Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach

Introduction: In the management of cloaca, there is concern that dissection of the urogenital sinus in early childhood with the aim of total anatomical correction is hazardous. Avoiding such mobilization and providing mitrofanoff channel, when needed, till peripubertal period reduces complications a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harshjeet Singh Bal, Sudipta Sen, Cenita Sam, Jacob Chacko, John Mathai, S R Regunandan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jiaps.com/article.asp?issn=0971-9261;year=2017;volume=22;issue=2;spage=108;epage=113;aulast=Bal
_version_ 1811240047674916864
author Harshjeet Singh Bal
Sudipta Sen
Cenita Sam
Jacob Chacko
John Mathai
S R Regunandan
author_facet Harshjeet Singh Bal
Sudipta Sen
Cenita Sam
Jacob Chacko
John Mathai
S R Regunandan
author_sort Harshjeet Singh Bal
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: In the management of cloaca, there is concern that dissection of the urogenital sinus in early childhood with the aim of total anatomical correction is hazardous. Avoiding such mobilization and providing mitrofanoff channel, when needed, till peripubertal period reduces complications and is technically easier. Materials and Methods: Forty-three cases of cloaca were managed in the period 2004–2016. Case records and radiology were reviewed retrospectively. The follow-up evaluation was done by looking into voiding history, bowel movements, and menstruation history. Results: There were three groups of children, namely, those with no reconstruction done elsewhere except a diverting fecal stoma (Group I, n = 25), those who had undergone anorectal correction elsewhere with no attempt at urogenital reconstruction (Group IIA, n = 13), and tho with attempted bowel and genitourinary reconstruction elsewhere (Group IIB, n = 5). The Group I children (one still awaiting reconstruction) underwent early rectal reconstruction followed by expectant management of the urogenital apparatus. The 18 referred cases had multiple problems, chiefly urogenital, of congenital or iatrogenic origin. While urinary reconstruction included bladder augmentation, ileal neobladder, bladder neck closure, and ureteric reimplantation, the foundation of urinary management was intermittent catheterization through mitrofanoff stoma and the avoidance of any dissection of the cloacal common channel. Surgery on the genital tracts included drainage of hydrocolpos, perineal surgery for low vaginae and abdominoperineal vaginoplasty for high vaginae in the peripubertal period with or without bowel supplementation. Spontaneous voiding was maintained in 17 of 25 (68%) Group I girls (including one death later from intestinal complications), 7 of 13 (54%), Group IIA girls, and 1 of 5 (20%) Group IIB girls. Painless menstruation was noted in eight postpubertal girls, three through the cloacal channel (awaiting reconstruction) and five through the reconstructed vagina. Most of the children are on a bowel management program for fecal cleanliness with washouts through the neoanus or Malone's stoma. Conclusion: We report a nonconventional approach to cloaca based on avoiding dissection of or around the common channel for urethrovaginal reconstruction, opting for mitrofanoff stoma for intermittent catheterization, when needed, and late vaginal reconstruction. We believe this approach has reduced the overall need for intermittent catheterization.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:12:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ecf760b7caee47a7a06929722e28502a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0971-9261
1998-3891
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:12:30Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
spelling doaj.art-ecf760b7caee47a7a06929722e28502a2022-12-22T03:31:50ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons0971-92611998-38912017-01-0122210811310.4103/0971-9261.202683Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approachHarshjeet Singh BalSudipta SenCenita SamJacob ChackoJohn MathaiS R RegunandanIntroduction: In the management of cloaca, there is concern that dissection of the urogenital sinus in early childhood with the aim of total anatomical correction is hazardous. Avoiding such mobilization and providing mitrofanoff channel, when needed, till peripubertal period reduces complications and is technically easier. Materials and Methods: Forty-three cases of cloaca were managed in the period 2004–2016. Case records and radiology were reviewed retrospectively. The follow-up evaluation was done by looking into voiding history, bowel movements, and menstruation history. Results: There were three groups of children, namely, those with no reconstruction done elsewhere except a diverting fecal stoma (Group I, n = 25), those who had undergone anorectal correction elsewhere with no attempt at urogenital reconstruction (Group IIA, n = 13), and tho with attempted bowel and genitourinary reconstruction elsewhere (Group IIB, n = 5). The Group I children (one still awaiting reconstruction) underwent early rectal reconstruction followed by expectant management of the urogenital apparatus. The 18 referred cases had multiple problems, chiefly urogenital, of congenital or iatrogenic origin. While urinary reconstruction included bladder augmentation, ileal neobladder, bladder neck closure, and ureteric reimplantation, the foundation of urinary management was intermittent catheterization through mitrofanoff stoma and the avoidance of any dissection of the cloacal common channel. Surgery on the genital tracts included drainage of hydrocolpos, perineal surgery for low vaginae and abdominoperineal vaginoplasty for high vaginae in the peripubertal period with or without bowel supplementation. Spontaneous voiding was maintained in 17 of 25 (68%) Group I girls (including one death later from intestinal complications), 7 of 13 (54%), Group IIA girls, and 1 of 5 (20%) Group IIB girls. Painless menstruation was noted in eight postpubertal girls, three through the cloacal channel (awaiting reconstruction) and five through the reconstructed vagina. Most of the children are on a bowel management program for fecal cleanliness with washouts through the neoanus or Malone's stoma. Conclusion: We report a nonconventional approach to cloaca based on avoiding dissection of or around the common channel for urethrovaginal reconstruction, opting for mitrofanoff stoma for intermittent catheterization, when needed, and late vaginal reconstruction. We believe this approach has reduced the overall need for intermittent catheterization.http://www.jiaps.com/article.asp?issn=0971-9261;year=2017;volume=22;issue=2;spage=108;epage=113;aulast=BalCloacamitrofanoff catheterizationurological reconstructionurological surgical procedure
spellingShingle Harshjeet Singh Bal
Sudipta Sen
Cenita Sam
Jacob Chacko
John Mathai
S R Regunandan
Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons
Cloaca
mitrofanoff catheterization
urological reconstruction
urological surgical procedure
title Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
title_full Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
title_fullStr Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
title_full_unstemmed Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
title_short Urogenital management in cloaca: An alternative approach
title_sort urogenital management in cloaca an alternative approach
topic Cloaca
mitrofanoff catheterization
urological reconstruction
urological surgical procedure
url http://www.jiaps.com/article.asp?issn=0971-9261;year=2017;volume=22;issue=2;spage=108;epage=113;aulast=Bal
work_keys_str_mv AT harshjeetsinghbal urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach
AT sudiptasen urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach
AT cenitasam urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach
AT jacobchacko urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach
AT johnmathai urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach
AT srregunandan urogenitalmanagementincloacaanalternativeapproach