroundsinthemedicalliteratureatextbasedanalysisofshiftingknowledgeregimes
AT mathieualbert morbidityandmortalityroundsinthemedicalliteratureatextbasedanalysisofshiftingknowledgeregimes
AT simonkitto morbidityandmortalityroundsinthemedicalliteratureatextbasedanalysisofshiftingknowledgeregimes