Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome

Objectives One-fifth of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients experience a suboptimal outcome. Incorporation of patients’ preferences in TKA assessment may improve outcomes. We determined the discriminant ability of preoperative measures of TKA need, readiness/willingness and expectations for a g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gillian A Hawker, Eric Bohm, James Stewart, Deborah A Marshall, Raj Sharma, Jason Werle, Peter Faris, Linda J Woodhouse, Bheeshma Ravi, Paul Duffy, Shannon Puloski, Kelly Johnston, Greg Abelseth, Raul Kuchinad, Tom Noseworthy, John Donaghy, C Allyson Jones, James Powell, Ian Stanaitis, Michael J Dunbar, Gillian A. Hawker, Deborah A. Marshall, Michael J. Dunbar, C. Allyson Jones, Linda J. Woodhouse, Gordon Arnett, Robert Balyk, Jeffery Bury, John Cinats, Donald Dick, D'Arcy Durand, Lee Ekert, Robert Glasgow, Don Glasgow, Gordon Goplen, Catherine Hui, Ben Herman, Larry Hunka, Hongxing Jiang, William C. Johnson, Frank Kortbeek, Guy Lavoie, Mitch Lavoie, Paul K. Leung, James Mahood, Edward Masson, Richard McLeod, James McMillan, Greg O’Connor, David Otto, Carlo Panaro, Paulose Paul, Gordon Russell, Colleen Weeks, Don Weber, Andrea Woo, Jane Squire Howden, Anne-Marie Adachi, Jessica Beatty, Shakib Rahman, Kelley De Souza, Robert Korley, Michael Monument, Maureen O'Brien, Ed Rendall, Alex Rezansoff, Scott Timmerman, Tanya Reczek, Jeffrey Depew, Bukky Dada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-01
Series:RMD Open
Online Access:https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/e002808.full
_version_ 1827965661380345856
author Gillian A Hawker
Eric Bohm
James Stewart
Deborah A Marshall
Raj Sharma
Jason Werle
Peter Faris
Linda J Woodhouse
Bheeshma Ravi
Paul Duffy
Shannon Puloski
Kelly Johnston
Greg Abelseth
Raul Kuchinad
Tom Noseworthy
John Donaghy
C Allyson Jones
James Powell
Ian Stanaitis
Michael J Dunbar
Gillian A. Hawker
Deborah A. Marshall
Michael J. Dunbar
C. Allyson Jones
Linda J. Woodhouse
Gordon Arnett
Robert Balyk
Jeffery Bury
John Cinats
Donald Dick
D'Arcy Durand
Lee Ekert
Robert Glasgow
Don Glasgow
Gordon Goplen
Catherine Hui
Ben Herman
Larry Hunka
Hongxing Jiang
William C. Johnson
Frank Kortbeek
Guy Lavoie
Mitch Lavoie
Paul K. Leung
James Mahood
Edward Masson
Richard McLeod
James McMillan
Greg O’Connor
David Otto
Carlo Panaro
Paulose Paul
Gordon Russell
Colleen Weeks
Don Weber
Andrea Woo
Jane Squire Howden
Anne-Marie Adachi
Jessica Beatty
Shakib Rahman
Kelley De Souza
Robert Korley
Michael Monument
Maureen O'Brien
Ed Rendall
Alex Rezansoff
Scott Timmerman
Tanya Reczek
Jeffrey Depew
Bukky Dada
author_facet Gillian A Hawker
Eric Bohm
James Stewart
Deborah A Marshall
Raj Sharma
Jason Werle
Peter Faris
Linda J Woodhouse
Bheeshma Ravi
Paul Duffy
Shannon Puloski
Kelly Johnston
Greg Abelseth
Raul Kuchinad
Tom Noseworthy
John Donaghy
C Allyson Jones
James Powell
Ian Stanaitis
Michael J Dunbar
Gillian A. Hawker
Deborah A. Marshall
Michael J. Dunbar
C. Allyson Jones
Linda J. Woodhouse
Gordon Arnett
Robert Balyk
Jeffery Bury
John Cinats
Donald Dick
D'Arcy Durand
Lee Ekert
Robert Glasgow
Don Glasgow
Gordon Goplen
Catherine Hui
Ben Herman
Larry Hunka
Hongxing Jiang
William C. Johnson
Frank Kortbeek
Guy Lavoie
Mitch Lavoie
Paul K. Leung
James Mahood
Edward Masson
Richard McLeod
James McMillan
Greg O’Connor
David Otto
Carlo Panaro
Paulose Paul
Gordon Russell
Colleen Weeks
Don Weber
Andrea Woo
Jane Squire Howden
Anne-Marie Adachi
Jessica Beatty
Shakib Rahman
Kelley De Souza
Robert Korley
Michael Monument
Maureen O'Brien
Ed Rendall
Alex Rezansoff
Scott Timmerman
Tanya Reczek
Jeffrey Depew
Bukky Dada
collection DOAJ
description Objectives One-fifth of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients experience a suboptimal outcome. Incorporation of patients’ preferences in TKA assessment may improve outcomes. We determined the discriminant ability of preoperative measures of TKA need, readiness/willingness and expectations for a good TKA outcome.Methods In patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary TKA, we preoperatively assessed TKA need (Western Ontario-McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) Pain Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function, arthritis coping), health status, readiness (Patient Acceptable Symptom State, depressive symptoms), willingness (definitely yes—yes/no) and expectations (outcomes deemed ‘very important’). A good outcome was defined as symptom improvement (met Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT–OARSI) responder criteria) and satisfaction with results 1 year post TKA. Using logistic regression, we assessed independent outcome predictors, model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) and the predicted probability of a good outcome for different need, readiness/willingness and expectations scenarios.Results Of 1,053 TKA recipients (mean age 66.9 years (SD 8.8); 58.6% women), 78.1% achieved a good outcome. With TKA need alone (WOMAC pain subscale, KOOS physical function short-form), model discrimination was good (AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). Inclusion of readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and expectations regarding kneeling, stair climbing, well-being and performing recreational activities improved discrimination (p=0.01; optimism corrected AUC 0.70, 0.66–0.74). The predicted probability of a good outcome ranged from 44.4% (33.9–55.5) to 92.4% (88.4–95.1) depending on level of TKA need, readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and surgical expectations.Conclusions Although external validation is required, our findings suggest that incorporation of patients’ TKA readiness, willingness and expectations in TKA decision-making may improve the proportion of recipients that experience a good outcome.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T17:36:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ec9d695506824cab8e9dde2cd32400c8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2056-5933
