Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications

Background: When repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to treat medication refractory depression, the treatment pulse intensity is individualized according to motor threshold (MT). This measure is often acquired only on the first day of treatment, as per the protocol currently...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonçalo Cotovio, Albino J. Oliveira-Maia, Carter Paul, Francisco Faro Viana, Daniel Rodrigues da Silva, Carolina Seybert, Adam P. Stern, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Daniel Z. Press
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21001509
_version_ 1818736487132299264
author Gonçalo Cotovio
Albino J. Oliveira-Maia
Carter Paul
Francisco Faro Viana
Daniel Rodrigues da Silva
Carolina Seybert
Adam P. Stern
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Daniel Z. Press
author_facet Gonçalo Cotovio
Albino J. Oliveira-Maia
Carter Paul
Francisco Faro Viana
Daniel Rodrigues da Silva
Carolina Seybert
Adam P. Stern
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Daniel Z. Press
author_sort Gonçalo Cotovio
collection DOAJ
description Background: When repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to treat medication refractory depression, the treatment pulse intensity is individualized according to motor threshold (MT). This measure is often acquired only on the first day of treatment, as per the protocol currently approved by Food and Drug Administration. Objective: Here, we aimed to assess daily MT variability across an rTMS treatment course and simulate the effects of different schedules of MT assessment on treatment intensity. Methods: We conducted a naturalistic retrospective study with 374 patients from a therapeutic rTMS program for depression that measures MT daily. Results: For each patient, in almost half the TMS sessions, MT varied on average more than 5% as compared to the baseline MT acquired in the first treatment day. Such variability was only minimally impacted by having different TMS technicians acquiring MT in different days. In a smaller cohort of healthy individuals, we confirmed that the motor hotspot localization method, a critical step for accurate MT assessment, was stable in different days, arguing that daily MT variability reflects physiological variability, rather than an artifact of measurement error. Finally, in simulations of the effect of one-time MT measurement, we found that half of sessions would have been 5% or more above or below target intensity, with almost 5% of sessions 25% above target intensity. The simulated effects of weekly MT measurements were significantly improved. Conclusions: In conclusion, MT varies significantly across days, not fully dependent on methods of MT acquisition. This finding may have important implications for therapeutic rTMS practice regarding safety and suggests that regular MT assessments, daily or at least weekly, would ameliorate the effect.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T00:37:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ece9cc47a11a4ce2a05294e0aa57d666
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-861X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T00:37:56Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain Stimulation
spelling doaj.art-ece9cc47a11a4ce2a05294e0aa57d6662022-12-21T21:26:57ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2021-09-0114511181125Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implicationsGonçalo Cotovio0Albino J. Oliveira-Maia1Carter Paul2Francisco Faro Viana3Daniel Rodrigues da Silva4Carolina Seybert5Adam P. Stern6Alvaro Pascual-Leone7Daniel Z. Press8Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, MA, USA; Champalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, NMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, NMS, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalBerenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, MA, USAChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, PortugalChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, PortugalChampalimaud Research & Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, PortugalBerenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, MA, USADepartment of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research and Deanna and Sidney Wolk Center for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA, USA; Institut Guttmann de Neurorehabilitación, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, SpainBerenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02215, MA, USA; Corresponding author. Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Division of Cognitive Neurology, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 330 Brookline Ave Kirstein Building KS 158, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.Background: When repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to treat medication refractory depression, the treatment pulse intensity is individualized according to motor threshold (MT). This measure is often acquired only on the first day of treatment, as per the protocol currently approved by Food and Drug Administration. Objective: Here, we aimed to assess daily MT variability across an rTMS treatment course and simulate the effects of different schedules of MT assessment on treatment intensity. Methods: We conducted a naturalistic retrospective study with 374 patients from a therapeutic rTMS program for depression that measures MT daily. Results: For each patient, in almost half the TMS sessions, MT varied on average more than 5% as compared to the baseline MT acquired in the first treatment day. Such variability was only minimally impacted by having different TMS technicians acquiring MT in different days. In a smaller cohort of healthy individuals, we confirmed that the motor hotspot localization method, a critical step for accurate MT assessment, was stable in different days, arguing that daily MT variability reflects physiological variability, rather than an artifact of measurement error. Finally, in simulations of the effect of one-time MT measurement, we found that half of sessions would have been 5% or more above or below target intensity, with almost 5% of sessions 25% above target intensity. The simulated effects of weekly MT measurements were significantly improved. Conclusions: In conclusion, MT varies significantly across days, not fully dependent on methods of MT acquisition. This finding may have important implications for therapeutic rTMS practice regarding safety and suggests that regular MT assessments, daily or at least weekly, would ameliorate the effect.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21001509Transcranial magnetic stimulationResting motor thresholdVariabilityDepression
spellingShingle Gonçalo Cotovio
Albino J. Oliveira-Maia
Carter Paul
Francisco Faro Viana
Daniel Rodrigues da Silva
Carolina Seybert
Adam P. Stern
Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Daniel Z. Press
Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
Brain Stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Resting motor threshold
Variability
Depression
title Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
title_full Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
title_fullStr Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
title_full_unstemmed Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
title_short Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications
title_sort day to day variability in motor threshold during rtms treatment for depression clinical implications
topic Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Resting motor threshold
Variability
Depression
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X21001509
work_keys_str_mv AT goncalocotovio daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT albinojoliveiramaia daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT carterpaul daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT franciscofaroviana daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT danielrodriguesdasilva daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT carolinaseybert daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT adampstern daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT alvaropascualleone daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications
AT danielzpress daytodayvariabilityinmotorthresholdduringrtmstreatmentfordepressionclinicalimplications