The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes

Abstract Background Rushes are prominent wetland plants that are well adapted to conditions of waterlogging. Tall rushes like soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) tend to dominate the vegetation and offer a great biomass potential. Removing rush biomass is often necessary to enhance various ecosystem servi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jürgen Müller, Christian Jantzen, Denny Wiedow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:Energy, Sustainability and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00258-1
_version_ 1819087282383093760
author Jürgen Müller
Christian Jantzen
Denny Wiedow
author_facet Jürgen Müller
Christian Jantzen
Denny Wiedow
author_sort Jürgen Müller
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Rushes are prominent wetland plants that are well adapted to conditions of waterlogging. Tall rushes like soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) tend to dominate the vegetation and offer a great biomass potential. Removing rush biomass is often necessary to enhance various ecosystem services of wetlands. There is an urgent need for sustainable use of the removed biomass apart from expensive composting ore useless landfill. Methods We investigated three alternative energy utilisation routes for soft rush biomass and evaluated their energetic potential: biomethanisation via wet fermentation technique (a), biomethanisation via solid-state fermentation technique (b) and combustion (c). Batch experiments (a), experimental fermenters (b), and thermo-calorimetric equipment (c) were used to measure energy output per unit rush biomass input. Results The wet fermentation technique had significantly higher biogas yields than solid-state fermentation (399 LN kg−1 oDM compared to 258 LN kg−1 oDM). These yields constitute 59 and 43%, respectively, of the biogas potential of maize silage as a reference. Solid-state fermentation technique needs longer retention time compared to wet co-digestion to earn comparable methane yields. Soft rush biomass shows high heating values (15.06 MJ kg FMw15 −1) compared to other herbaceous solid fuels. Conclusions Low costs for substrate production make energetic utilisation of Juncus effusus an interesting alternative, if short distances between fields and biomass conversion plant can be realised. All investigated conversion routes appear promising, provided that the substrate specifics are considered in the design of the conversion technique. Besides the size of the rush dominated area and the distribution of these areas in the landscape, the investment costs and the subsidies for the conversion plant play a pivotal role in the selection of the preferred conversion path.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T21:33:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecf2418a2284453dbb44fae64f6c4a39
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2192-0567
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T21:33:40Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Energy, Sustainability and Society
spelling doaj.art-ecf2418a2284453dbb44fae64f6c4a392022-12-21T18:49:33ZengBMCEnergy, Sustainability and Society2192-05672020-07-0110111310.1186/s13705-020-00258-1The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routesJürgen Müller0Christian Jantzen1Denny Wiedow2Grassland and Forage Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of RostockBiotechnology and Process Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of RostockBiotechnology and Process Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of RostockAbstract Background Rushes are prominent wetland plants that are well adapted to conditions of waterlogging. Tall rushes like soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) tend to dominate the vegetation and offer a great biomass potential. Removing rush biomass is often necessary to enhance various ecosystem services of wetlands. There is an urgent need for sustainable use of the removed biomass apart from expensive composting ore useless landfill. Methods We investigated three alternative energy utilisation routes for soft rush biomass and evaluated their energetic potential: biomethanisation via wet fermentation technique (a), biomethanisation via solid-state fermentation technique (b) and combustion (c). Batch experiments (a), experimental fermenters (b), and thermo-calorimetric equipment (c) were used to measure energy output per unit rush biomass input. Results The wet fermentation technique had significantly higher biogas yields than solid-state fermentation (399 LN kg−1 oDM compared to 258 LN kg−1 oDM). These yields constitute 59 and 43%, respectively, of the biogas potential of maize silage as a reference. Solid-state fermentation technique needs longer retention time compared to wet co-digestion to earn comparable methane yields. Soft rush biomass shows high heating values (15.06 MJ kg FMw15 −1) compared to other herbaceous solid fuels. Conclusions Low costs for substrate production make energetic utilisation of Juncus effusus an interesting alternative, if short distances between fields and biomass conversion plant can be realised. All investigated conversion routes appear promising, provided that the substrate specifics are considered in the design of the conversion technique. Besides the size of the rush dominated area and the distribution of these areas in the landscape, the investment costs and the subsidies for the conversion plant play a pivotal role in the selection of the preferred conversion path.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00258-1Wetland biomassSoft rushEnergetic conversionBiogasDirect thermal utilisationSolid-state fermentation
spellingShingle Jürgen Müller
Christian Jantzen
Denny Wiedow
The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Wetland biomass
Soft rush
Energetic conversion
Biogas
Direct thermal utilisation
Solid-state fermentation
title The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
title_full The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
title_fullStr The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
title_full_unstemmed The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
title_short The energy potential of soft rush (Juncus effusus L.) in different conversion routes
title_sort energy potential of soft rush juncus effusus l in different conversion routes
topic Wetland biomass
Soft rush
Energetic conversion
Biogas
Direct thermal utilisation
Solid-state fermentation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-020-00258-1
work_keys_str_mv AT jurgenmuller theenergypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes
AT christianjantzen theenergypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes
AT dennywiedow theenergypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes
AT jurgenmuller energypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes
AT christianjantzen energypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes
AT dennywiedow energypotentialofsoftrushjuncuseffususlindifferentconversionroutes