Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the optimal tumor diameter for predicting lymphatic metastasis and to determine intraoperatively the need for lymph node dissection in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. Methods: Military beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I–III endometrioid endomet...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: McKayla J. Riggs, Callie M. Cox Bauer, Caela R. Miller, James K. Aden, Scott A. Kamelle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Advocate Aurora Health 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1768&context=jpcrr
_version_ 1797934645792210944
author McKayla J. Riggs
Callie M. Cox Bauer
Caela R. Miller
James K. Aden
Scott A. Kamelle
author_facet McKayla J. Riggs
Callie M. Cox Bauer
Caela R. Miller
James K. Aden
Scott A. Kamelle
author_sort McKayla J. Riggs
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: This study aimed to assess the optimal tumor diameter for predicting lymphatic metastasis and to determine intraoperatively the need for lymph node dissection in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. Methods: Military beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I–III endometrioid endometrial cancer during 2003–2016 who had at least 7 pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes removed during the time of hysterectomy were studied. Tumor diameter was compared against the presence of positive nodes, using the prior models of 20 mm (ie, Mayo model) and 50 mm (ie, Milwaukee model), to determine the false-negative rate of each threshold. A separate analysis was completed to determine the optimal diameter for our population. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis models of tumor diameter were evaluated for model fit and predictive power of lymph node involvement. Results: Of the 1224 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer included, 13% (n = 160) had positive lymph node involvement. Tumor sizes ranged from 1 mm to 100 mm. In contrast to Mayo and Milwaukee models (ie, Mayo, Milwaukee), the optimal tumor diameter independent of myometrial invasion and grade of tumor to predict lymph node metastasis was found to be 35 mm. Conclusions: Endometrioid endometrial cancer tumor diameter of 35 mm was found to be the optimal threshold for lymphadenectomy when the operating surgeon has no knowledge of tumor invasion.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:02:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eccab4f18719422dae3f4c59d5d5a000
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2330-0698
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:02:11Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Advocate Aurora Health
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
spelling doaj.art-eccab4f18719422dae3f4c59d5d5a0002023-02-02T15:05:16ZengAdvocate Aurora HealthJournal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews2330-06982020-10-017432332810.17294/2330-0698.1768Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node MappingMcKayla J. Riggs0Callie M. Cox Bauer1Caela R. Miller2James K. Aden3Scott A. Kamelle4Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TXBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX; Aurora Sinai Medical Center, Milwaukee, WIBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TXBrooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TXAurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, WIPurpose: This study aimed to assess the optimal tumor diameter for predicting lymphatic metastasis and to determine intraoperatively the need for lymph node dissection in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer. Methods: Military beneficiaries diagnosed with stage I–III endometrioid endometrial cancer during 2003–2016 who had at least 7 pelvic and/or paraaortic lymph nodes removed during the time of hysterectomy were studied. Tumor diameter was compared against the presence of positive nodes, using the prior models of 20 mm (ie, Mayo model) and 50 mm (ie, Milwaukee model), to determine the false-negative rate of each threshold. A separate analysis was completed to determine the optimal diameter for our population. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis models of tumor diameter were evaluated for model fit and predictive power of lymph node involvement. Results: Of the 1224 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer included, 13% (n = 160) had positive lymph node involvement. Tumor sizes ranged from 1 mm to 100 mm. In contrast to Mayo and Milwaukee models (ie, Mayo, Milwaukee), the optimal tumor diameter independent of myometrial invasion and grade of tumor to predict lymph node metastasis was found to be 35 mm. Conclusions: Endometrioid endometrial cancer tumor diameter of 35 mm was found to be the optimal threshold for lymphadenectomy when the operating surgeon has no knowledge of tumor invasion.https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1768&context=jpcrrendometrioid endometrial cancerlymph node involvementtumor diameterlymphadenectomy
spellingShingle McKayla J. Riggs
Callie M. Cox Bauer
Caela R. Miller
James K. Aden
Scott A. Kamelle
Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
endometrioid endometrial cancer
lymph node involvement
tumor diameter
lymphadenectomy
title Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
title_full Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
title_fullStr Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
title_short Validation of an Endometrial Tumor Diameter Model for Risk Assessment in the Absence of Lymph Node Mapping
title_sort validation of an endometrial tumor diameter model for risk assessment in the absence of lymph node mapping
topic endometrioid endometrial cancer
lymph node involvement
tumor diameter
lymphadenectomy
url https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1768&context=jpcrr
work_keys_str_mv AT mckaylajriggs validationofanendometrialtumordiametermodelforriskassessmentintheabsenceoflymphnodemapping
AT calliemcoxbauer validationofanendometrialtumordiametermodelforriskassessmentintheabsenceoflymphnodemapping
AT caelarmiller validationofanendometrialtumordiametermodelforriskassessmentintheabsenceoflymphnodemapping
AT jameskaden validationofanendometrialtumordiametermodelforriskassessmentintheabsenceoflymphnodemapping
AT scottakamelle validationofanendometrialtumordiametermodelforriskassessmentintheabsenceoflymphnodemapping