Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings

Heart rate variability (HRV) is commonly used to assess autonomic functions and responses to environmental stimuli. It is usually derived from electrocardiographic signals; however, in the last few years, photoplethysmography has been successfully used to evaluate beat-to-beat time intervals and to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Basilio Vescio, Maria Salsone, Antonio Gambardella, Aldo Quattrone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-03-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/844
_version_ 1811262696916516864
author Basilio Vescio
Maria Salsone
Antonio Gambardella
Aldo Quattrone
author_facet Basilio Vescio
Maria Salsone
Antonio Gambardella
Aldo Quattrone
author_sort Basilio Vescio
collection DOAJ
description Heart rate variability (HRV) is commonly used to assess autonomic functions and responses to environmental stimuli. It is usually derived from electrocardiographic signals; however, in the last few years, photoplethysmography has been successfully used to evaluate beat-to-beat time intervals and to assess changes in the human heart rate under several conditions. The present work describes a simple design of a photoplethysmograph, using a wearable earlobe sensor. Beat-to-beat time intervals were evaluated as the time between subsequent pulses, thus generating a signal representative of heart rate variability, which was compared to RR intervals from classic electrocardiography. Twenty-minute pulse photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were taken simultaneously from 10 healthy individuals. Ten additional subjects were recorded for 24 h. Comparisons were made of raw signals and on time-domain and frequency-domain HRV parameters. There were small differences between the inter-beat intervals evaluated with the two techniques. The current findings suggest that our wearable earlobe pulse photoplethysmograph may be suitable for short and long-term home measuring and monitoring of HRV parameters.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:31:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eca5ab0e0b024dba8143eaf61114fa2b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:31:20Z
publishDate 2018-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-eca5ab0e0b024dba8143eaf61114fa2b2022-12-22T03:19:20ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202018-03-0118384410.3390/s18030844s18030844Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term RecordingsBasilio Vescio0Maria Salsone1Antonio Gambardella2Aldo Quattrone3Biotecnomed S.C.aR.L., 88100 Catanzaro, ItalyNeuroimaging Unit, Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology of the National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), 88100 Catanzaro, ItalyDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Græcia University, 88100 Catanzaro, ItalyNeuroimaging Unit, Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology of the National Research Council (IBFM-CNR), 88100 Catanzaro, ItalyHeart rate variability (HRV) is commonly used to assess autonomic functions and responses to environmental stimuli. It is usually derived from electrocardiographic signals; however, in the last few years, photoplethysmography has been successfully used to evaluate beat-to-beat time intervals and to assess changes in the human heart rate under several conditions. The present work describes a simple design of a photoplethysmograph, using a wearable earlobe sensor. Beat-to-beat time intervals were evaluated as the time between subsequent pulses, thus generating a signal representative of heart rate variability, which was compared to RR intervals from classic electrocardiography. Twenty-minute pulse photoplethysmography and ECG recordings were taken simultaneously from 10 healthy individuals. Ten additional subjects were recorded for 24 h. Comparisons were made of raw signals and on time-domain and frequency-domain HRV parameters. There were small differences between the inter-beat intervals evaluated with the two techniques. The current findings suggest that our wearable earlobe pulse photoplethysmograph may be suitable for short and long-term home measuring and monitoring of HRV parameters.http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/844electrocardiographyheart rate variabilityphotoplethysmographypulse-to-pulse intervals
spellingShingle Basilio Vescio
Maria Salsone
Antonio Gambardella
Aldo Quattrone
Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
Sensors
electrocardiography
heart rate variability
photoplethysmography
pulse-to-pulse intervals
title Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
title_full Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
title_fullStr Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
title_short Comparison between Electrocardiographic and Earlobe Pulse Photoplethysmographic Detection for Evaluating Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Subjects in Short- and Long-Term Recordings
title_sort comparison between electrocardiographic and earlobe pulse photoplethysmographic detection for evaluating heart rate variability in healthy subjects in short and long term recordings
topic electrocardiography
heart rate variability
photoplethysmography
pulse-to-pulse intervals
url http://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/18/3/844
work_keys_str_mv AT basiliovescio comparisonbetweenelectrocardiographicandearlobepulsephotoplethysmographicdetectionforevaluatingheartratevariabilityinhealthysubjectsinshortandlongtermrecordings
AT mariasalsone comparisonbetweenelectrocardiographicandearlobepulsephotoplethysmographicdetectionforevaluatingheartratevariabilityinhealthysubjectsinshortandlongtermrecordings
AT antoniogambardella comparisonbetweenelectrocardiographicandearlobepulsephotoplethysmographicdetectionforevaluatingheartratevariabilityinhealthysubjectsinshortandlongtermrecordings
AT aldoquattrone comparisonbetweenelectrocardiographicandearlobepulsephotoplethysmographicdetectionforevaluatingheartratevariabilityinhealthysubjectsinshortandlongtermrecordings