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T17:36:51Z
publishDate 2023-04-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series RMD Open
spelling doaj.art-ec9d695506824cab8e9dde2cd32400c82023-04-17T18:30:06ZengBMJ Publishing GroupRMD Open2056-59332023-04-019210.1136/rmdopen-2022-002808Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome 0Gillian A Hawker1Eric Bohm2James Stewart3Deborah A Marshall4Raj Sharma5Jason Werle6Peter Faris7Linda J Woodhouse8Bheeshma Ravi9Paul DuffyShannon PuloskiKelly JohnstonGreg AbelsethRaul KuchinadTom Noseworthy10John Donaghy11C Allyson Jones12James Powell13Ian Stanaitis14Michael J Dunbar15Gillian A. HawkerDeborah A. MarshallMichael J. DunbarC. Allyson JonesLinda J. WoodhouseGordon ArnettRobert BalykJeffery BuryJohn CinatsDonald DickD'Arcy DurandLee EkertRobert GlasgowDon GlasgowGordon GoplenCatherine HuiBen HermanLarry HunkaHongxing JiangWilliam C. JohnsonFrank KortbeekGuy LavoieMitch LavoiePaul K. LeungJames MahoodEdward MassonRichard McLeodJames McMillanGreg O’ConnorDavid OttoCarlo PanaroPaulose PaulGordon RussellColleen WeeksDon WeberAndrea WooJane Squire HowdenAnne-Marie AdachiJessica BeattyShakib RahmanKelley De SouzaRobert KorleyMichael MonumentMaureen O'BrienEd RendallAlex RezansoffScott TimmermanTanya ReczekJeffrey DepewBukky DadaPartners for Health and Development in Africa (PHDA), Nairobi, KenyaWomen`s College Research Institute, Women`s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery and Center for Healthcare Innovation, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada1 Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London, UKCummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada5 Respiratory Medical Franchise, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, London, UK6 Department of Surgery, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaAnalytics (DIMR), Health Services Statistical & Analytic Methods, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Phoenix, Arizona, USADivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Holland Orthopedic and Arthritic Centre, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, CanadaUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustPhysical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada2Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UKWomen`s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, CanadaDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaObjectives One-fifth of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients experience a suboptimal outcome. Incorporation of patients’ preferences in TKA assessment may improve outcomes. We determined the discriminant ability of preoperative measures of TKA need, readiness/willingness and expectations for a good TKA outcome.Methods In patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary TKA, we preoperatively assessed TKA need (Western Ontario-McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) Pain Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function, arthritis coping), health status, readiness (Patient Acceptable Symptom State, depressive symptoms), willingness (definitely yes—yes/no) and expectations (outcomes deemed ‘very important’). A good outcome was defined as symptom improvement (met Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT–OARSI) responder criteria) and satisfaction with results 1 year post TKA. Using logistic regression, we assessed independent outcome predictors, model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) and the predicted probability of a good outcome for different need, readiness/willingness and expectations scenarios.Results Of 1,053 TKA recipients (mean age 66.9 years (SD 8.8); 58.6% women), 78.1% achieved a good outcome. With TKA need alone (WOMAC pain subscale, KOOS physical function short-form), model discrimination was good (AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). Inclusion of readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and expectations regarding kneeling, stair climbing, well-being and performing recreational activities improved discrimination (p=0.01; optimism corrected AUC 0.70, 0.66–0.74). The predicted probability of a good outcome ranged from 44.4% (33.9–55.5) to 92.4% (88.4–95.1) depending on level of TKA need, readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and surgical expectations.Conclusions Although external validation is required, our findings suggest that incorporation of patients’ TKA readiness, willingness and expectations in TKA decision-making may improve the proportion of recipients that experience a good outcome.https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/e002808.full
spellingShingle Gillian A Hawker
Eric Bohm
James Stewart
Deborah A Marshall
Raj Sharma
Jason Werle
Peter Faris
Linda J Woodhouse
Bheeshma Ravi
Paul Duffy
Shannon Puloski
Kelly Johnston
Greg Abelseth
Raul Kuchinad
Tom Noseworthy
John Donaghy
C Allyson Jones
James Powell
Ian Stanaitis
Michael J Dunbar
Gillian A. Hawker
Deborah A. Marshall
Michael J. Dunbar
C. Allyson Jones
Linda J. Woodhouse
Gordon Arnett
Robert Balyk
Jeffery Bury
John Cinats
Donald Dick
D'Arcy Durand
Lee Ekert
Robert Glasgow
Don Glasgow
Gordon Goplen
Catherine Hui
Ben Herman
Larry Hunka
Hongxing Jiang
William C. Johnson
Frank Kortbeek
Guy Lavoie
Mitch Lavoie
Paul K. Leung
James Mahood
Edward Masson
Richard McLeod
James McMillan
Greg O’Connor
David Otto
Carlo Panaro
Paulose Paul
Gordon Russell
