Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center

The goal of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (CP; defined here as <30 days from the original craniectomy) to conventional cranioplasty (defined here as >30 days from the original craniectomy). A retrospective review of CPs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akal Sethi, Keanu Chee, Alia Kaakani, Kathryn Beauchamp, Jennifer Kang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mary Ann Liebert 2022-08-01
Series:Neurotrauma Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/NEUR.2022.0026
_version_ 1827374205688086528
author Akal Sethi
Keanu Chee
Alia Kaakani
Kathryn Beauchamp
Jennifer Kang
author_facet Akal Sethi
Keanu Chee
Alia Kaakani
Kathryn Beauchamp
Jennifer Kang
author_sort Akal Sethi
collection DOAJ
description The goal of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (CP; defined here as <30 days from the original craniectomy) to conventional cranioplasty (defined here as >30 days from the original craniectomy). A retrospective review of CPs performed at our institution between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. Craniectomies initially performed at other institutions were excluded. Seventy-seven CPs were included in our study. Ultra-early CP was defined as CP performed within 30 days of craniectomy whereas conventional CP occurred after 30 days. Post-operative wound infection rates, rate of return to the operating room (OR) with or without bone flap removal, operative length, and rate of post-CP hydrocephalus were compared between the two groups. Thirty-nine and 38 patients were included in the ultra-early and conventional CP groups, respectively. The average number of days to CP in the ultra-early group was 17.70???7.75 days compared to 95.70???65.60 days in the conventional group. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale upon arrival to the emergency room was 7.28???3.90 and 6.92???4.14 for the ultra-early and conventional groups, respectively. The operative time was shorter in the ultra-early cohort than that in the conventional cohort (ultra-early, 2.40???0.71?h; conventional, 3.00???1.63?h; p?=?0.0336). The incidence of post-CP hydrocephalus was also lower in the ultra-early cohort (ultra-early, 10.3%; conventional, 31.6%; p?=?0.026). No statistically significant differences were observed regarding post-operative infection, return to the OR, or bone flap removal. Our study shows that ultra-early CP can significantly reduce the rate of post-CP hydrocephalus, as well as operative time in comparison to conventional CP. However, the timing of CP post-DC should remain a patient-centered consideration.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:29:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecc482a62cd043c4b535332c4e3893af
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2689-288X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:29:34Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Mary Ann Liebert
record_format Article
series Neurotrauma Reports
spelling doaj.art-ecc482a62cd043c4b535332c4e3893af2024-01-26T04:34:32ZengMary Ann LiebertNeurotrauma Reports2689-288X2022-08-013128629110.1089/NEUR.2022.0026Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma CenterAkal SethiKeanu CheeAlia KaakaniKathryn BeauchampJennifer KangThe goal of this study was to ascertain the efficacy, safety, and comparability of ultra-early cranioplasty (CP; defined here as <30 days from the original craniectomy) to conventional cranioplasty (defined here as >30 days from the original craniectomy). A retrospective review of CPs performed at our institution between January 2016 and July 2020 was performed. Craniectomies initially performed at other institutions were excluded. Seventy-seven CPs were included in our study. Ultra-early CP was defined as CP performed within 30 days of craniectomy whereas conventional CP occurred after 30 days. Post-operative wound infection rates, rate of return to the operating room (OR) with or without bone flap removal, operative length, and rate of post-CP hydrocephalus were compared between the two groups. Thirty-nine and 38 patients were included in the ultra-early and conventional CP groups, respectively. The average number of days to CP in the ultra-early group was 17.70???7.75 days compared to 95.70???65.60 days in the conventional group. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale upon arrival to the emergency room was 7.28???3.90 and 6.92???4.14 for the ultra-early and conventional groups, respectively. The operative time was shorter in the ultra-early cohort than that in the conventional cohort (ultra-early, 2.40???0.71?h; conventional, 3.00???1.63?h; p?=?0.0336). The incidence of post-CP hydrocephalus was also lower in the ultra-early cohort (ultra-early, 10.3%; conventional, 31.6%; p?=?0.026). No statistically significant differences were observed regarding post-operative infection, return to the OR, or bone flap removal. Our study shows that ultra-early CP can significantly reduce the rate of post-CP hydrocephalus, as well as operative time in comparison to conventional CP. However, the timing of CP post-DC should remain a patient-centered consideration.https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/NEUR.2022.0026cranioplastydecompressive craniectomytraumatic brain injuryultra-early cranioplasty
spellingShingle Akal Sethi
Keanu Chee
Alia Kaakani
Kathryn Beauchamp
Jennifer Kang
Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
Neurotrauma Reports
cranioplasty
decompressive craniectomy
traumatic brain injury
ultra-early cranioplasty
title Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
title_full Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
title_fullStr Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
title_full_unstemmed Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
title_short Ultra-Early Cranioplasty versus Conventional Cranioplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Level 1 Trauma Center
title_sort ultra early cranioplasty versus conventional cranioplasty a retrospective cohort study at an academic level 1 trauma center
topic cranioplasty
decompressive craniectomy
traumatic brain injury
ultra-early cranioplasty
url https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/NEUR.2022.0026
work_keys_str_mv AT akalsethi ultraearlycranioplastyversusconventionalcranioplastyaretrospectivecohortstudyatanacademiclevel1traumacenter
AT keanuchee ultraearlycranioplastyversusconventionalcranioplastyaretrospectivecohortstudyatanacademiclevel1traumacenter
AT aliakaakani ultraearlycranioplastyversusconventionalcranioplastyaretrospectivecohortstudyatanacademiclevel1traumacenter
AT kathrynbeauchamp ultraearlycranioplastyversusconventionalcranioplastyaretrospectivecohortstudyatanacademiclevel1traumacenter
AT jenniferkang ultraearlycranioplastyversusconventionalcranioplastyaretrospectivecohortstudyatanacademiclevel1traumacenter