Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention

BackgroundHigh levels of psychosocial distress are correlated with worse glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c). Some interventions specifically targeting diabetes distress have been shown to lead to lower HbA1c values, but the underlying mechanisms mediating this imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mizokami-Stout, Kara, Choi, Hwajung, Richardson, Caroline R, Piatt, Gretchen, Heisler, Michele
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2021-01-01
Series:JMIR Diabetes
Online Access:https://diabetes.jmir.org/2021/1/e21400
_version_ 1818892648548663296
author Mizokami-Stout, Kara
Choi, Hwajung
Richardson, Caroline R
Piatt, Gretchen
Heisler, Michele
author_facet Mizokami-Stout, Kara
Choi, Hwajung
Richardson, Caroline R
Piatt, Gretchen
Heisler, Michele
author_sort Mizokami-Stout, Kara
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundHigh levels of psychosocial distress are correlated with worse glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c). Some interventions specifically targeting diabetes distress have been shown to lead to lower HbA1c values, but the underlying mechanisms mediating this improvement are unknown. In addition, while type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) disproportionately affects low-income racial and ethnic minority populations, it is unclear whether interventions targeting distress are differentially effective depending on participants’ baseline characteristics. ObjectiveOur objective was to evaluate the mediators and moderators that would inform interventions for improvements in both glycemic control and diabetes distress. MethodsOur target population included 290 Veterans Affairs patients with T2D enrolled in a comparative effectiveness trial of peer support alone versus technology-enhanced peer support with primary and secondary outcomes including HbA1c and diabetes distress at 6 months. Participants in both arms had significant improvements in both HbA1c and diabetes distress at 6 months, so the arms were pooled for all analyses. Goal setting, perceived competence, intrinsic motivation, and decisional conflict were evaluated as possible mediators of improvements in both diabetes distress and HbA1c. Baseline patient characteristics evaluated as potential moderators included age, race, highest level of education attained, employment status, income, health literacy, duration of diabetes, insulin use, baseline HbA1c, diabetes-specific social support, and depression. ResultsAmong the primarily African American male veterans with T2D, the median age was 63 (SD 10.2) years with a baseline mean HbA1c of 9.1% (SD 1.7%). Improvements in diabetes distress were correlated with improvements in HbA1c in both bivariate and multivariable models adjusted for age, race, health literacy, duration of diabetes, and baseline HbA1c. Improved goal setting and perceived competence were found to mediate both the improvements in diabetes distress and in HbA1c, together accounting for 20% of the effect of diabetes distress on change in HbA1c. Race and insulin use were found to be significant moderators of improvements in diabetes distress and improved HbA1c. ConclusionsPrior studies have demonstrated that some but not all interventions that improve diabetes distress can lead to improved glycemic control. This study found that both improved goal setting and perceived competence over the course of the peer support intervention mediated both improved diabetes distress and improved HbA1c. This suggests that future interventions targeting diabetes distress should also incorporate elements to increase goal setting and perceived competence. The intervention effect of improvements in diabetes distress on glycemic control in peer support may be more pronounced among White and insulin-dependent veterans. Additional research is needed to understand how to better target diabetes distress and glycemic control in other vulnerable populations.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T18:00:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecad01483e624c088bc8e2379009cdb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2371-4379
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T18:00:03Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Diabetes
spelling doaj.art-ecad01483e624c088bc8e2379009cdb72022-12-21T20:11:42ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Diabetes2371-43792021-01-0161e2140010.2196/21400Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support InterventionMizokami-Stout, KaraChoi, HwajungRichardson, Caroline RPiatt, GretchenHeisler, MicheleBackgroundHigh levels of psychosocial distress are correlated with worse glycemic control as measured by glycosylated hemoglobin levels (HbA1c). Some interventions specifically targeting diabetes distress have been shown to lead to lower HbA1c values, but the underlying mechanisms mediating this improvement are unknown. In addition, while type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) disproportionately affects low-income racial and ethnic minority populations, it is unclear whether interventions targeting distress are differentially effective depending on participants’ baseline characteristics. ObjectiveOur objective was to evaluate the mediators and moderators that would inform interventions for improvements in both glycemic control and diabetes distress. MethodsOur target population included 290 Veterans Affairs patients with T2D enrolled in a comparative effectiveness trial of peer support alone versus technology-enhanced peer support with primary and secondary outcomes including HbA1c and diabetes distress at 6 months. Participants in both arms had significant improvements in both HbA1c and diabetes distress at 6 months, so the arms were pooled for all analyses. Goal setting, perceived competence, intrinsic motivation, and decisional conflict were evaluated as possible mediators of improvements in both diabetes distress and HbA1c. Baseline patient characteristics evaluated as potential moderators included age, race, highest level of education attained, employment status, income, health literacy, duration of diabetes, insulin use, baseline HbA1c, diabetes-specific social support, and depression. ResultsAmong the primarily African American male veterans with T2D, the median age was 63 (SD 10.2) years with a baseline mean HbA1c of 9.1% (SD 1.7%). Improvements in diabetes distress were correlated with improvements in HbA1c in both bivariate and multivariable models adjusted for age, race, health literacy, duration of diabetes, and baseline HbA1c. Improved goal setting and perceived competence were found to mediate both the improvements in diabetes distress and in HbA1c, together accounting for 20% of the effect of diabetes distress on change in HbA1c. Race and insulin use were found to be significant moderators of improvements in diabetes distress and improved HbA1c. ConclusionsPrior studies have demonstrated that some but not all interventions that improve diabetes distress can lead to improved glycemic control. This study found that both improved goal setting and perceived competence over the course of the peer support intervention mediated both improved diabetes distress and improved HbA1c. This suggests that future interventions targeting diabetes distress should also incorporate elements to increase goal setting and perceived competence. The intervention effect of improvements in diabetes distress on glycemic control in peer support may be more pronounced among White and insulin-dependent veterans. Additional research is needed to understand how to better target diabetes distress and glycemic control in other vulnerable populations.https://diabetes.jmir.org/2021/1/e21400
spellingShingle Mizokami-Stout, Kara
Choi, Hwajung
Richardson, Caroline R
Piatt, Gretchen
Heisler, Michele
Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
JMIR Diabetes
title Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
title_full Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
title_fullStr Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
title_full_unstemmed Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
title_short Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: Mediator and Moderator Analysis of a Peer Support Intervention
title_sort diabetes distress and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mediator and moderator analysis of a peer support intervention
url https://diabetes.jmir.org/2021/1/e21400
work_keys_str_mv AT mizokamistoutkara diabetesdistressandglycemiccontrolintype2diabetesmediatorandmoderatoranalysisofapeersupportintervention
AT choihwajung diabetesdistressandglycemiccontrolintype2diabetesmediatorandmoderatoranalysisofapeersupportintervention
AT richardsoncaroliner diabetesdistressandglycemiccontrolintype2diabetesmediatorandmoderatoranalysisofapeersupportintervention
AT piattgretchen diabetesdistressandglycemiccontrolintype2diabetesmediatorandmoderatoranalysisofapeersupportintervention
AT heislermichele diabetesdistressandglycemiccontrolintype2diabetesmediatorandmoderatoranalysisofapeersupportintervention