Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes

Endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica; SJKF) and California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi; CAGS) occur sympatrically in many locations. CAGS can constitute a nuisance species and control strategies have included lethal measures administered within CAGS burrows. These...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian Cypher, Alyse Gabaldon, Francisco Ruiz Ponce, Erica Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: California Department of Fish and Wildlife 2023-12-01
Series:California Fish and Wildlife Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.wildlife.ca.gov/2023/12/29/comparison-of-san-joaquin-kit-fox-den-and-california-ground-squirrel-burrow-attributes/
_version_ 1797365957717393408
author Brian Cypher
Alyse Gabaldon
Francisco Ruiz Ponce
Erica Kelly
author_facet Brian Cypher
Alyse Gabaldon
Francisco Ruiz Ponce
Erica Kelly
author_sort Brian Cypher
collection DOAJ
description Endangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica; SJKF) and California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi; CAGS) occur sympatrically in many locations. CAGS can constitute a nuisance species and control strategies have included lethal measures administered within CAGS burrows. These measures could harm or kill a SJKF if mistakenly applied to an occupied SJKF den. To identify attributes to distinguish between SJKF dens and CAGS burrow, we assessed dimensions, penetration depths by 9.7-cm and 7.5-cm spheres, ejecta patterns, and the presence of various types of sign at 65 dens to which radiocollared SJKF were tracked and at 80 burrows that CAGS were observed to enter. Mean entrance height, width, and circumference all were significantly larger for SJKF den entrances. However, the ranges of values for all dimensions for the CAGS burrows completely encompassed the ranges for the SJKF dens. Penetration depths with the 7.5-cm sphere were similar for SJKF dens and CAGS burrows. The 9.7-cm sphere could not be inserted in over half of CAGS burrows and exceeded 1 m in depth in over half of the SJKF dens. Most SJKF dens had dirt berms but so did over half of the CAGS burrows. SJKF scats, prey remains, CAGS scats, and trash were observed at both SJKF dens and CAGS burrows although at different frequencies. CAGS tracks were only observed at seven CAGS burrows. None of the attributes we assessed provided unequivocal criteria for distinguishing between SJKF dens and CAGS burrows. Also, SJKF occasionally usurp CAGS burrows and CAGS occasionally move into vacant SJKF dens. Therefore, administering lethal control measures within burrows should be avoided as it presents too great a risk to SJKF as well as the many other species that also use CAGS burrows.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T16:57:22Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecf48e496e0a466580c3d0920040cabc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2689-419X
2689-4203
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T16:57:22Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher California Department of Fish and Wildlife
record_format Article
series California Fish and Wildlife Journal
spelling doaj.art-ecf48e496e0a466580c3d0920040cabc2024-01-04T22:51:03ZengCalifornia Department of Fish and WildlifeCalifornia Fish and Wildlife Journal2689-419X2689-42032023-12-01109410.51492/cfwj.109.17Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributesBrian Cypher0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7349-545XAlyse Gabaldon1Francisco Ruiz Ponce2Erica Kelly3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3033-1607California State University, Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery ProgramCalifornia State University, Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery ProgramCalifornia State University, Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery ProgramCalifornia State University, Stanislaus, Endangered Species Recovery ProgramEndangered San Joaquin kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis mutica; SJKF) and California ground squirrels (Otospermophilus beecheyi; CAGS) occur sympatrically in many locations. CAGS can constitute a nuisance species and control strategies have included lethal measures administered within CAGS burrows. These measures could harm or kill a SJKF if mistakenly applied to an occupied SJKF den. To identify attributes to distinguish between SJKF dens and CAGS burrow, we assessed dimensions, penetration depths by 9.7-cm and 7.5-cm spheres, ejecta patterns, and the presence of various types of sign at 65 dens to which radiocollared SJKF were tracked and at 80 burrows that CAGS were observed to enter. Mean entrance height, width, and circumference all were significantly larger for SJKF den entrances. However, the ranges of values for all dimensions for the CAGS burrows completely encompassed the ranges for the SJKF dens. Penetration depths with the 7.5-cm sphere were similar for SJKF dens and CAGS burrows. The 9.7-cm sphere could not be inserted in over half of CAGS burrows and exceeded 1 m in depth in over half of the SJKF dens. Most SJKF dens had dirt berms but so did over half of the CAGS burrows. SJKF scats, prey remains, CAGS scats, and trash were observed at both SJKF dens and CAGS burrows although at different frequencies. CAGS tracks were only observed at seven CAGS burrows. None of the attributes we assessed provided unequivocal criteria for distinguishing between SJKF dens and CAGS burrows. Also, SJKF occasionally usurp CAGS burrows and CAGS occasionally move into vacant SJKF dens. Therefore, administering lethal control measures within burrows should be avoided as it presents too great a risk to SJKF as well as the many other species that also use CAGS burrows.https://journal.wildlife.ca.gov/2023/12/29/comparison-of-san-joaquin-kit-fox-den-and-california-ground-squirrel-burrow-attributes/burrowscalifornia ground squirreldensotospermophilus beecheyisan joaquin kit foxvulpes macrotis mutica
spellingShingle Brian Cypher
Alyse Gabaldon
Francisco Ruiz Ponce
Erica Kelly
Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
California Fish and Wildlife Journal
burrows
california ground squirrel
dens
otospermophilus beecheyi
san joaquin kit fox
vulpes macrotis mutica
title Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
title_full Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
title_fullStr Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
title_short Comparison of San Joaquin kit fox den and California ground squirrel burrow attributes
title_sort comparison of san joaquin kit fox den and california ground squirrel burrow attributes
topic burrows
california ground squirrel
dens
otospermophilus beecheyi
san joaquin kit fox
vulpes macrotis mutica
url https://journal.wildlife.ca.gov/2023/12/29/comparison-of-san-joaquin-kit-fox-den-and-california-ground-squirrel-burrow-attributes/
work_keys_str_mv AT briancypher comparisonofsanjoaquinkitfoxdenandcaliforniagroundsquirrelburrowattributes
AT alysegabaldon comparisonofsanjoaquinkitfoxdenandcaliforniagroundsquirrelburrowattributes
AT franciscoruizponce comparisonofsanjoaquinkitfoxdenandcaliforniagroundsquirrelburrowattributes
AT ericakelly comparisonofsanjoaquinkitfoxdenandcaliforniagroundsquirrelburrowattributes