Colleen Weeks
Don Weber
Andrea Woo
Jane Squire Howden
Anne-Marie Adachi
Jessica Beatty
Shakib Rahman
Kelley De Souza
Robert Korley
Michael Monument
Maureen O'Brien
Ed Rendall
Alex Rezansoff
Scott Timmerman
Tanya Reczek
Jeffrey Depew
Bukky Dada
Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
RMD Open
title Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
title_full Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
title_fullStr Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
title_full_unstemmed Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
title_short Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
title_sort patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome
url https://rmdopen.bmj.com/content/9/2/e002808.full
work_keys_str_mv AT patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gillianahawker patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT ericbohm patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jamesstewart patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT deborahamarshall patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT rajsharma patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jasonwerle patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT peterfaris patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT lindajwoodhouse patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT bheeshmaravi patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT paulduffy patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT shannonpuloski patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT kellyjohnston patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gregabelseth patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT raulkuchinad patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT tomnoseworthy patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT johndonaghy patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT callysonjones patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jamespowell patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT ianstanaitis patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT michaeljdunbar patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gillianahawker patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT deborahamarshall patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT michaeljdunbar patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT callysonjones patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT lindajwoodhouse patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gordonarnett patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT robertbalyk patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jefferybury patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT johncinats patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT donalddick patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT darcydurand patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT leeekert patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT robertglasgow patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT donglasgow patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gordongoplen patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT catherinehui patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT benherman patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT larryhunka patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT hongxingjiang patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT williamcjohnson patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT frankkortbeek patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT guylavoie patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT mitchlavoie patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT paulkleung patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jamesmahood patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT edwardmasson patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT richardmcleod patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jamesmcmillan patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gregoconnor patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT davidotto patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT carlopanaro patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT paulosepaul patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT gordonrussell patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT colleenweeks patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT donweber patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT andreawoo patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT janesquirehowden patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT annemarieadachi patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jessicabeatty patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT shakibrahman patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT kelleydesouza patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT robertkorley patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT michaelmonument patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT maureenobrien patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT edrendall patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT alexrezansoff patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT scotttimmerman patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT tanyareczek patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT jeffreydepew patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome
AT bukkydada patientappropriatenessfortotalkneearthroplastyandpredictedprobabilityofagoodoutcome