The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review

Visitors are a prominent feature in the lives of zoo animals, and their presence can cause a range of impacts on zoo animals (typically classed as positive, negative or neutral impacts), commonly referred to as the ‘visitor effect’. This paper quantitatively collates the literature on the visitor ef...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ellen Williams, Violet Hunton, Geoff Hosey, Samantha J. Ward
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/7/1178
_version_ 1797608502297886720
author Ellen Williams
Violet Hunton
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
author_facet Ellen Williams
Violet Hunton
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
author_sort Ellen Williams
collection DOAJ
description Visitors are a prominent feature in the lives of zoo animals, and their presence can cause a range of impacts on zoo animals (typically classed as positive, negative or neutral impacts), commonly referred to as the ‘visitor effect’. This paper quantitatively collates the literature on the visitor effect in non-primate species, investigates the types of measures used to assess impacts of visitors on animals and considers whether impacts vary across non-primate species in zoos. In total, there were 105 papers which had investigated the impact of zoo visitors on 252 non-primate species/species groups. There has been a steady increase in visitor effect research in zoos since 2012 and this body of work incorporates species from avian (28% study species), reptilian (9%), amphibian (2%), fish (4%) and invertebrate taxa (1%). However, there is still a bias towards mammalian species (56%). The response to visitors varied across taxa. Amphibians responded negatively to visitors more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), birds responded neutrally more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and fish responded neutrally and ‘unknown’ more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This review highlighted a number of animal-based metrics which have been used to assess the impacts of visitors on animals, with measures used varying across taxa. Moving forwards, it is recommended that moving forwards researchers incorporate a suite of measures, incorporating those which are meaningful in terms of being representative of individual animal experiences and animal welfare, collected in a manner which should capture those metrics accurately.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:44:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eceecaddfcf9482081281ae8dc454fcc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:44:19Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-eceecaddfcf9482081281ae8dc454fcc2023-11-17T16:13:52ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-03-01137117810.3390/ani13071178The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative ReviewEllen Williams0Violet Hunton1Geoff Hosey2Samantha J. Ward3Department of Animal Health, Behaviour & Welfare, Harper Adams University, Newport TF10 8NB, UKDepartment of Animal Health, Behaviour & Welfare, Harper Adams University, Newport TF10 8NB, UKDeane Campus, University of Bolton, Bolton BL3 5AB, UKSchool of Animal, Rural & Environmental Sciences, Brackenhurst Campus, Nottingham Trent University, Southwell NG25 0QF, UKVisitors are a prominent feature in the lives of zoo animals, and their presence can cause a range of impacts on zoo animals (typically classed as positive, negative or neutral impacts), commonly referred to as the ‘visitor effect’. This paper quantitatively collates the literature on the visitor effect in non-primate species, investigates the types of measures used to assess impacts of visitors on animals and considers whether impacts vary across non-primate species in zoos. In total, there were 105 papers which had investigated the impact of zoo visitors on 252 non-primate species/species groups. There has been a steady increase in visitor effect research in zoos since 2012 and this body of work incorporates species from avian (28% study species), reptilian (9%), amphibian (2%), fish (4%) and invertebrate taxa (1%). However, there is still a bias towards mammalian species (56%). The response to visitors varied across taxa. Amphibians responded negatively to visitors more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05), birds responded neutrally more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and fish responded neutrally and ‘unknown’ more frequently than would be expected by chance (<i>p</i> < 0.05). This review highlighted a number of animal-based metrics which have been used to assess the impacts of visitors on animals, with measures used varying across taxa. Moving forwards, it is recommended that moving forwards researchers incorporate a suite of measures, incorporating those which are meaningful in terms of being representative of individual animal experiences and animal welfare, collected in a manner which should capture those metrics accurately.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/7/1178visitor effectnon-primate specieszoo animal welfarezoo visitors
spellingShingle Ellen Williams
Violet Hunton
Geoff Hosey
Samantha J. Ward
The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
Animals
visitor effect
non-primate species
zoo animal welfare
zoo visitors
title The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
title_full The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
title_fullStr The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
title_short The Impact of Visitors on Non-Primate Species in Zoos: A Quantitative Review
title_sort impact of visitors on non primate species in zoos a quantitative review
topic visitor effect
non-primate species
zoo animal welfare
zoo visitors
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/7/1178
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenwilliams theimpactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT violethunton theimpactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT geoffhosey theimpactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT samanthajward theimpactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT ellenwilliams impactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT violethunton impactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT geoffhosey impactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview
AT samanthajward impactofvisitorsonnonprimatespeciesinzoosaquantitativereview