Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method
Nowadays desertification, as a global problem, affects many countries in the world, especially developing countries like Iran. With respect to increasing importance of desertification and its complexity, the necessity of attention to the optimal combating-desertification alternatives is essential. S...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2016-04-01
|
| Series: | Solid Earth |
| Online Access: | http://www.solid-earth.net/7/673/2016/se-7-673-2016.pdf |
| _version_ | 1818033092949966848 |
|---|---|
| author | M. H. Sadeghravesh H. Khosravi S. Ghasemian |
| author_facet | M. H. Sadeghravesh H. Khosravi S. Ghasemian |
| author_sort | M. H. Sadeghravesh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Nowadays desertification, as a global problem, affects many countries in the
world, especially developing countries like Iran. With respect to increasing
importance of desertification and its complexity, the necessity of attention
to the optimal combating-desertification alternatives is essential.
Selecting appropriate strategies according to all effective criteria to
combat the desertification process can be useful in rehabilitating
degraded lands and avoiding degradation in vulnerable fields. This study
provides systematic and optimal strategies of combating desertification by
use of a
group decision-making model. To this end, the preferences of indexes were
obtained through using the Delphi model, within the framework of multi-attribute
decision making (MADM). Then, priorities of strategies were evaluated by
using linear assignment (LA) method. According to the results, the
strategies to prevent improper change of land use (<i>A</i><sub>18</sub>), development and
reclamation of plant cover (<i>A</i><sub>23</sub>), and control overcharging of groundwater
resources (<i>A</i><sub>31</sub>) were identified as the most important
strategies for combating desertification in this study area. Therefore, it
is suggested that the aforementioned ranking results be considered in
projects which control and reduce the effects of desertification and
rehabilitate degraded lands. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T06:17:47Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ecd17105e9d2429198412a01d15c273e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1869-9510 1869-9529 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T06:17:47Z |
| publishDate | 2016-04-01 |
| publisher | Copernicus Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Solid Earth |
| spelling | doaj.art-ecd17105e9d2429198412a01d15c273e2022-12-22T01:59:25ZengCopernicus PublicationsSolid Earth1869-95101869-95292016-04-017267368310.5194/se-7-673-2016Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment methodM. H. Sadeghravesh0H. Khosravi1S. Ghasemian2Department of Environment, College of Agriculture, Takestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Takestan, IranDepartment of Arid and Mountainous Reclamation Region, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranDepartment of Arid and Mountainous Reclamation Region, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, IranNowadays desertification, as a global problem, affects many countries in the world, especially developing countries like Iran. With respect to increasing importance of desertification and its complexity, the necessity of attention to the optimal combating-desertification alternatives is essential. Selecting appropriate strategies according to all effective criteria to combat the desertification process can be useful in rehabilitating degraded lands and avoiding degradation in vulnerable fields. This study provides systematic and optimal strategies of combating desertification by use of a group decision-making model. To this end, the preferences of indexes were obtained through using the Delphi model, within the framework of multi-attribute decision making (MADM). Then, priorities of strategies were evaluated by using linear assignment (LA) method. According to the results, the strategies to prevent improper change of land use (<i>A</i><sub>18</sub>), development and reclamation of plant cover (<i>A</i><sub>23</sub>), and control overcharging of groundwater resources (<i>A</i><sub>31</sub>) were identified as the most important strategies for combating desertification in this study area. Therefore, it is suggested that the aforementioned ranking results be considered in projects which control and reduce the effects of desertification and rehabilitate degraded lands.http://www.solid-earth.net/7/673/2016/se-7-673-2016.pdf |
| spellingShingle | M. H. Sadeghravesh H. Khosravi S. Ghasemian Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method Solid Earth |
| title | Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| title_full | Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| title_fullStr | Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| title_short | Assessment of combating-desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| title_sort | assessment of combating desertification strategies using the linear assignment method |
| url | http://www.solid-earth.net/7/673/2016/se-7-673-2016.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mhsadeghravesh assessmentofcombatingdesertificationstrategiesusingthelinearassignmentmethod AT hkhosravi assessmentofcombatingdesertificationstrategiesusingthelinearassignmentmethod AT sghasemian assessmentofcombatingdesertificationstrategiesusingthelinearassignmentmethod |