Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy

Introduction: At present, the main treatment of gastric cancer is surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the most important part of which is radical gastrectomy. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is difficult to operate, and whether it can achieve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Jiao, Shaozhuang Liu, Cheng Chen, A. Maimaiti, Qingsi He, Sanyuan Hu, Wenbin Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2020;volume=16;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Jiao
_version_ 1818524015578316800
author Jie Jiao
Shaozhuang Liu
Cheng Chen
A. Maimaiti
Qingsi He
Sanyuan Hu
Wenbin Yu
author_facet Jie Jiao
Shaozhuang Liu
Cheng Chen
A. Maimaiti
Qingsi He
Sanyuan Hu
Wenbin Yu
author_sort Jie Jiao
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: At present, the main treatment of gastric cancer is surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the most important part of which is radical gastrectomy. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is difficult to operate, and whether it can achieve the same curative effect with the laparotomy is still controversial. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 269 gastric cancer patients surgically treated by our medical team from May 2011 to December 2015 for comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy and traditional open radical gastrectomy. Results: The laparoscopic surgery group had longer duration of surgery, less intra-operative blood loss, shorter post-operative exhaust time, shorter post-operative hospital stay and shorter timing of drain removal. The average number of harvested lymph nodes in the laparoscopic surgery group was 22.9 ± 9.5 per case. And in the laparotomy group the average number was 23.3 ± 9.9 per case. The difference had no statistical significance. With the increase of the number of laparoscopic surgical procedures, the amount of intra-operative blood loss gradually decreases, and the duration of surgery is gradually reduced. Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is superior to open surgery in the aspects of intra-operative blood loss, post-operative exhaust time, post-operative hospital stay and timing of drain removal. With the number of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy cases increased, the duration of surgery is shortened and the amount of intra-operative blood loss will decrease.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T05:51:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecce5749c84e4f21a1300558e131989f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0972-9941
1998-3921
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T05:51:57Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
spelling doaj.art-ecce5749c84e4f21a1300558e131989f2022-12-22T01:18:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Minimal Access Surgery0972-99411998-39212020-01-01161414610.4103/jmas.JMAS_155_18Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomyJie JiaoShaozhuang LiuCheng ChenA. MaimaitiQingsi HeSanyuan HuWenbin YuIntroduction: At present, the main treatment of gastric cancer is surgical resection combined with radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the most important part of which is radical gastrectomy. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer is difficult to operate, and whether it can achieve the same curative effect with the laparotomy is still controversial. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 269 gastric cancer patients surgically treated by our medical team from May 2011 to December 2015 for comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy and traditional open radical gastrectomy. Results: The laparoscopic surgery group had longer duration of surgery, less intra-operative blood loss, shorter post-operative exhaust time, shorter post-operative hospital stay and shorter timing of drain removal. The average number of harvested lymph nodes in the laparoscopic surgery group was 22.9 ± 9.5 per case. And in the laparotomy group the average number was 23.3 ± 9.9 per case. The difference had no statistical significance. With the increase of the number of laparoscopic surgical procedures, the amount of intra-operative blood loss gradually decreases, and the duration of surgery is gradually reduced. Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is superior to open surgery in the aspects of intra-operative blood loss, post-operative exhaust time, post-operative hospital stay and timing of drain removal. With the number of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy cases increased, the duration of surgery is shortened and the amount of intra-operative blood loss will decrease.http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2020;volume=16;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Jiaogastric cancerlaparoscopic surgerylearning curves
spellingShingle Jie Jiao
Shaozhuang Liu
Cheng Chen
A. Maimaiti
Qingsi He
Sanyuan Hu
Wenbin Yu
Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery
gastric cancer
laparoscopic surgery
learning curves
title Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
title_full Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
title_fullStr Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
title_short Comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
title_sort comparative study of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrectomy
topic gastric cancer
laparoscopic surgery
learning curves
url http://www.journalofmas.com/article.asp?issn=0972-9941;year=2020;volume=16;issue=1;spage=41;epage=46;aulast=Jiao
work_keys_str_mv AT jiejiao comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT shaozhuangliu comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT chengchen comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT amaimaiti comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT qingsihe comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT sanyuanhu comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy
AT wenbinyu comparativestudyoflaparoscopicradicalgastrectomyandopenradicalgastrectomy