The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review

Training and development programs are increasingly delivered online with numerous studies reporting no differences in learning outcomes between online and traditional learning. However, there are no established standardized methods to evaluate the effectiveness of online learning. This review aims...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason D Stemp, Debannita Ghosh, Urooj R Khan, James H Boyd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Online Learning Consortium 2022-12-01
Series:Online Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3115
_version_ 1827360151682678784
author Jason D Stemp
Debannita Ghosh
Urooj R Khan
James H Boyd
author_facet Jason D Stemp
Debannita Ghosh
Urooj R Khan
James H Boyd
author_sort Jason D Stemp
collection DOAJ
description Training and development programs are increasingly delivered online with numerous studies reporting no differences in learning outcomes between online and traditional learning. However, there are no established standardized methods to evaluate the effectiveness of online learning. This review aims to map the state of research around health-related education to determine what e-learning evaluation methods are being used, the strengths or deficiencies of these methods, and which are appropriate for measuring the effectiveness of online education. Databases searched were PubMed, ProQuest, Education Resources Information Centre, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, PsychInfo, and Medline. Studies were included if they were published between 2011 and 2021, reported health-related online education and included an evaluation component. Thirty studies were obtained from numerous countries with varied methodologies and designs. Participants ranged from undergraduate students to medical professionals. Evaluation methods included student participation, students’ reaction to the training program, self-efficacy, knowledge assessment, long-term performance, and the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework. The review identified that course evaluations, such as measuring student satisfaction scores alone, are insufficient when used to quantify learning effectiveness for online education. This was particularly important as studies are reporting these single metrics as positive effects of training interventions without justification. Suggestions within the reviewed papers were to adopt and implement an appropriate validated method within the course curriculum to evaluate learning outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecc03a446e2a4d7ead62a7015407ae81
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2472-5749
2472-5730
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T06:42:45Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Online Learning Consortium
record_format Article
series Online Learning
spelling doaj.art-ecc03a446e2a4d7ead62a7015407ae812024-02-03T08:36:24ZengOnline Learning ConsortiumOnline Learning2472-57492472-57302022-12-0126410.24059/olj.v26i4.3115The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid ReviewJason D Stemp0Debannita Ghosh1Urooj R Khan2James H Boyd3La Trobe UniversityAustralian Catholic UniversityLa Trobe UniversityLa Trobe University Training and development programs are increasingly delivered online with numerous studies reporting no differences in learning outcomes between online and traditional learning. However, there are no established standardized methods to evaluate the effectiveness of online learning. This review aims to map the state of research around health-related education to determine what e-learning evaluation methods are being used, the strengths or deficiencies of these methods, and which are appropriate for measuring the effectiveness of online education. Databases searched were PubMed, ProQuest, Education Resources Information Centre, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, PsychInfo, and Medline. Studies were included if they were published between 2011 and 2021, reported health-related online education and included an evaluation component. Thirty studies were obtained from numerous countries with varied methodologies and designs. Participants ranged from undergraduate students to medical professionals. Evaluation methods included student participation, students’ reaction to the training program, self-efficacy, knowledge assessment, long-term performance, and the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework. The review identified that course evaluations, such as measuring student satisfaction scores alone, are insufficient when used to quantify learning effectiveness for online education. This was particularly important as studies are reporting these single metrics as positive effects of training interventions without justification. Suggestions within the reviewed papers were to adopt and implement an appropriate validated method within the course curriculum to evaluate learning outcomes. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3115Assessment toolsevaluation methodlearning impact measureoutcome measuree-learningonline education
spellingShingle Jason D Stemp
Debannita Ghosh
Urooj R Khan
James H Boyd
The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
Online Learning
Assessment tools
evaluation method
learning impact measure
outcome measure
e-learning
online education
title The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
title_full The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
title_fullStr The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
title_short The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
title_sort role of evaluation methods in health related e learning a rapid review
topic Assessment tools
evaluation method
learning impact measure
outcome measure
e-learning
online education
url https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3115
work_keys_str_mv AT jasondstemp theroleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT debannitaghosh theroleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT uroojrkhan theroleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT jameshboyd theroleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT jasondstemp roleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT debannitaghosh roleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT uroojrkhan roleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview
AT jameshboyd roleofevaluationmethodsinhealthrelatedelearningarapidreview