Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease

Abstract Background Minimally invasive transcatheter approaches were usually done for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. There are two ways to establish vascular access, by using transfemoral either femoral vein (FV) or femoral artery (FA) and transcarotid arte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Made Satria Yudha Dewangga, Radityo Prakoso, Anna Ulfah Rahajoe, Oktavia Lilyasari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2023-06-01
Series:The Egyptian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-023-00371-4
_version_ 1827922974669275136
author Made Satria Yudha Dewangga
Radityo Prakoso
Anna Ulfah Rahajoe
Oktavia Lilyasari
author_facet Made Satria Yudha Dewangga
Radityo Prakoso
Anna Ulfah Rahajoe
Oktavia Lilyasari
author_sort Made Satria Yudha Dewangga
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Minimally invasive transcatheter approaches were usually done for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. There are two ways to establish vascular access, by using transfemoral either femoral vein (FV) or femoral artery (FA) and transcarotid artery (CA) with surgical cutdown approach to access the PDA and then provide good support for the balloon and the stent to be safely deployed. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of transcarotid with surgical cutdown compared to the transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease. Results Overall procedural complication rates were higher in the FA/FV approach than in the CA approach (51% vs. 30%). The incidence of acute limb ischemia in the FA approach is significantly higher than in the CA approach (P < 0.05). No acute thrombosis/occlusion of the carotid artery was assessed by carotid vascular ultrasound in 2-day series. Conclusions The transcarotid approach with surgical cutdown may offer a secure and more efficient means of accessing the PDA, particularly for those emerging from the underside of the aortic arch.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:50:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecd3629d72e04758b822c44128d66be0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2090-911X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:50:01Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Heart Journal
spelling doaj.art-ecd3629d72e04758b822c44128d66be02023-06-18T11:17:39ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Heart Journal2090-911X2023-06-017511710.1186/s43044-023-00371-4Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart diseaseMade Satria Yudha Dewangga0Radityo Prakoso1Anna Ulfah Rahajoe2Oktavia Lilyasari3Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta, University of IndonesiaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta, University of IndonesiaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta, University of IndonesiaDepartment of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center Harapan Kita Jakarta, University of IndonesiaAbstract Background Minimally invasive transcatheter approaches were usually done for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. There are two ways to establish vascular access, by using transfemoral either femoral vein (FV) or femoral artery (FA) and transcarotid artery (CA) with surgical cutdown approach to access the PDA and then provide good support for the balloon and the stent to be safely deployed. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of transcarotid with surgical cutdown compared to the transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease. Results Overall procedural complication rates were higher in the FA/FV approach than in the CA approach (51% vs. 30%). The incidence of acute limb ischemia in the FA approach is significantly higher than in the CA approach (P < 0.05). No acute thrombosis/occlusion of the carotid artery was assessed by carotid vascular ultrasound in 2-day series. Conclusions The transcarotid approach with surgical cutdown may offer a secure and more efficient means of accessing the PDA, particularly for those emerging from the underside of the aortic arch.https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-023-00371-4Vascular accessPatent ductus arteriosusSafetyEfficacyTranscarotidPDA stenting
spellingShingle Made Satria Yudha Dewangga
Radityo Prakoso
Anna Ulfah Rahajoe
Oktavia Lilyasari
Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
The Egyptian Heart Journal
Vascular access
Patent ductus arteriosus
Safety
Efficacy
Transcarotid
PDA stenting
title Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
title_full Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
title_short Efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct-dependent cyanotic heart disease
title_sort efficacy and safety of transcarotid compared to transfemoral approach of patent ductus arteriosus stenting in duct dependent cyanotic heart disease
topic Vascular access
Patent ductus arteriosus
Safety
Efficacy
Transcarotid
PDA stenting
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s43044-023-00371-4
work_keys_str_mv AT madesatriayudhadewangga efficacyandsafetyoftranscarotidcomparedtotransfemoralapproachofpatentductusarteriosusstentinginductdependentcyanoticheartdisease
AT radityoprakoso efficacyandsafetyoftranscarotidcomparedtotransfemoralapproachofpatentductusarteriosusstentinginductdependentcyanoticheartdisease
AT annaulfahrahajoe efficacyandsafetyoftranscarotidcomparedtotransfemoralapproachofpatentductusarteriosusstentinginductdependentcyanoticheartdisease
AT oktavialilyasari efficacyandsafetyoftranscarotidcomparedtotransfemoralapproachofpatentductusarteriosusstentinginductdependentcyanoticheartdisease