"Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance

This study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adam Goldstein, James Franklin Wharam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Sociological Science 2022-05-01
Series:Sociological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/
_version_ 1818186967645421568
author Adam Goldstein
James Franklin Wharam
author_facet Adam Goldstein
James Franklin Wharam
author_sort Adam Goldstein
collection DOAJ
description This study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their own actuaries. We ask, to what extent does the individuation of choice (between insurance plans with disparate levels of cost-sharing) alter the social stratification of out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure burdens across socioeconomic status class strata? Our analysis draws on an insurance claims database from a large multi-employer commercial insurer, which includes information on plan offerings and realized OOP expenditure burdens for more than 37 million persons from 2002 to 2012. Consistent with expectations, the results of pooled difference-in-difference event study models reveal that transitions to devolved choice result in modestly greater increases in realized OOP burden among lower socioeconomic status enrollees, compared with the growth among higher-status enrollees. However, the magnitude of the increase in the between-class expenditure burden disparity is small in substantive terms.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T23:03:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ed14ccb26b134d099dd7ab43165a51c2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2330-6696
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T23:03:33Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Society for Sociological Science
record_format Article
series Sociological Science
spelling doaj.art-ed14ccb26b134d099dd7ab43165a51c22022-12-22T00:47:00ZengSociety for Sociological ScienceSociological Science2330-66962022-05-0191022125110.15195/v9.a10"Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health InsuranceAdam Goldstein0James Franklin Wharam1Princeton University School of Public and International AffairsDuke University Department of Medicine and Duke-Margolis Center for Health PolicyThis study examines the distributional consequences of U.S. employers' efforts to devolve responsibility for managing their employees' medical insurance risk. The logic of consumer choice has increasingly come to dominate insurance benefit design, requiring that employees learn to be their own actuaries. We ask, to what extent does the individuation of choice (between insurance plans with disparate levels of cost-sharing) alter the social stratification of out-of-pocket (OOP) medical expenditure burdens across socioeconomic status class strata? Our analysis draws on an insurance claims database from a large multi-employer commercial insurer, which includes information on plan offerings and realized OOP expenditure burdens for more than 37 million persons from 2002 to 2012. Consistent with expectations, the results of pooled difference-in-difference event study models reveal that transitions to devolved choice result in modestly greater increases in realized OOP burden among lower socioeconomic status enrollees, compared with the growth among higher-status enrollees. However, the magnitude of the increase in the between-class expenditure burden disparity is small in substantive terms.https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/riskprivatizationhealth insurancemedical expendituresstratificationadministrative data
spellingShingle Adam Goldstein
James Franklin Wharam
"Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
Sociological Science
risk
privatization
health insurance
medical expenditures
stratification
administrative data
title "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
title_full "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
title_fullStr "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
title_full_unstemmed "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
title_short "Choose the Plan That’s Right for You": Choice Devolution as Class-Biased Institutional Change in U.S. Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance
title_sort choose the plan that s right for you choice devolution as class biased institutional change in u s employer sponsored health insurance
topic risk
privatization
health insurance
medical expenditures
stratification
administrative data
url https://sociologicalscience.com/articles-v9-10-221/
work_keys_str_mv AT adamgoldstein choosetheplanthatsrightforyouchoicedevolutionasclassbiasedinstitutionalchangeinusemployersponsoredhealthinsurance
AT jamesfranklinwharam choosetheplanthatsrightforyouchoicedevolutionasclassbiasedinstitutionalchangeinusemployersponsoredhealthinsurance