"Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
This study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Society for Sociological Science
2022-05-01
|
Series: | Sociological Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/ |
_version_ | 1818186967645421568 |
---|---|
author | Adam Goldstein James Franklin Wharam |
author_facet | Adam Goldstein James Franklin Wharam |
author_sort | Adam Goldstein |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their own actuaries. We ask, to what extent does the individuation of choice (between insurance plans with disparate levels of cost-sharing) alter the social stratification of out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure burdens across socioeconomic status class strata? Our analysis draws on an insurance claims database from a large multi-employer commercial insurer, which includes information on plan offerings and realized OOP expenditure burdens for more than 37 million persons from 2002 to 2012. Consistent with expectations, the results of pooled difference-in-difference event study models reveal that transitions to devolved choice result in modestly greater increases in realized OOP burden among lower socioeconomic status enrollees, compared with the growth among higher-status enrollees. However, the magnitude of the increase in the between-class expenditure burden disparity is small in substantive terms. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:03:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ed14ccb26b134d099dd7ab43165a51c2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2330-6696 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T23:03:33Z |
publishDate | 2022-05-01 |
publisher | Society for Sociological Science |
record_format | Article |
series | Sociological Science |
spelling | doaj.art-ed14ccb26b134d099dd7ab43165a51c22022-12-22T00:47:00ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962022-05-0191022125110.15195/v9.a10"Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health InsuranceAdam Goldstein0James Franklin Wharam1Princeton University School of Public and International AffairsDuke University Department of Medicine and Duke-Margolis Center for Health PolicyThis study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their own actuaries. We ask, to what extent does the individuation of choice (between insurance plans with disparate levels of cost-sharing) alter the social stratification of out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure burdens across socioeconomic status class strata? Our analysis draws on an insurance claims database from a large multi-employer commercial insurer, which includes information on plan offerings and realized OOP expenditure burdens for more than 37 million persons from 2002 to 2012. Consistent with expectations, the results of pooled difference-in-difference event study models reveal that transitions to devolved choice result in modestly greater increases in realized OOP burden among lower socioeconomic status enrollees, compared with the growth among higher-status enrollees. However, the magnitude of the increase in the between-class expenditure burden disparity is small in substantive terms.https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/riskprivatizationhealth insurancemedical expendituresstratificationadministrative data |
spellingShingle | Adam Goldstein James Franklin Wharam "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Sociological Science risk privatization health insurance medical expenditures stratification administrative data |
title | "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance |
title_full | "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance |
title_fullStr | "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance |
title_full_unstemmed | "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance |
title_short | "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance |
title_sort | choose the plan that s right for you choice devolution as class biased institutional change in u s employer sponsored health insurance |
topic | risk privatization health insurance medical expenditures stratification administrative data |
url | https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/ |
work_keys_str_mv | AT adamgoldstein choosetheplanthatsrightforyouchoicedevolutionasclassbiasedinstitutionalchangeinusemployersponsoredhealthinsurance AT jamesfranklinwharam choosetheplanthatsrightforyouchoicedevolutionasclassbiasedinstitutionalchangeinusemployersponsoredhealthinsurance |